Cargando…

Influence of the Magnetic Field Strength on Image Contrast in Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR Imaging: Comparison between 1.5T and 3.0T

PURPOSE: We quantitatively investigated hepatic enhancement in gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA)-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging at 1.5T and 3.0T. METHODS: A total of 40 patients who underwent Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging were included in the study...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hata, Hirofumi, Inoue, Yusuke, Nakajima, Ai, Komi, Shotaro, Miyatake, Hiroki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Japanese Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5600069/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27151747
http://dx.doi.org/10.2463/mrms.mp.2015-0158
_version_ 1783264181188820992
author Hata, Hirofumi
Inoue, Yusuke
Nakajima, Ai
Komi, Shotaro
Miyatake, Hiroki
author_facet Hata, Hirofumi
Inoue, Yusuke
Nakajima, Ai
Komi, Shotaro
Miyatake, Hiroki
author_sort Hata, Hirofumi
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: We quantitatively investigated hepatic enhancement in gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA)-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging at 1.5T and 3.0T. METHODS: A total of 40 patients who underwent Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging were included in the study. Precontrast and hepatobiliary-phase images acquired at a low flip angle (FA, 12°) and hepatobiliary-phase images acquired at a high FA (30°) were analyzed. From these images, the liver-to-muscle signal intensity ratio (LMR) and liver-to-spleen signal intensity ratio (LSR) were estimated, and the contrast enhancement ratio (CER) was calculated from the liver signal, LMR, and LSR as the ratio of the low-FA hepatobiliary-phase value to the precontrast value. The coefficient of variance in the liver signal was determined to represent image noise. RESULTS: LMR and LSR indicated similar image contrast between 1.5T and 3.0T. A higher FA provided larger LMRs and LSRs, and the degree of the FA-dependent increase was similar between 1.5T and 3.0T. CER did not differ significantly between 1.5T and 3.0T, regardless of the calculation method. A better correlation to CER calculated from the liver signal was found for the LMR-based CER values than for the LSR-based CER. The coefficient of variance in the liver signal was significantly smaller at 3.0T for precontrast and low-FA hepatobiliary-phase images, but not for high-FA hepatobiliary-phase images. CONCLUSION: The indices of hepatic enhancement were similar between 1.5T and 3.0T, indicating that the magnetic field strength does not substantially influence image contrast after administration of Gd-EOB-DTPA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5600069
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Japanese Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56000692017-10-23 Influence of the Magnetic Field Strength on Image Contrast in Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR Imaging: Comparison between 1.5T and 3.0T Hata, Hirofumi Inoue, Yusuke Nakajima, Ai Komi, Shotaro Miyatake, Hiroki Magn Reson Med Sci Major Paper PURPOSE: We quantitatively investigated hepatic enhancement in gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA)-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging at 1.5T and 3.0T. METHODS: A total of 40 patients who underwent Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging were included in the study. Precontrast and hepatobiliary-phase images acquired at a low flip angle (FA, 12°) and hepatobiliary-phase images acquired at a high FA (30°) were analyzed. From these images, the liver-to-muscle signal intensity ratio (LMR) and liver-to-spleen signal intensity ratio (LSR) were estimated, and the contrast enhancement ratio (CER) was calculated from the liver signal, LMR, and LSR as the ratio of the low-FA hepatobiliary-phase value to the precontrast value. The coefficient of variance in the liver signal was determined to represent image noise. RESULTS: LMR and LSR indicated similar image contrast between 1.5T and 3.0T. A higher FA provided larger LMRs and LSRs, and the degree of the FA-dependent increase was similar between 1.5T and 3.0T. CER did not differ significantly between 1.5T and 3.0T, regardless of the calculation method. A better correlation to CER calculated from the liver signal was found for the LMR-based CER values than for the LSR-based CER. The coefficient of variance in the liver signal was significantly smaller at 3.0T for precontrast and low-FA hepatobiliary-phase images, but not for high-FA hepatobiliary-phase images. CONCLUSION: The indices of hepatic enhancement were similar between 1.5T and 3.0T, indicating that the magnetic field strength does not substantially influence image contrast after administration of Gd-EOB-DTPA. Japanese Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 2016-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5600069/ /pubmed/27151747 http://dx.doi.org/10.2463/mrms.mp.2015-0158 Text en © 2016 Japanese Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives International License.
spellingShingle Major Paper
Hata, Hirofumi
Inoue, Yusuke
Nakajima, Ai
Komi, Shotaro
Miyatake, Hiroki
Influence of the Magnetic Field Strength on Image Contrast in Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR Imaging: Comparison between 1.5T and 3.0T
title Influence of the Magnetic Field Strength on Image Contrast in Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR Imaging: Comparison between 1.5T and 3.0T
title_full Influence of the Magnetic Field Strength on Image Contrast in Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR Imaging: Comparison between 1.5T and 3.0T
title_fullStr Influence of the Magnetic Field Strength on Image Contrast in Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR Imaging: Comparison between 1.5T and 3.0T
title_full_unstemmed Influence of the Magnetic Field Strength on Image Contrast in Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR Imaging: Comparison between 1.5T and 3.0T
title_short Influence of the Magnetic Field Strength on Image Contrast in Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR Imaging: Comparison between 1.5T and 3.0T
title_sort influence of the magnetic field strength on image contrast in gd-eob-dtpa-enhanced mr imaging: comparison between 1.5t and 3.0t
topic Major Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5600069/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27151747
http://dx.doi.org/10.2463/mrms.mp.2015-0158
work_keys_str_mv AT hatahirofumi influenceofthemagneticfieldstrengthonimagecontrastingdeobdtpaenhancedmrimagingcomparisonbetween15tand30t
AT inoueyusuke influenceofthemagneticfieldstrengthonimagecontrastingdeobdtpaenhancedmrimagingcomparisonbetween15tand30t
AT nakajimaai influenceofthemagneticfieldstrengthonimagecontrastingdeobdtpaenhancedmrimagingcomparisonbetween15tand30t
AT komishotaro influenceofthemagneticfieldstrengthonimagecontrastingdeobdtpaenhancedmrimagingcomparisonbetween15tand30t
AT miyatakehiroki influenceofthemagneticfieldstrengthonimagecontrastingdeobdtpaenhancedmrimagingcomparisonbetween15tand30t