Cargando…

Differences in cadmium transfer from tobacco to cigarette smoke, compared to arsenic or lead

Arsenic, cadmium and lead levels in tobacco filler and cigarette smoke were determined in a 568-sample worldwide survey. Median tobacco levels for arsenic, cadmium and lead were 237, 769 and 397 ng/g respectively, comparable to those previously reported albeit somewhat lower for lead and cadmium. Me...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Piadé, J.-J., Jaccard, G., Dolka, C., Belushkin, M., Wajrock, S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5598168/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28962333
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.toxrep.2014.11.005
_version_ 1783263847618969600
author Piadé, J.-J.
Jaccard, G.
Dolka, C.
Belushkin, M.
Wajrock, S.
author_facet Piadé, J.-J.
Jaccard, G.
Dolka, C.
Belushkin, M.
Wajrock, S.
author_sort Piadé, J.-J.
collection PubMed
description Arsenic, cadmium and lead levels in tobacco filler and cigarette smoke were determined in a 568-sample worldwide survey. Median tobacco levels for arsenic, cadmium and lead were 237, 769 and 397 ng/g respectively, comparable to those previously reported albeit somewhat lower for lead and cadmium. Median mainstream smoke yields for arsenic, cadmium and lead were <3.75, 18.2, and <12.8 ng/cig. under ISO, and <8.71, 75.1 and <45.7 ng/cig. under Health Canada Intense (HCI) smoking regime respectively. In the case of cigarettes with activated carbon, a selective retention of cadmium but not lead or arsenic was observed. This effect was more pronounced under ISO than under HCI smoking regimes. Cadmium selective retention by activated carbon was confirmed by testing specially designed prototype cigarettes and the causes for this selective filtration were investigated. The differences between cadmium, arsenic and lead in terms of their speciation in tobaccos and in cigarette smoke could be related to their distribution in the ash, butt, mainstream (in gas-phase and particulate-phase) and sidestream smoke of a smoked cigarette. The possible formation of organometallic cadmium derivatives in the smoke gas-phase is discussed, the presence of which could adequately explain the observed cadmium selective filtration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5598168
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55981682017-09-28 Differences in cadmium transfer from tobacco to cigarette smoke, compared to arsenic or lead Piadé, J.-J. Jaccard, G. Dolka, C. Belushkin, M. Wajrock, S. Toxicol Rep Article Arsenic, cadmium and lead levels in tobacco filler and cigarette smoke were determined in a 568-sample worldwide survey. Median tobacco levels for arsenic, cadmium and lead were 237, 769 and 397 ng/g respectively, comparable to those previously reported albeit somewhat lower for lead and cadmium. Median mainstream smoke yields for arsenic, cadmium and lead were <3.75, 18.2, and <12.8 ng/cig. under ISO, and <8.71, 75.1 and <45.7 ng/cig. under Health Canada Intense (HCI) smoking regime respectively. In the case of cigarettes with activated carbon, a selective retention of cadmium but not lead or arsenic was observed. This effect was more pronounced under ISO than under HCI smoking regimes. Cadmium selective retention by activated carbon was confirmed by testing specially designed prototype cigarettes and the causes for this selective filtration were investigated. The differences between cadmium, arsenic and lead in terms of their speciation in tobaccos and in cigarette smoke could be related to their distribution in the ash, butt, mainstream (in gas-phase and particulate-phase) and sidestream smoke of a smoked cigarette. The possible formation of organometallic cadmium derivatives in the smoke gas-phase is discussed, the presence of which could adequately explain the observed cadmium selective filtration. Elsevier 2014-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5598168/ /pubmed/28962333 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.toxrep.2014.11.005 Text en © 2014 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Piadé, J.-J.
Jaccard, G.
Dolka, C.
Belushkin, M.
Wajrock, S.
Differences in cadmium transfer from tobacco to cigarette smoke, compared to arsenic or lead
title Differences in cadmium transfer from tobacco to cigarette smoke, compared to arsenic or lead
title_full Differences in cadmium transfer from tobacco to cigarette smoke, compared to arsenic or lead
title_fullStr Differences in cadmium transfer from tobacco to cigarette smoke, compared to arsenic or lead
title_full_unstemmed Differences in cadmium transfer from tobacco to cigarette smoke, compared to arsenic or lead
title_short Differences in cadmium transfer from tobacco to cigarette smoke, compared to arsenic or lead
title_sort differences in cadmium transfer from tobacco to cigarette smoke, compared to arsenic or lead
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5598168/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28962333
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.toxrep.2014.11.005
work_keys_str_mv AT piadejj differencesincadmiumtransferfromtobaccotocigarettesmokecomparedtoarsenicorlead
AT jaccardg differencesincadmiumtransferfromtobaccotocigarettesmokecomparedtoarsenicorlead
AT dolkac differencesincadmiumtransferfromtobaccotocigarettesmokecomparedtoarsenicorlead
AT belushkinm differencesincadmiumtransferfromtobaccotocigarettesmokecomparedtoarsenicorlead
AT wajrocks differencesincadmiumtransferfromtobaccotocigarettesmokecomparedtoarsenicorlead