Cargando…

A phase III randomized controlled study on the efficacy and improved bowel function of prolonged‐release (PR) oxycodone‐naloxone (up to 160/80 mg daily) vs oxycodone PR

BACKGROUND: Oxycodone/naloxone (OXN PR) is a prolonged‐release formulation containing oxycodone and naloxone in a 2:1 ratio. This study aimed to evaluate the tolerability and efficacy of doses up to OXN160/80 mg PR compared with oxycodone prolonged‐release formulation (OxyPR) in a randomised control...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dupoiron, D., Stachowiak, A., Loewenstein, O., Ellery, A., Kremers, W., Bosse, B., Hopp, M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5600007/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28641363
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejp.1054
_version_ 1783264167398998016
author Dupoiron, D.
Stachowiak, A.
Loewenstein, O.
Ellery, A.
Kremers, W.
Bosse, B.
Hopp, M.
author_facet Dupoiron, D.
Stachowiak, A.
Loewenstein, O.
Ellery, A.
Kremers, W.
Bosse, B.
Hopp, M.
author_sort Dupoiron, D.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Oxycodone/naloxone (OXN PR) is a prolonged‐release formulation containing oxycodone and naloxone in a 2:1 ratio. This study aimed to evaluate the tolerability and efficacy of doses up to OXN160/80 mg PR compared with oxycodone prolonged‐release formulation (OxyPR) in a randomised controlled trial. METHODS: Two hundred and forty‐three patients were randomised to treatment with OXN PR (n = 123) or OxyPR (n = 120) during the 5‐week double‐blind study. Measured were: opioid‐induced constipation [bowel function index score (BFI)]; analgesic efficacy (NRS 0–10); daily laxative rescue medication use; rescue medication use, and the number of complete spontaneous bowel movements (CSBMs) per week. A subanalysis was conducted in cancer patients. RESULTS: Greater reductions in mean BFI scores were reported for the OXN PR group compared with OxyPR from Week 1 onwards; at Week 5 the mean change from baseline was −32.5 versus −14.2. Average 24‐h pain scores were low and remained stable in the range 3–4 in both treatment groups. Analgesic rescue medication use was similar between the groups. Patients receiving OXN PR used significantly lower mean daily doses of laxative rescue medication than those receiving OxyPR (P = 0.006). The number of CSBM in the OXN PR group approximately doubled compared with a 25% decrease in the OxyPR group. Comparable results to the total study population were reported in the cancer patient subgroup. CONCLUSIONS: OXN PR in daily doses of up to 160/80 mg significantly improves bowel function compared with equivalent doses of OxyPR while still providing comparable analgesic efficacy. SIGNIFICANCE: Effective analgesia can be achieved using oxycodone/naloxone PR up to 160/80 mg daily without compromising bowel function. A similar outcome was reported in cancer and non‐cancer patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5600007
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56000072017-10-02 A phase III randomized controlled study on the efficacy and improved bowel function of prolonged‐release (PR) oxycodone‐naloxone (up to 160/80 mg daily) vs oxycodone PR Dupoiron, D. Stachowiak, A. Loewenstein, O. Ellery, A. Kremers, W. Bosse, B. Hopp, M. Eur J Pain Original Research BACKGROUND: Oxycodone/naloxone (OXN PR) is a prolonged‐release formulation containing oxycodone and naloxone in a 2:1 ratio. This study aimed to evaluate the tolerability and efficacy of doses up to OXN160/80 mg PR compared with oxycodone prolonged‐release formulation (OxyPR) in a randomised controlled trial. METHODS: Two hundred and forty‐three patients were randomised to treatment with OXN PR (n = 123) or OxyPR (n = 120) during the 5‐week double‐blind study. Measured were: opioid‐induced constipation [bowel function index score (BFI)]; analgesic efficacy (NRS 0–10); daily laxative rescue medication use; rescue medication use, and the number of complete spontaneous bowel movements (CSBMs) per week. A subanalysis was conducted in cancer patients. RESULTS: Greater reductions in mean BFI scores were reported for the OXN PR group compared with OxyPR from Week 1 onwards; at Week 5 the mean change from baseline was −32.5 versus −14.2. Average 24‐h pain scores were low and remained stable in the range 3–4 in both treatment groups. Analgesic rescue medication use was similar between the groups. Patients receiving OXN PR used significantly lower mean daily doses of laxative rescue medication than those receiving OxyPR (P = 0.006). The number of CSBM in the OXN PR group approximately doubled compared with a 25% decrease in the OxyPR group. Comparable results to the total study population were reported in the cancer patient subgroup. CONCLUSIONS: OXN PR in daily doses of up to 160/80 mg significantly improves bowel function compared with equivalent doses of OxyPR while still providing comparable analgesic efficacy. SIGNIFICANCE: Effective analgesia can be achieved using oxycodone/naloxone PR up to 160/80 mg daily without compromising bowel function. A similar outcome was reported in cancer and non‐cancer patients. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-06-22 2017-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5600007/ /pubmed/28641363 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejp.1054 Text en © 2017 The Authors. European Journal of Pain published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Pain Federation ‐ EFIC® This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Research
Dupoiron, D.
Stachowiak, A.
Loewenstein, O.
Ellery, A.
Kremers, W.
Bosse, B.
Hopp, M.
A phase III randomized controlled study on the efficacy and improved bowel function of prolonged‐release (PR) oxycodone‐naloxone (up to 160/80 mg daily) vs oxycodone PR
title A phase III randomized controlled study on the efficacy and improved bowel function of prolonged‐release (PR) oxycodone‐naloxone (up to 160/80 mg daily) vs oxycodone PR
title_full A phase III randomized controlled study on the efficacy and improved bowel function of prolonged‐release (PR) oxycodone‐naloxone (up to 160/80 mg daily) vs oxycodone PR
title_fullStr A phase III randomized controlled study on the efficacy and improved bowel function of prolonged‐release (PR) oxycodone‐naloxone (up to 160/80 mg daily) vs oxycodone PR
title_full_unstemmed A phase III randomized controlled study on the efficacy and improved bowel function of prolonged‐release (PR) oxycodone‐naloxone (up to 160/80 mg daily) vs oxycodone PR
title_short A phase III randomized controlled study on the efficacy and improved bowel function of prolonged‐release (PR) oxycodone‐naloxone (up to 160/80 mg daily) vs oxycodone PR
title_sort phase iii randomized controlled study on the efficacy and improved bowel function of prolonged‐release (pr) oxycodone‐naloxone (up to 160/80 mg daily) vs oxycodone pr
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5600007/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28641363
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejp.1054
work_keys_str_mv AT dupoirond aphaseiiirandomizedcontrolledstudyontheefficacyandimprovedbowelfunctionofprolongedreleaseproxycodonenaloxoneupto16080mgdailyvsoxycodonepr
AT stachowiaka aphaseiiirandomizedcontrolledstudyontheefficacyandimprovedbowelfunctionofprolongedreleaseproxycodonenaloxoneupto16080mgdailyvsoxycodonepr
AT loewensteino aphaseiiirandomizedcontrolledstudyontheefficacyandimprovedbowelfunctionofprolongedreleaseproxycodonenaloxoneupto16080mgdailyvsoxycodonepr
AT ellerya aphaseiiirandomizedcontrolledstudyontheefficacyandimprovedbowelfunctionofprolongedreleaseproxycodonenaloxoneupto16080mgdailyvsoxycodonepr
AT kremersw aphaseiiirandomizedcontrolledstudyontheefficacyandimprovedbowelfunctionofprolongedreleaseproxycodonenaloxoneupto16080mgdailyvsoxycodonepr
AT bosseb aphaseiiirandomizedcontrolledstudyontheefficacyandimprovedbowelfunctionofprolongedreleaseproxycodonenaloxoneupto16080mgdailyvsoxycodonepr
AT hoppm aphaseiiirandomizedcontrolledstudyontheefficacyandimprovedbowelfunctionofprolongedreleaseproxycodonenaloxoneupto16080mgdailyvsoxycodonepr
AT dupoirond phaseiiirandomizedcontrolledstudyontheefficacyandimprovedbowelfunctionofprolongedreleaseproxycodonenaloxoneupto16080mgdailyvsoxycodonepr
AT stachowiaka phaseiiirandomizedcontrolledstudyontheefficacyandimprovedbowelfunctionofprolongedreleaseproxycodonenaloxoneupto16080mgdailyvsoxycodonepr
AT loewensteino phaseiiirandomizedcontrolledstudyontheefficacyandimprovedbowelfunctionofprolongedreleaseproxycodonenaloxoneupto16080mgdailyvsoxycodonepr
AT ellerya phaseiiirandomizedcontrolledstudyontheefficacyandimprovedbowelfunctionofprolongedreleaseproxycodonenaloxoneupto16080mgdailyvsoxycodonepr
AT kremersw phaseiiirandomizedcontrolledstudyontheefficacyandimprovedbowelfunctionofprolongedreleaseproxycodonenaloxoneupto16080mgdailyvsoxycodonepr
AT bosseb phaseiiirandomizedcontrolledstudyontheefficacyandimprovedbowelfunctionofprolongedreleaseproxycodonenaloxoneupto16080mgdailyvsoxycodonepr
AT hoppm phaseiiirandomizedcontrolledstudyontheefficacyandimprovedbowelfunctionofprolongedreleaseproxycodonenaloxoneupto16080mgdailyvsoxycodonepr