Cargando…

Effect of pregnancy planning on maternal and neonatal outcomes in women with Type 1 diabetes

AIMS: To assess the effect of pregnancy planning on maternal and neonatal outcomes in women with Type 1 diabetes. METHODS: Pregnancy planning was assessed retrospectively in a cohort of women who participated in the Diabetes and Pre‐eclampsia Intervention Trial (DAPIT). Pregnancy planning was determ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wotherspoon, A. C., Young, I. S., Patterson, C. C., McCance, D. R., Holmes, V. A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5599945/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28586549
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dme.13398
_version_ 1783264153883901952
author Wotherspoon, A. C.
Young, I. S.
Patterson, C. C.
McCance, D. R.
Holmes, V. A.
author_facet Wotherspoon, A. C.
Young, I. S.
Patterson, C. C.
McCance, D. R.
Holmes, V. A.
author_sort Wotherspoon, A. C.
collection PubMed
description AIMS: To assess the effect of pregnancy planning on maternal and neonatal outcomes in women with Type 1 diabetes. METHODS: Pregnancy planning was assessed retrospectively in a cohort of women who participated in the Diabetes and Pre‐eclampsia Intervention Trial (DAPIT). Pregnancy planning was determined based on self‐report as to whether pregnancy was planned or unplanned. The effect of pregnancy planning on maternal and neonatal outcomes was examined, controlling for confounding variables. RESULTS: A total of 747 women were included in the study, of whom 39% considered their pregnancy unplanned. Characteristics associated with unplanned pregnancy included being younger (P<0.001), being a current smoker (P<0.001), being from a lower social class (P<0.001) and having higher HbA(1c) values prior to and throughout pregnancy (P≤0.005). Significantly fewer women with unplanned vs planned pregnancies received pre‐pregnancy counselling (24% vs 64%; P<0.001). Infants of women with unplanned pregnancies were more likely to be small for gestational age (<5(th) centile; P=0.004), to be admitted to the neonatal care unit (P=0.001) and to have a longer stay in hospital (P=0.01). Outcomes did not differ between the groups in relation to pre‐eclampsia, congenital malformations or a composite adverse outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Risks associated with diabetes in pregnancy need to be highlighted to all women, their partners and families, and healthcare professionals. Further research is required to determine if these groups are fully aware of the risks associated with diabetes in pregnancy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5599945
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55999452017-10-02 Effect of pregnancy planning on maternal and neonatal outcomes in women with Type 1 diabetes Wotherspoon, A. C. Young, I. S. Patterson, C. C. McCance, D. R. Holmes, V. A. Diabet Med Research Articles AIMS: To assess the effect of pregnancy planning on maternal and neonatal outcomes in women with Type 1 diabetes. METHODS: Pregnancy planning was assessed retrospectively in a cohort of women who participated in the Diabetes and Pre‐eclampsia Intervention Trial (DAPIT). Pregnancy planning was determined based on self‐report as to whether pregnancy was planned or unplanned. The effect of pregnancy planning on maternal and neonatal outcomes was examined, controlling for confounding variables. RESULTS: A total of 747 women were included in the study, of whom 39% considered their pregnancy unplanned. Characteristics associated with unplanned pregnancy included being younger (P<0.001), being a current smoker (P<0.001), being from a lower social class (P<0.001) and having higher HbA(1c) values prior to and throughout pregnancy (P≤0.005). Significantly fewer women with unplanned vs planned pregnancies received pre‐pregnancy counselling (24% vs 64%; P<0.001). Infants of women with unplanned pregnancies were more likely to be small for gestational age (<5(th) centile; P=0.004), to be admitted to the neonatal care unit (P=0.001) and to have a longer stay in hospital (P=0.01). Outcomes did not differ between the groups in relation to pre‐eclampsia, congenital malformations or a composite adverse outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Risks associated with diabetes in pregnancy need to be highlighted to all women, their partners and families, and healthcare professionals. Further research is required to determine if these groups are fully aware of the risks associated with diabetes in pregnancy. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-07-12 2017-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5599945/ /pubmed/28586549 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dme.13398 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Diabetic Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Diabetes UK This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Wotherspoon, A. C.
Young, I. S.
Patterson, C. C.
McCance, D. R.
Holmes, V. A.
Effect of pregnancy planning on maternal and neonatal outcomes in women with Type 1 diabetes
title Effect of pregnancy planning on maternal and neonatal outcomes in women with Type 1 diabetes
title_full Effect of pregnancy planning on maternal and neonatal outcomes in women with Type 1 diabetes
title_fullStr Effect of pregnancy planning on maternal and neonatal outcomes in women with Type 1 diabetes
title_full_unstemmed Effect of pregnancy planning on maternal and neonatal outcomes in women with Type 1 diabetes
title_short Effect of pregnancy planning on maternal and neonatal outcomes in women with Type 1 diabetes
title_sort effect of pregnancy planning on maternal and neonatal outcomes in women with type 1 diabetes
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5599945/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28586549
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dme.13398
work_keys_str_mv AT wotherspoonac effectofpregnancyplanningonmaternalandneonataloutcomesinwomenwithtype1diabetes
AT youngis effectofpregnancyplanningonmaternalandneonataloutcomesinwomenwithtype1diabetes
AT pattersoncc effectofpregnancyplanningonmaternalandneonataloutcomesinwomenwithtype1diabetes
AT mccancedr effectofpregnancyplanningonmaternalandneonataloutcomesinwomenwithtype1diabetes
AT holmesva effectofpregnancyplanningonmaternalandneonataloutcomesinwomenwithtype1diabetes
AT effectofpregnancyplanningonmaternalandneonataloutcomesinwomenwithtype1diabetes