Cargando…
A phase III randomized controlled study on the efficacy and improved bowel function of prolonged‐release (PR) oxycodone‐naloxone (up to 160/80 mg daily) vs oxycodone PR
BACKGROUND: Oxycodone/naloxone (OXN PR) is a prolonged‐release formulation containing oxycodone and naloxone in a 2:1 ratio. This study aimed to evaluate the tolerability and efficacy of doses up to OXN160/80 mg PR compared with oxycodone prolonged‐release formulation (OxyPR) in a randomised control...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5600007/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28641363 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejp.1054 |
_version_ | 1783264167398998016 |
---|---|
author | Dupoiron, D. Stachowiak, A. Loewenstein, O. Ellery, A. Kremers, W. Bosse, B. Hopp, M. |
author_facet | Dupoiron, D. Stachowiak, A. Loewenstein, O. Ellery, A. Kremers, W. Bosse, B. Hopp, M. |
author_sort | Dupoiron, D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Oxycodone/naloxone (OXN PR) is a prolonged‐release formulation containing oxycodone and naloxone in a 2:1 ratio. This study aimed to evaluate the tolerability and efficacy of doses up to OXN160/80 mg PR compared with oxycodone prolonged‐release formulation (OxyPR) in a randomised controlled trial. METHODS: Two hundred and forty‐three patients were randomised to treatment with OXN PR (n = 123) or OxyPR (n = 120) during the 5‐week double‐blind study. Measured were: opioid‐induced constipation [bowel function index score (BFI)]; analgesic efficacy (NRS 0–10); daily laxative rescue medication use; rescue medication use, and the number of complete spontaneous bowel movements (CSBMs) per week. A subanalysis was conducted in cancer patients. RESULTS: Greater reductions in mean BFI scores were reported for the OXN PR group compared with OxyPR from Week 1 onwards; at Week 5 the mean change from baseline was −32.5 versus −14.2. Average 24‐h pain scores were low and remained stable in the range 3–4 in both treatment groups. Analgesic rescue medication use was similar between the groups. Patients receiving OXN PR used significantly lower mean daily doses of laxative rescue medication than those receiving OxyPR (P = 0.006). The number of CSBM in the OXN PR group approximately doubled compared with a 25% decrease in the OxyPR group. Comparable results to the total study population were reported in the cancer patient subgroup. CONCLUSIONS: OXN PR in daily doses of up to 160/80 mg significantly improves bowel function compared with equivalent doses of OxyPR while still providing comparable analgesic efficacy. SIGNIFICANCE: Effective analgesia can be achieved using oxycodone/naloxone PR up to 160/80 mg daily without compromising bowel function. A similar outcome was reported in cancer and non‐cancer patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5600007 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56000072017-10-02 A phase III randomized controlled study on the efficacy and improved bowel function of prolonged‐release (PR) oxycodone‐naloxone (up to 160/80 mg daily) vs oxycodone PR Dupoiron, D. Stachowiak, A. Loewenstein, O. Ellery, A. Kremers, W. Bosse, B. Hopp, M. Eur J Pain Original Research BACKGROUND: Oxycodone/naloxone (OXN PR) is a prolonged‐release formulation containing oxycodone and naloxone in a 2:1 ratio. This study aimed to evaluate the tolerability and efficacy of doses up to OXN160/80 mg PR compared with oxycodone prolonged‐release formulation (OxyPR) in a randomised controlled trial. METHODS: Two hundred and forty‐three patients were randomised to treatment with OXN PR (n = 123) or OxyPR (n = 120) during the 5‐week double‐blind study. Measured were: opioid‐induced constipation [bowel function index score (BFI)]; analgesic efficacy (NRS 0–10); daily laxative rescue medication use; rescue medication use, and the number of complete spontaneous bowel movements (CSBMs) per week. A subanalysis was conducted in cancer patients. RESULTS: Greater reductions in mean BFI scores were reported for the OXN PR group compared with OxyPR from Week 1 onwards; at Week 5 the mean change from baseline was −32.5 versus −14.2. Average 24‐h pain scores were low and remained stable in the range 3–4 in both treatment groups. Analgesic rescue medication use was similar between the groups. Patients receiving OXN PR used significantly lower mean daily doses of laxative rescue medication than those receiving OxyPR (P = 0.006). The number of CSBM in the OXN PR group approximately doubled compared with a 25% decrease in the OxyPR group. Comparable results to the total study population were reported in the cancer patient subgroup. CONCLUSIONS: OXN PR in daily doses of up to 160/80 mg significantly improves bowel function compared with equivalent doses of OxyPR while still providing comparable analgesic efficacy. SIGNIFICANCE: Effective analgesia can be achieved using oxycodone/naloxone PR up to 160/80 mg daily without compromising bowel function. A similar outcome was reported in cancer and non‐cancer patients. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-06-22 2017-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5600007/ /pubmed/28641363 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejp.1054 Text en © 2017 The Authors. European Journal of Pain published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Pain Federation ‐ EFIC® This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Dupoiron, D. Stachowiak, A. Loewenstein, O. Ellery, A. Kremers, W. Bosse, B. Hopp, M. A phase III randomized controlled study on the efficacy and improved bowel function of prolonged‐release (PR) oxycodone‐naloxone (up to 160/80 mg daily) vs oxycodone PR |
title | A phase III randomized controlled study on the efficacy and improved bowel function of prolonged‐release (PR) oxycodone‐naloxone (up to 160/80 mg daily) vs oxycodone PR |
title_full | A phase III randomized controlled study on the efficacy and improved bowel function of prolonged‐release (PR) oxycodone‐naloxone (up to 160/80 mg daily) vs oxycodone PR |
title_fullStr | A phase III randomized controlled study on the efficacy and improved bowel function of prolonged‐release (PR) oxycodone‐naloxone (up to 160/80 mg daily) vs oxycodone PR |
title_full_unstemmed | A phase III randomized controlled study on the efficacy and improved bowel function of prolonged‐release (PR) oxycodone‐naloxone (up to 160/80 mg daily) vs oxycodone PR |
title_short | A phase III randomized controlled study on the efficacy and improved bowel function of prolonged‐release (PR) oxycodone‐naloxone (up to 160/80 mg daily) vs oxycodone PR |
title_sort | phase iii randomized controlled study on the efficacy and improved bowel function of prolonged‐release (pr) oxycodone‐naloxone (up to 160/80 mg daily) vs oxycodone pr |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5600007/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28641363 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejp.1054 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dupoirond aphaseiiirandomizedcontrolledstudyontheefficacyandimprovedbowelfunctionofprolongedreleaseproxycodonenaloxoneupto16080mgdailyvsoxycodonepr AT stachowiaka aphaseiiirandomizedcontrolledstudyontheefficacyandimprovedbowelfunctionofprolongedreleaseproxycodonenaloxoneupto16080mgdailyvsoxycodonepr AT loewensteino aphaseiiirandomizedcontrolledstudyontheefficacyandimprovedbowelfunctionofprolongedreleaseproxycodonenaloxoneupto16080mgdailyvsoxycodonepr AT ellerya aphaseiiirandomizedcontrolledstudyontheefficacyandimprovedbowelfunctionofprolongedreleaseproxycodonenaloxoneupto16080mgdailyvsoxycodonepr AT kremersw aphaseiiirandomizedcontrolledstudyontheefficacyandimprovedbowelfunctionofprolongedreleaseproxycodonenaloxoneupto16080mgdailyvsoxycodonepr AT bosseb aphaseiiirandomizedcontrolledstudyontheefficacyandimprovedbowelfunctionofprolongedreleaseproxycodonenaloxoneupto16080mgdailyvsoxycodonepr AT hoppm aphaseiiirandomizedcontrolledstudyontheefficacyandimprovedbowelfunctionofprolongedreleaseproxycodonenaloxoneupto16080mgdailyvsoxycodonepr AT dupoirond phaseiiirandomizedcontrolledstudyontheefficacyandimprovedbowelfunctionofprolongedreleaseproxycodonenaloxoneupto16080mgdailyvsoxycodonepr AT stachowiaka phaseiiirandomizedcontrolledstudyontheefficacyandimprovedbowelfunctionofprolongedreleaseproxycodonenaloxoneupto16080mgdailyvsoxycodonepr AT loewensteino phaseiiirandomizedcontrolledstudyontheefficacyandimprovedbowelfunctionofprolongedreleaseproxycodonenaloxoneupto16080mgdailyvsoxycodonepr AT ellerya phaseiiirandomizedcontrolledstudyontheefficacyandimprovedbowelfunctionofprolongedreleaseproxycodonenaloxoneupto16080mgdailyvsoxycodonepr AT kremersw phaseiiirandomizedcontrolledstudyontheefficacyandimprovedbowelfunctionofprolongedreleaseproxycodonenaloxoneupto16080mgdailyvsoxycodonepr AT bosseb phaseiiirandomizedcontrolledstudyontheefficacyandimprovedbowelfunctionofprolongedreleaseproxycodonenaloxoneupto16080mgdailyvsoxycodonepr AT hoppm phaseiiirandomizedcontrolledstudyontheefficacyandimprovedbowelfunctionofprolongedreleaseproxycodonenaloxoneupto16080mgdailyvsoxycodonepr |