Cargando…

Endogenous Heat‐Shock Protein Induction with or Without Radiofrequency Ablation or Cryoablation in Patients with Stage IV Melanoma

LESSONS LEARNED. Percutaneous thermal ablation combined with in situ granulocyte‐macrophage colony‐stimulating factor cytokine therapy was technically feasible and well tolerated. No significant clinical or immunologic responses were seen. BACKGROUND. Melanoma tumor‐derived heat‐shock proteins (HSPs...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Domingo‐Musibay, Evidio, Heun, James M., Nevala, Wendy K., Callstrom, Matthew, Atwell, Thomas, Galanis, Evanthia, Erickson, Lori A., Markovic, Svetomir N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AlphaMed Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5599201/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28679643
http://dx.doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0060
_version_ 1783264039991771136
author Domingo‐Musibay, Evidio
Heun, James M.
Nevala, Wendy K.
Callstrom, Matthew
Atwell, Thomas
Galanis, Evanthia
Erickson, Lori A.
Markovic, Svetomir N.
author_facet Domingo‐Musibay, Evidio
Heun, James M.
Nevala, Wendy K.
Callstrom, Matthew
Atwell, Thomas
Galanis, Evanthia
Erickson, Lori A.
Markovic, Svetomir N.
author_sort Domingo‐Musibay, Evidio
collection PubMed
description LESSONS LEARNED. Percutaneous thermal ablation combined with in situ granulocyte‐macrophage colony‐stimulating factor cytokine therapy was technically feasible and well tolerated. No significant clinical or immunologic responses were seen. BACKGROUND. Melanoma tumor‐derived heat‐shock proteins (HSPs) and HSP‐peptide complexes can elicit protective antitumor responses. The granulocyte‐macrophage colony‐stimulating factor (GM‐CSF) chemokine can also promote uptake and processing by professional antigen presenting cells (APCs). On this basis, we designed a pilot study of percutaneous thermal ablation as a means to induce heat‐shock protein vaccination plus GM‐CSF to determine safety and preliminary antitumor activity of this combination. MATERIALS AND METHODS. This study was designed to assess overall safety of percutaneous ablation combined with GM‐CSF for unresectable, metastatic melanoma including uveal and mucosal types. All patients received heat‐shock therapy (42°C for 30 minutes), then received one of three treatments: (a) intralesional GM‐CSF (500 mcg standard dose); (b) radiofrequency ablation (RFA) + GM‐CSF; or (c) cryoablation plus GM‐CSF. The primary endpoint of the study was the induction of endogenous HSP70 and melanoma‐specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL). RESULTS. Nine patients (three per study arm) were enrolled. No dose‐limiting toxicity was observed as specified per protocol. All patients developed progressive disease and went on to receive alternative therapy. Median overall survival (OS) was 8.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 2–17.2). The study was not powered to detect a difference in clinical outcome among treatment groups. CONCLUSION. Percutaneous thermal ablation plus GM‐CSF was well tolerated, technically feasible, and demonstrated an acceptable adverse event profile comparable to conventional RFA and cryoablation. While HSP70 was induced following therapy, the degree of HSP70 elevation was not associated with clinical outcome or induced CTL responses. While percutaneous thermal ablation plus GM‐CSF combinations including checkpoint inhibitors could be considered in future studies, the use of GM‐CSF remains experimental and for use in the context of clinical trials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5599201
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher AlphaMed Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55992012017-09-21 Endogenous Heat‐Shock Protein Induction with or Without Radiofrequency Ablation or Cryoablation in Patients with Stage IV Melanoma Domingo‐Musibay, Evidio Heun, James M. Nevala, Wendy K. Callstrom, Matthew Atwell, Thomas Galanis, Evanthia Erickson, Lori A. Markovic, Svetomir N. Oncologist Clinical Trial Results LESSONS LEARNED. Percutaneous thermal ablation combined with in situ granulocyte‐macrophage colony‐stimulating factor cytokine therapy was technically feasible and well tolerated. No significant clinical or immunologic responses were seen. BACKGROUND. Melanoma tumor‐derived heat‐shock proteins (HSPs) and HSP‐peptide complexes can elicit protective antitumor responses. The granulocyte‐macrophage colony‐stimulating factor (GM‐CSF) chemokine can also promote uptake and processing by professional antigen presenting cells (APCs). On this basis, we designed a pilot study of percutaneous thermal ablation as a means to induce heat‐shock protein vaccination plus GM‐CSF to determine safety and preliminary antitumor activity of this combination. MATERIALS AND METHODS. This study was designed to assess overall safety of percutaneous ablation combined with GM‐CSF for unresectable, metastatic melanoma including uveal and mucosal types. All patients received heat‐shock therapy (42°C for 30 minutes), then received one of three treatments: (a) intralesional GM‐CSF (500 mcg standard dose); (b) radiofrequency ablation (RFA) + GM‐CSF; or (c) cryoablation plus GM‐CSF. The primary endpoint of the study was the induction of endogenous HSP70 and melanoma‐specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL). RESULTS. Nine patients (three per study arm) were enrolled. No dose‐limiting toxicity was observed as specified per protocol. All patients developed progressive disease and went on to receive alternative therapy. Median overall survival (OS) was 8.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 2–17.2). The study was not powered to detect a difference in clinical outcome among treatment groups. CONCLUSION. Percutaneous thermal ablation plus GM‐CSF was well tolerated, technically feasible, and demonstrated an acceptable adverse event profile comparable to conventional RFA and cryoablation. While HSP70 was induced following therapy, the degree of HSP70 elevation was not associated with clinical outcome or induced CTL responses. While percutaneous thermal ablation plus GM‐CSF combinations including checkpoint inhibitors could be considered in future studies, the use of GM‐CSF remains experimental and for use in the context of clinical trials. AlphaMed Press 2017-07-05 2017-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5599201/ /pubmed/28679643 http://dx.doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0060 Text en © AlphaMedPress; the data published online to support this summary is the property of the authors
spellingShingle Clinical Trial Results
Domingo‐Musibay, Evidio
Heun, James M.
Nevala, Wendy K.
Callstrom, Matthew
Atwell, Thomas
Galanis, Evanthia
Erickson, Lori A.
Markovic, Svetomir N.
Endogenous Heat‐Shock Protein Induction with or Without Radiofrequency Ablation or Cryoablation in Patients with Stage IV Melanoma
title Endogenous Heat‐Shock Protein Induction with or Without Radiofrequency Ablation or Cryoablation in Patients with Stage IV Melanoma
title_full Endogenous Heat‐Shock Protein Induction with or Without Radiofrequency Ablation or Cryoablation in Patients with Stage IV Melanoma
title_fullStr Endogenous Heat‐Shock Protein Induction with or Without Radiofrequency Ablation or Cryoablation in Patients with Stage IV Melanoma
title_full_unstemmed Endogenous Heat‐Shock Protein Induction with or Without Radiofrequency Ablation or Cryoablation in Patients with Stage IV Melanoma
title_short Endogenous Heat‐Shock Protein Induction with or Without Radiofrequency Ablation or Cryoablation in Patients with Stage IV Melanoma
title_sort endogenous heat‐shock protein induction with or without radiofrequency ablation or cryoablation in patients with stage iv melanoma
topic Clinical Trial Results
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5599201/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28679643
http://dx.doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0060
work_keys_str_mv AT domingomusibayevidio endogenousheatshockproteininductionwithorwithoutradiofrequencyablationorcryoablationinpatientswithstageivmelanoma
AT heunjamesm endogenousheatshockproteininductionwithorwithoutradiofrequencyablationorcryoablationinpatientswithstageivmelanoma
AT nevalawendyk endogenousheatshockproteininductionwithorwithoutradiofrequencyablationorcryoablationinpatientswithstageivmelanoma
AT callstrommatthew endogenousheatshockproteininductionwithorwithoutradiofrequencyablationorcryoablationinpatientswithstageivmelanoma
AT atwellthomas endogenousheatshockproteininductionwithorwithoutradiofrequencyablationorcryoablationinpatientswithstageivmelanoma
AT galanisevanthia endogenousheatshockproteininductionwithorwithoutradiofrequencyablationorcryoablationinpatientswithstageivmelanoma
AT ericksonloria endogenousheatshockproteininductionwithorwithoutradiofrequencyablationorcryoablationinpatientswithstageivmelanoma
AT markovicsvetomirn endogenousheatshockproteininductionwithorwithoutradiofrequencyablationorcryoablationinpatientswithstageivmelanoma