Cargando…

Comparison between the mainstream smoke of eleven RYO tobacco brands and the reference tobacco 3R4F

In this study 11 commercial roll-your-own (RYO) tobacco brands sold in Spain and the reference tobacco 3R4F have been smoked and several components of the mainstream tobacco smoke have been analyzed. Cigarettes were prepared using commercial tubes, and were smoked under smoking conditions based on t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marcilla, A., Beltran, M.I., Gómez-Siurana, A., Berenguer, D., Martínez-Castellanos, I.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5598218/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28962233
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.toxrep.2014.05.004
_version_ 1783263858612240384
author Marcilla, A.
Beltran, M.I.
Gómez-Siurana, A.
Berenguer, D.
Martínez-Castellanos, I.
author_facet Marcilla, A.
Beltran, M.I.
Gómez-Siurana, A.
Berenguer, D.
Martínez-Castellanos, I.
author_sort Marcilla, A.
collection PubMed
description In this study 11 commercial roll-your-own (RYO) tobacco brands sold in Spain and the reference tobacco 3R4F have been smoked and several components of the mainstream tobacco smoke have been analyzed. Cigarettes were prepared using commercial tubes, and were smoked under smoking conditions based on the ISO 3308. The gaseous and condensed fractions of the smoke from RYO brands and 3R4F have been analyzed and compared. RYO tobaccos, as opposed to 3R4F, present lower amounts of condensed products in the traps than in the filters. In general, RYO tobaccos also provide lower yields of most of the compounds detected in the gas fraction. The yield of CO is between 15.4 and 20.4 mg/cigarette. In most of the cases studied, RYO tobaccos deliver higher amounts of nicotine than the 3R4F tobacco. On average, the yield of the different chemical families of compounds appearing in the particulate matter retained in the cigarette filters tends to be around three times higher than those obtained from 3R4F, whereas similar values have been obtained in the particulate matter retained in the traps located after the filters. It can be concluded that RYO tobaccos are not less hazardous than the reference tobacco, which may be contrary to popular belief.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5598218
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55982182017-09-28 Comparison between the mainstream smoke of eleven RYO tobacco brands and the reference tobacco 3R4F Marcilla, A. Beltran, M.I. Gómez-Siurana, A. Berenguer, D. Martínez-Castellanos, I. Toxicol Rep Article In this study 11 commercial roll-your-own (RYO) tobacco brands sold in Spain and the reference tobacco 3R4F have been smoked and several components of the mainstream tobacco smoke have been analyzed. Cigarettes were prepared using commercial tubes, and were smoked under smoking conditions based on the ISO 3308. The gaseous and condensed fractions of the smoke from RYO brands and 3R4F have been analyzed and compared. RYO tobaccos, as opposed to 3R4F, present lower amounts of condensed products in the traps than in the filters. In general, RYO tobaccos also provide lower yields of most of the compounds detected in the gas fraction. The yield of CO is between 15.4 and 20.4 mg/cigarette. In most of the cases studied, RYO tobaccos deliver higher amounts of nicotine than the 3R4F tobacco. On average, the yield of the different chemical families of compounds appearing in the particulate matter retained in the cigarette filters tends to be around three times higher than those obtained from 3R4F, whereas similar values have been obtained in the particulate matter retained in the traps located after the filters. It can be concluded that RYO tobaccos are not less hazardous than the reference tobacco, which may be contrary to popular belief. Elsevier 2014-05-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5598218/ /pubmed/28962233 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.toxrep.2014.05.004 Text en © 2014 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Marcilla, A.
Beltran, M.I.
Gómez-Siurana, A.
Berenguer, D.
Martínez-Castellanos, I.
Comparison between the mainstream smoke of eleven RYO tobacco brands and the reference tobacco 3R4F
title Comparison between the mainstream smoke of eleven RYO tobacco brands and the reference tobacco 3R4F
title_full Comparison between the mainstream smoke of eleven RYO tobacco brands and the reference tobacco 3R4F
title_fullStr Comparison between the mainstream smoke of eleven RYO tobacco brands and the reference tobacco 3R4F
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between the mainstream smoke of eleven RYO tobacco brands and the reference tobacco 3R4F
title_short Comparison between the mainstream smoke of eleven RYO tobacco brands and the reference tobacco 3R4F
title_sort comparison between the mainstream smoke of eleven ryo tobacco brands and the reference tobacco 3r4f
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5598218/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28962233
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.toxrep.2014.05.004
work_keys_str_mv AT marcillaa comparisonbetweenthemainstreamsmokeofelevenryotobaccobrandsandthereferencetobacco3r4f
AT beltranmi comparisonbetweenthemainstreamsmokeofelevenryotobaccobrandsandthereferencetobacco3r4f
AT gomezsiuranaa comparisonbetweenthemainstreamsmokeofelevenryotobaccobrandsandthereferencetobacco3r4f
AT berenguerd comparisonbetweenthemainstreamsmokeofelevenryotobaccobrandsandthereferencetobacco3r4f
AT martinezcastellanosi comparisonbetweenthemainstreamsmokeofelevenryotobaccobrandsandthereferencetobacco3r4f