Cargando…

Self-reported Lupus flare: Association with everyday home and personal product exposure

BACKGROUND: The number of chemicals in household products has driven concern about potential adverse health through their use. Most research concentrates on product chemicals with reproductive and carcinogenic consequences, however some evidence exists that immune effects can lead to exacerbation of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Squance, Marline L., Reeves, Glenn, Attia, John, Bridgman, Howard, Guest, Maya
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5598386/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28962424
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.toxrep.2015.05.010
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: The number of chemicals in household products has driven concern about potential adverse health through their use. Most research concentrates on product chemicals with reproductive and carcinogenic consequences, however some evidence exists that immune effects can lead to exacerbation of autoimmune illnesses such as lupus (SLE). OBJECTIVES: This paper examines household and personal product exposure patterns in a pilot case/control study of female Australians. We also examined associations between common product exposure and SLE symptom exacerbation over a year period. METHODS: We enrolled 41 control and 80 SLE participants aged 18–80 years. Qualitative techniques of structured interview and thematic analysis retrospectively explored patterns of product use, and flare history data of SLE participants. Negative binomial regression models explored associations between self-reported flare (SRF) days and exposure to 34 common home product groups. RESULTS: Mean product counts did not differ between participant groups (mean 33.1: SD 11.8), or flare groups (flare mean 32.6:SD 12, no-flare 31.8:SD 6.6). Products used for personal hygiene and general house cleaning were most frequently used.Significant association with increased SRF day relative risk (IRR) was seen for bath oil use (IRR 1.008, CI 1.00–1.02). Paradoxical “protective” effects, (reduced SRF days) were found for cleansing beauty (IRR 0.999, CI 0.998–0.999), make-up (IRR 0.998, CI 0.997–0.999); adhesives (IRR 0.994, CI 0.991–0.997) and paint (IRR 0.99, CI 0.986–0.995). CONCLUSIONS: Everyday product exposures can impact on symptom exacerbation in SLE. Some offering protection and others increased health risk. Identifying environmental associations offer the possibility of life-style interventions to reduce illness impact.