Cargando…
Preliminary validation of an optimized algorithm for intraocular lens power calculation in keratoconus
PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the theoretical influence on intraocular lens power (P(IOL)) calculation of the use of keratometric approach for corneal power (P(c)) calculation in keratoconus and to develop and validate an algorithm preliminarily to minimize this influence. METHODS: P(c) was...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5598179/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28820154 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_274_16 |
_version_ | 1783263850235166720 |
---|---|
author | Camps, Vicente J Piñero, David P Caravaca, Esteban De Fez, Dolores |
author_facet | Camps, Vicente J Piñero, David P Caravaca, Esteban De Fez, Dolores |
author_sort | Camps, Vicente J |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the theoretical influence on intraocular lens power (P(IOL)) calculation of the use of keratometric approach for corneal power (P(c)) calculation in keratoconus and to develop and validate an algorithm preliminarily to minimize this influence. METHODS: P(c) was calculated theoretically with the classical keratometric approach, the Gaussian equation, and the keratometric approach using a variable keratometric index (n(kadj)) dependent on r(1c)(P(kadj)). Differences in P(IOL) calculations (ΔP(IOL)) using keratometric and Gaussian P(c) values were evaluated. Preliminary clinical validation of a P(IOL) algorithm using P(kadj) was performed in 13 keratoconus eyes. RESULTS: P(IOL) underestimation was present if P(c) was overestimated, and vice versa. Theoretical P(IOL) overestimation up to −5.6 D and −6.2 D using Le Grand and Gullstrand eye models was found for a keratometric index of 1.3375. If n(kadj) was used, maximal Δ P(IOL) was ±1.1 D, with most of the values ≤±0.6 D. Clinically, P(IOL) under- and over-estimations ranged from −1.1 to − 0.4 D. No statistically significant differences were found between P(IOL) obtained with P(kadj) and Gaussian equation (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The use of the keratometric P(c) for P(IOL) calculations in keratoconus can lead to significant errors that may be minimized using a P(kadj) approach. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5598179 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55981792017-09-21 Preliminary validation of an optimized algorithm for intraocular lens power calculation in keratoconus Camps, Vicente J Piñero, David P Caravaca, Esteban De Fez, Dolores Indian J Ophthalmol Original Article PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the theoretical influence on intraocular lens power (P(IOL)) calculation of the use of keratometric approach for corneal power (P(c)) calculation in keratoconus and to develop and validate an algorithm preliminarily to minimize this influence. METHODS: P(c) was calculated theoretically with the classical keratometric approach, the Gaussian equation, and the keratometric approach using a variable keratometric index (n(kadj)) dependent on r(1c)(P(kadj)). Differences in P(IOL) calculations (ΔP(IOL)) using keratometric and Gaussian P(c) values were evaluated. Preliminary clinical validation of a P(IOL) algorithm using P(kadj) was performed in 13 keratoconus eyes. RESULTS: P(IOL) underestimation was present if P(c) was overestimated, and vice versa. Theoretical P(IOL) overestimation up to −5.6 D and −6.2 D using Le Grand and Gullstrand eye models was found for a keratometric index of 1.3375. If n(kadj) was used, maximal Δ P(IOL) was ±1.1 D, with most of the values ≤±0.6 D. Clinically, P(IOL) under- and over-estimations ranged from −1.1 to − 0.4 D. No statistically significant differences were found between P(IOL) obtained with P(kadj) and Gaussian equation (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The use of the keratometric P(c) for P(IOL) calculations in keratoconus can lead to significant errors that may be minimized using a P(kadj) approach. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5598179/ /pubmed/28820154 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_274_16 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Indian Journal of Ophthalmology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Camps, Vicente J Piñero, David P Caravaca, Esteban De Fez, Dolores Preliminary validation of an optimized algorithm for intraocular lens power calculation in keratoconus |
title | Preliminary validation of an optimized algorithm for intraocular lens power calculation in keratoconus |
title_full | Preliminary validation of an optimized algorithm for intraocular lens power calculation in keratoconus |
title_fullStr | Preliminary validation of an optimized algorithm for intraocular lens power calculation in keratoconus |
title_full_unstemmed | Preliminary validation of an optimized algorithm for intraocular lens power calculation in keratoconus |
title_short | Preliminary validation of an optimized algorithm for intraocular lens power calculation in keratoconus |
title_sort | preliminary validation of an optimized algorithm for intraocular lens power calculation in keratoconus |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5598179/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28820154 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_274_16 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT campsvicentej preliminaryvalidationofanoptimizedalgorithmforintraocularlenspowercalculationinkeratoconus AT pinerodavidp preliminaryvalidationofanoptimizedalgorithmforintraocularlenspowercalculationinkeratoconus AT caravacaesteban preliminaryvalidationofanoptimizedalgorithmforintraocularlenspowercalculationinkeratoconus AT defezdolores preliminaryvalidationofanoptimizedalgorithmforintraocularlenspowercalculationinkeratoconus |