Cargando…
Influence of the Magnetic Field Strength on Image Contrast in Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR Imaging: Comparison between 1.5T and 3.0T
PURPOSE: We quantitatively investigated hepatic enhancement in gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA)-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging at 1.5T and 3.0T. METHODS: A total of 40 patients who underwent Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging were included in the study...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Japanese Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5600069/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27151747 http://dx.doi.org/10.2463/mrms.mp.2015-0158 |
_version_ | 1783264181188820992 |
---|---|
author | Hata, Hirofumi Inoue, Yusuke Nakajima, Ai Komi, Shotaro Miyatake, Hiroki |
author_facet | Hata, Hirofumi Inoue, Yusuke Nakajima, Ai Komi, Shotaro Miyatake, Hiroki |
author_sort | Hata, Hirofumi |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: We quantitatively investigated hepatic enhancement in gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA)-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging at 1.5T and 3.0T. METHODS: A total of 40 patients who underwent Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging were included in the study. Precontrast and hepatobiliary-phase images acquired at a low flip angle (FA, 12°) and hepatobiliary-phase images acquired at a high FA (30°) were analyzed. From these images, the liver-to-muscle signal intensity ratio (LMR) and liver-to-spleen signal intensity ratio (LSR) were estimated, and the contrast enhancement ratio (CER) was calculated from the liver signal, LMR, and LSR as the ratio of the low-FA hepatobiliary-phase value to the precontrast value. The coefficient of variance in the liver signal was determined to represent image noise. RESULTS: LMR and LSR indicated similar image contrast between 1.5T and 3.0T. A higher FA provided larger LMRs and LSRs, and the degree of the FA-dependent increase was similar between 1.5T and 3.0T. CER did not differ significantly between 1.5T and 3.0T, regardless of the calculation method. A better correlation to CER calculated from the liver signal was found for the LMR-based CER values than for the LSR-based CER. The coefficient of variance in the liver signal was significantly smaller at 3.0T for precontrast and low-FA hepatobiliary-phase images, but not for high-FA hepatobiliary-phase images. CONCLUSION: The indices of hepatic enhancement were similar between 1.5T and 3.0T, indicating that the magnetic field strength does not substantially influence image contrast after administration of Gd-EOB-DTPA. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5600069 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Japanese Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56000692017-10-23 Influence of the Magnetic Field Strength on Image Contrast in Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR Imaging: Comparison between 1.5T and 3.0T Hata, Hirofumi Inoue, Yusuke Nakajima, Ai Komi, Shotaro Miyatake, Hiroki Magn Reson Med Sci Major Paper PURPOSE: We quantitatively investigated hepatic enhancement in gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA)-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging at 1.5T and 3.0T. METHODS: A total of 40 patients who underwent Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging were included in the study. Precontrast and hepatobiliary-phase images acquired at a low flip angle (FA, 12°) and hepatobiliary-phase images acquired at a high FA (30°) were analyzed. From these images, the liver-to-muscle signal intensity ratio (LMR) and liver-to-spleen signal intensity ratio (LSR) were estimated, and the contrast enhancement ratio (CER) was calculated from the liver signal, LMR, and LSR as the ratio of the low-FA hepatobiliary-phase value to the precontrast value. The coefficient of variance in the liver signal was determined to represent image noise. RESULTS: LMR and LSR indicated similar image contrast between 1.5T and 3.0T. A higher FA provided larger LMRs and LSRs, and the degree of the FA-dependent increase was similar between 1.5T and 3.0T. CER did not differ significantly between 1.5T and 3.0T, regardless of the calculation method. A better correlation to CER calculated from the liver signal was found for the LMR-based CER values than for the LSR-based CER. The coefficient of variance in the liver signal was significantly smaller at 3.0T for precontrast and low-FA hepatobiliary-phase images, but not for high-FA hepatobiliary-phase images. CONCLUSION: The indices of hepatic enhancement were similar between 1.5T and 3.0T, indicating that the magnetic field strength does not substantially influence image contrast after administration of Gd-EOB-DTPA. Japanese Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 2016-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5600069/ /pubmed/27151747 http://dx.doi.org/10.2463/mrms.mp.2015-0158 Text en © 2016 Japanese Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives International License. |
spellingShingle | Major Paper Hata, Hirofumi Inoue, Yusuke Nakajima, Ai Komi, Shotaro Miyatake, Hiroki Influence of the Magnetic Field Strength on Image Contrast in Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR Imaging: Comparison between 1.5T and 3.0T |
title | Influence of the Magnetic Field Strength on Image Contrast in Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR Imaging: Comparison between 1.5T and 3.0T |
title_full | Influence of the Magnetic Field Strength on Image Contrast in Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR Imaging: Comparison between 1.5T and 3.0T |
title_fullStr | Influence of the Magnetic Field Strength on Image Contrast in Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR Imaging: Comparison between 1.5T and 3.0T |
title_full_unstemmed | Influence of the Magnetic Field Strength on Image Contrast in Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR Imaging: Comparison between 1.5T and 3.0T |
title_short | Influence of the Magnetic Field Strength on Image Contrast in Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR Imaging: Comparison between 1.5T and 3.0T |
title_sort | influence of the magnetic field strength on image contrast in gd-eob-dtpa-enhanced mr imaging: comparison between 1.5t and 3.0t |
topic | Major Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5600069/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27151747 http://dx.doi.org/10.2463/mrms.mp.2015-0158 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hatahirofumi influenceofthemagneticfieldstrengthonimagecontrastingdeobdtpaenhancedmrimagingcomparisonbetween15tand30t AT inoueyusuke influenceofthemagneticfieldstrengthonimagecontrastingdeobdtpaenhancedmrimagingcomparisonbetween15tand30t AT nakajimaai influenceofthemagneticfieldstrengthonimagecontrastingdeobdtpaenhancedmrimagingcomparisonbetween15tand30t AT komishotaro influenceofthemagneticfieldstrengthonimagecontrastingdeobdtpaenhancedmrimagingcomparisonbetween15tand30t AT miyatakehiroki influenceofthemagneticfieldstrengthonimagecontrastingdeobdtpaenhancedmrimagingcomparisonbetween15tand30t |