Cargando…

A socio-ecological analysis of barriers to the adoption, sustainablity and consistent use of sanitation facilities in rural Ethiopia

BACKGROUND: Despite evidence showing that access to and use of improved sanitation is associated with healthier households and communities, barriers influencing the adoption and sustainablity of sanitation facilities remain unclear. We conducted a qualitative case study to explore barriers influenci...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alemu, Fikralem, Kumie, Abera, Medhin, Girmay, Gebre, Teshome, Godfrey, Phoebe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5598066/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28903743
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4717-6
_version_ 1783263826775375872
author Alemu, Fikralem
Kumie, Abera
Medhin, Girmay
Gebre, Teshome
Godfrey, Phoebe
author_facet Alemu, Fikralem
Kumie, Abera
Medhin, Girmay
Gebre, Teshome
Godfrey, Phoebe
author_sort Alemu, Fikralem
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Despite evidence showing that access to and use of improved sanitation is associated with healthier households and communities, barriers influencing the adoption and sustainablity of sanitation facilities remain unclear. We conducted a qualitative case study to explore barriers influencing the adoption, sustainablity and consistent use of sanitation facilities in rural Ethiopia. METHODS: A qualitative study was conducted in the rural district of Becho, in central Ethiopia, from June to August 2016. A socio-ecological model and Integrated Behavioural Model (IBM) for a Water Hygiene and Sanitation (WASH) framework were employed to design the study and analyse data. A total of 10 in-depth interviews (IDI) were conducted with latrine adopters (n = 3), latrine non-adopters (n = 3), health extension workers (n = 3) and the district WASH coordinator (n = 1). Eight Focus Group Discussions (FGD) were undertaken with 75 participants, of which 31 were women. The FGDs and IDIs were tape-recorded, transcribed verbatim and translated into English. The analysis was supported using Nvivo version 10 software. RESULTS: Barriers to sustained adoption and use of sanitation facilities were categorized into 1) individual level factors (e.g., past latrine experience, lack of demand and perceived high cost to improved latrines), 2) household level factors (e.g., unaffordability, lack of space and absence of a physically strong family member), 3) community level factors (e.g., lack of access to public latrines, lack of shared rules against open defecation, lack of financial access for the poor), and 4) societal level factors (e.g., lack of strong local leadership, flooding, soil conditions, lack of appropriate sanitation technology, lack of promotion and demand creation for improved latrines). CONCLUSION: The use of the socio-ecological model and IBM-WASH framework helped to achieve a better understanding of multi-level and multi-dimensional barriers to sustained latrine adoption. The results indicate that there is a need to consider interventions that address multi-level factors concurrently.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5598066
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55980662017-09-18 A socio-ecological analysis of barriers to the adoption, sustainablity and consistent use of sanitation facilities in rural Ethiopia Alemu, Fikralem Kumie, Abera Medhin, Girmay Gebre, Teshome Godfrey, Phoebe BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Despite evidence showing that access to and use of improved sanitation is associated with healthier households and communities, barriers influencing the adoption and sustainablity of sanitation facilities remain unclear. We conducted a qualitative case study to explore barriers influencing the adoption, sustainablity and consistent use of sanitation facilities in rural Ethiopia. METHODS: A qualitative study was conducted in the rural district of Becho, in central Ethiopia, from June to August 2016. A socio-ecological model and Integrated Behavioural Model (IBM) for a Water Hygiene and Sanitation (WASH) framework were employed to design the study and analyse data. A total of 10 in-depth interviews (IDI) were conducted with latrine adopters (n = 3), latrine non-adopters (n = 3), health extension workers (n = 3) and the district WASH coordinator (n = 1). Eight Focus Group Discussions (FGD) were undertaken with 75 participants, of which 31 were women. The FGDs and IDIs were tape-recorded, transcribed verbatim and translated into English. The analysis was supported using Nvivo version 10 software. RESULTS: Barriers to sustained adoption and use of sanitation facilities were categorized into 1) individual level factors (e.g., past latrine experience, lack of demand and perceived high cost to improved latrines), 2) household level factors (e.g., unaffordability, lack of space and absence of a physically strong family member), 3) community level factors (e.g., lack of access to public latrines, lack of shared rules against open defecation, lack of financial access for the poor), and 4) societal level factors (e.g., lack of strong local leadership, flooding, soil conditions, lack of appropriate sanitation technology, lack of promotion and demand creation for improved latrines). CONCLUSION: The use of the socio-ecological model and IBM-WASH framework helped to achieve a better understanding of multi-level and multi-dimensional barriers to sustained latrine adoption. The results indicate that there is a need to consider interventions that address multi-level factors concurrently. BioMed Central 2017-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5598066/ /pubmed/28903743 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4717-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Alemu, Fikralem
Kumie, Abera
Medhin, Girmay
Gebre, Teshome
Godfrey, Phoebe
A socio-ecological analysis of barriers to the adoption, sustainablity and consistent use of sanitation facilities in rural Ethiopia
title A socio-ecological analysis of barriers to the adoption, sustainablity and consistent use of sanitation facilities in rural Ethiopia
title_full A socio-ecological analysis of barriers to the adoption, sustainablity and consistent use of sanitation facilities in rural Ethiopia
title_fullStr A socio-ecological analysis of barriers to the adoption, sustainablity and consistent use of sanitation facilities in rural Ethiopia
title_full_unstemmed A socio-ecological analysis of barriers to the adoption, sustainablity and consistent use of sanitation facilities in rural Ethiopia
title_short A socio-ecological analysis of barriers to the adoption, sustainablity and consistent use of sanitation facilities in rural Ethiopia
title_sort socio-ecological analysis of barriers to the adoption, sustainablity and consistent use of sanitation facilities in rural ethiopia
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5598066/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28903743
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4717-6
work_keys_str_mv AT alemufikralem asocioecologicalanalysisofbarrierstotheadoptionsustainablityandconsistentuseofsanitationfacilitiesinruralethiopia
AT kumieabera asocioecologicalanalysisofbarrierstotheadoptionsustainablityandconsistentuseofsanitationfacilitiesinruralethiopia
AT medhingirmay asocioecologicalanalysisofbarrierstotheadoptionsustainablityandconsistentuseofsanitationfacilitiesinruralethiopia
AT gebreteshome asocioecologicalanalysisofbarrierstotheadoptionsustainablityandconsistentuseofsanitationfacilitiesinruralethiopia
AT godfreyphoebe asocioecologicalanalysisofbarrierstotheadoptionsustainablityandconsistentuseofsanitationfacilitiesinruralethiopia
AT alemufikralem socioecologicalanalysisofbarrierstotheadoptionsustainablityandconsistentuseofsanitationfacilitiesinruralethiopia
AT kumieabera socioecologicalanalysisofbarrierstotheadoptionsustainablityandconsistentuseofsanitationfacilitiesinruralethiopia
AT medhingirmay socioecologicalanalysisofbarrierstotheadoptionsustainablityandconsistentuseofsanitationfacilitiesinruralethiopia
AT gebreteshome socioecologicalanalysisofbarrierstotheadoptionsustainablityandconsistentuseofsanitationfacilitiesinruralethiopia
AT godfreyphoebe socioecologicalanalysisofbarrierstotheadoptionsustainablityandconsistentuseofsanitationfacilitiesinruralethiopia