Cargando…
A socio-ecological analysis of barriers to the adoption, sustainablity and consistent use of sanitation facilities in rural Ethiopia
BACKGROUND: Despite evidence showing that access to and use of improved sanitation is associated with healthier households and communities, barriers influencing the adoption and sustainablity of sanitation facilities remain unclear. We conducted a qualitative case study to explore barriers influenci...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5598066/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28903743 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4717-6 |
_version_ | 1783263826775375872 |
---|---|
author | Alemu, Fikralem Kumie, Abera Medhin, Girmay Gebre, Teshome Godfrey, Phoebe |
author_facet | Alemu, Fikralem Kumie, Abera Medhin, Girmay Gebre, Teshome Godfrey, Phoebe |
author_sort | Alemu, Fikralem |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Despite evidence showing that access to and use of improved sanitation is associated with healthier households and communities, barriers influencing the adoption and sustainablity of sanitation facilities remain unclear. We conducted a qualitative case study to explore barriers influencing the adoption, sustainablity and consistent use of sanitation facilities in rural Ethiopia. METHODS: A qualitative study was conducted in the rural district of Becho, in central Ethiopia, from June to August 2016. A socio-ecological model and Integrated Behavioural Model (IBM) for a Water Hygiene and Sanitation (WASH) framework were employed to design the study and analyse data. A total of 10 in-depth interviews (IDI) were conducted with latrine adopters (n = 3), latrine non-adopters (n = 3), health extension workers (n = 3) and the district WASH coordinator (n = 1). Eight Focus Group Discussions (FGD) were undertaken with 75 participants, of which 31 were women. The FGDs and IDIs were tape-recorded, transcribed verbatim and translated into English. The analysis was supported using Nvivo version 10 software. RESULTS: Barriers to sustained adoption and use of sanitation facilities were categorized into 1) individual level factors (e.g., past latrine experience, lack of demand and perceived high cost to improved latrines), 2) household level factors (e.g., unaffordability, lack of space and absence of a physically strong family member), 3) community level factors (e.g., lack of access to public latrines, lack of shared rules against open defecation, lack of financial access for the poor), and 4) societal level factors (e.g., lack of strong local leadership, flooding, soil conditions, lack of appropriate sanitation technology, lack of promotion and demand creation for improved latrines). CONCLUSION: The use of the socio-ecological model and IBM-WASH framework helped to achieve a better understanding of multi-level and multi-dimensional barriers to sustained latrine adoption. The results indicate that there is a need to consider interventions that address multi-level factors concurrently. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5598066 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55980662017-09-18 A socio-ecological analysis of barriers to the adoption, sustainablity and consistent use of sanitation facilities in rural Ethiopia Alemu, Fikralem Kumie, Abera Medhin, Girmay Gebre, Teshome Godfrey, Phoebe BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Despite evidence showing that access to and use of improved sanitation is associated with healthier households and communities, barriers influencing the adoption and sustainablity of sanitation facilities remain unclear. We conducted a qualitative case study to explore barriers influencing the adoption, sustainablity and consistent use of sanitation facilities in rural Ethiopia. METHODS: A qualitative study was conducted in the rural district of Becho, in central Ethiopia, from June to August 2016. A socio-ecological model and Integrated Behavioural Model (IBM) for a Water Hygiene and Sanitation (WASH) framework were employed to design the study and analyse data. A total of 10 in-depth interviews (IDI) were conducted with latrine adopters (n = 3), latrine non-adopters (n = 3), health extension workers (n = 3) and the district WASH coordinator (n = 1). Eight Focus Group Discussions (FGD) were undertaken with 75 participants, of which 31 were women. The FGDs and IDIs were tape-recorded, transcribed verbatim and translated into English. The analysis was supported using Nvivo version 10 software. RESULTS: Barriers to sustained adoption and use of sanitation facilities were categorized into 1) individual level factors (e.g., past latrine experience, lack of demand and perceived high cost to improved latrines), 2) household level factors (e.g., unaffordability, lack of space and absence of a physically strong family member), 3) community level factors (e.g., lack of access to public latrines, lack of shared rules against open defecation, lack of financial access for the poor), and 4) societal level factors (e.g., lack of strong local leadership, flooding, soil conditions, lack of appropriate sanitation technology, lack of promotion and demand creation for improved latrines). CONCLUSION: The use of the socio-ecological model and IBM-WASH framework helped to achieve a better understanding of multi-level and multi-dimensional barriers to sustained latrine adoption. The results indicate that there is a need to consider interventions that address multi-level factors concurrently. BioMed Central 2017-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5598066/ /pubmed/28903743 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4717-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Alemu, Fikralem Kumie, Abera Medhin, Girmay Gebre, Teshome Godfrey, Phoebe A socio-ecological analysis of barriers to the adoption, sustainablity and consistent use of sanitation facilities in rural Ethiopia |
title | A socio-ecological analysis of barriers to the adoption, sustainablity and consistent use of sanitation facilities in rural Ethiopia |
title_full | A socio-ecological analysis of barriers to the adoption, sustainablity and consistent use of sanitation facilities in rural Ethiopia |
title_fullStr | A socio-ecological analysis of barriers to the adoption, sustainablity and consistent use of sanitation facilities in rural Ethiopia |
title_full_unstemmed | A socio-ecological analysis of barriers to the adoption, sustainablity and consistent use of sanitation facilities in rural Ethiopia |
title_short | A socio-ecological analysis of barriers to the adoption, sustainablity and consistent use of sanitation facilities in rural Ethiopia |
title_sort | socio-ecological analysis of barriers to the adoption, sustainablity and consistent use of sanitation facilities in rural ethiopia |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5598066/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28903743 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4717-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alemufikralem asocioecologicalanalysisofbarrierstotheadoptionsustainablityandconsistentuseofsanitationfacilitiesinruralethiopia AT kumieabera asocioecologicalanalysisofbarrierstotheadoptionsustainablityandconsistentuseofsanitationfacilitiesinruralethiopia AT medhingirmay asocioecologicalanalysisofbarrierstotheadoptionsustainablityandconsistentuseofsanitationfacilitiesinruralethiopia AT gebreteshome asocioecologicalanalysisofbarrierstotheadoptionsustainablityandconsistentuseofsanitationfacilitiesinruralethiopia AT godfreyphoebe asocioecologicalanalysisofbarrierstotheadoptionsustainablityandconsistentuseofsanitationfacilitiesinruralethiopia AT alemufikralem socioecologicalanalysisofbarrierstotheadoptionsustainablityandconsistentuseofsanitationfacilitiesinruralethiopia AT kumieabera socioecologicalanalysisofbarrierstotheadoptionsustainablityandconsistentuseofsanitationfacilitiesinruralethiopia AT medhingirmay socioecologicalanalysisofbarrierstotheadoptionsustainablityandconsistentuseofsanitationfacilitiesinruralethiopia AT gebreteshome socioecologicalanalysisofbarrierstotheadoptionsustainablityandconsistentuseofsanitationfacilitiesinruralethiopia AT godfreyphoebe socioecologicalanalysisofbarrierstotheadoptionsustainablityandconsistentuseofsanitationfacilitiesinruralethiopia |