Cargando…

Preliminary validation of an optimized algorithm for intraocular lens power calculation in keratoconus

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the theoretical influence on intraocular lens power (P(IOL)) calculation of the use of keratometric approach for corneal power (P(c)) calculation in keratoconus and to develop and validate an algorithm preliminarily to minimize this influence. METHODS: P(c) was...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Camps, Vicente J, Piñero, David P, Caravaca, Esteban, De Fez, Dolores
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5598179/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28820154
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_274_16
_version_ 1783263850235166720
author Camps, Vicente J
Piñero, David P
Caravaca, Esteban
De Fez, Dolores
author_facet Camps, Vicente J
Piñero, David P
Caravaca, Esteban
De Fez, Dolores
author_sort Camps, Vicente J
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the theoretical influence on intraocular lens power (P(IOL)) calculation of the use of keratometric approach for corneal power (P(c)) calculation in keratoconus and to develop and validate an algorithm preliminarily to minimize this influence. METHODS: P(c) was calculated theoretically with the classical keratometric approach, the Gaussian equation, and the keratometric approach using a variable keratometric index (n(kadj)) dependent on r(1c)(P(kadj)). Differences in P(IOL) calculations (ΔP(IOL)) using keratometric and Gaussian P(c) values were evaluated. Preliminary clinical validation of a P(IOL) algorithm using P(kadj) was performed in 13 keratoconus eyes. RESULTS: P(IOL) underestimation was present if P(c) was overestimated, and vice versa. Theoretical P(IOL) overestimation up to −5.6 D and −6.2 D using Le Grand and Gullstrand eye models was found for a keratometric index of 1.3375. If n(kadj) was used, maximal Δ P(IOL) was ±1.1 D, with most of the values ≤±0.6 D. Clinically, P(IOL) under- and over-estimations ranged from −1.1 to − 0.4 D. No statistically significant differences were found between P(IOL) obtained with P(kadj) and Gaussian equation (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The use of the keratometric P(c) for P(IOL) calculations in keratoconus can lead to significant errors that may be minimized using a P(kadj) approach.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5598179
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55981792017-09-21 Preliminary validation of an optimized algorithm for intraocular lens power calculation in keratoconus Camps, Vicente J Piñero, David P Caravaca, Esteban De Fez, Dolores Indian J Ophthalmol Original Article PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the theoretical influence on intraocular lens power (P(IOL)) calculation of the use of keratometric approach for corneal power (P(c)) calculation in keratoconus and to develop and validate an algorithm preliminarily to minimize this influence. METHODS: P(c) was calculated theoretically with the classical keratometric approach, the Gaussian equation, and the keratometric approach using a variable keratometric index (n(kadj)) dependent on r(1c)(P(kadj)). Differences in P(IOL) calculations (ΔP(IOL)) using keratometric and Gaussian P(c) values were evaluated. Preliminary clinical validation of a P(IOL) algorithm using P(kadj) was performed in 13 keratoconus eyes. RESULTS: P(IOL) underestimation was present if P(c) was overestimated, and vice versa. Theoretical P(IOL) overestimation up to −5.6 D and −6.2 D using Le Grand and Gullstrand eye models was found for a keratometric index of 1.3375. If n(kadj) was used, maximal Δ P(IOL) was ±1.1 D, with most of the values ≤±0.6 D. Clinically, P(IOL) under- and over-estimations ranged from −1.1 to − 0.4 D. No statistically significant differences were found between P(IOL) obtained with P(kadj) and Gaussian equation (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The use of the keratometric P(c) for P(IOL) calculations in keratoconus can lead to significant errors that may be minimized using a P(kadj) approach. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5598179/ /pubmed/28820154 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_274_16 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Indian Journal of Ophthalmology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Camps, Vicente J
Piñero, David P
Caravaca, Esteban
De Fez, Dolores
Preliminary validation of an optimized algorithm for intraocular lens power calculation in keratoconus
title Preliminary validation of an optimized algorithm for intraocular lens power calculation in keratoconus
title_full Preliminary validation of an optimized algorithm for intraocular lens power calculation in keratoconus
title_fullStr Preliminary validation of an optimized algorithm for intraocular lens power calculation in keratoconus
title_full_unstemmed Preliminary validation of an optimized algorithm for intraocular lens power calculation in keratoconus
title_short Preliminary validation of an optimized algorithm for intraocular lens power calculation in keratoconus
title_sort preliminary validation of an optimized algorithm for intraocular lens power calculation in keratoconus
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5598179/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28820154
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_274_16
work_keys_str_mv AT campsvicentej preliminaryvalidationofanoptimizedalgorithmforintraocularlenspowercalculationinkeratoconus
AT pinerodavidp preliminaryvalidationofanoptimizedalgorithmforintraocularlenspowercalculationinkeratoconus
AT caravacaesteban preliminaryvalidationofanoptimizedalgorithmforintraocularlenspowercalculationinkeratoconus
AT defezdolores preliminaryvalidationofanoptimizedalgorithmforintraocularlenspowercalculationinkeratoconus