Cargando…

Resting vs. active: a meta‐analysis of the intra‐ and inter‐specific associations between minimum, sustained, and maximum metabolic rates in vertebrates

1. Variation in aerobic capacity has far reaching consequences for the physiology, ecology, and evolution of vertebrates. Whether at rest or active, animals are constrained to operate within the energetic bounds determined by their minimum (minMR) and sustained or maximum metabolic rates (upperMR)....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Auer, Sonya K., Killen, Shaun S., Rezende, Enrico L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5600087/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28979057
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.12879
_version_ 1783264185411436544
author Auer, Sonya K.
Killen, Shaun S.
Rezende, Enrico L.
author_facet Auer, Sonya K.
Killen, Shaun S.
Rezende, Enrico L.
author_sort Auer, Sonya K.
collection PubMed
description 1. Variation in aerobic capacity has far reaching consequences for the physiology, ecology, and evolution of vertebrates. Whether at rest or active, animals are constrained to operate within the energetic bounds determined by their minimum (minMR) and sustained or maximum metabolic rates (upperMR). MinMR and upperMR can differ considerably among individuals and species but are often presumed to be mechanistically linked to one another. Specifically, minMR is thought to reflect the idling cost of the machinery needed to support upperMR. However, previous analyses based on limited datasets have come to conflicting conclusions regarding the generality and strength of their association. 2. Here we conduct the first comprehensive assessment of their relationship, based on a large number of published estimates of both the intra‐specific (n = 176) and inter‐specific (n = 41) phenotypic correlations between minMR and upperMR, estimated as either exercise‐induced maximum metabolic rate (VO (2)max), cold‐induced summit metabolic rate (Msum), or daily energy expenditure (DEE). 3. Our meta‐analysis shows that there is a general positive association between minMR and upperMR that is shared among vertebrate taxonomic classes. However, there was stronger evidence for intra‐specific correlations between minMR and Msum and between minMR and DEE than there was for a correlation between minMR and VO (2)max across different taxa. As expected, inter‐specific correlation estimates were consistently higher than intra‐specific estimates across all traits and vertebrate classes. 4. An interesting exception to this general trend was observed in mammals, which contrast with birds and exhibit no correlation between minMR and Msum. We speculate that this is due to the evolution and recruitment of brown fat as a thermogenic tissue, which illustrates how some species and lineages might circumvent this seemingly general association. 5. We conclude that, in spite of some variability across taxa and traits, the contention that minMR and upperMR are positively correlated generally holds true both within and across vertebrate species. Ecological and comparative studies should therefore take into consideration the possibility that variation in any one of these traits might partly reflect correlated responses to selection on other metabolic parameters. A lay summary is available for this article.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5600087
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56000872017-10-02 Resting vs. active: a meta‐analysis of the intra‐ and inter‐specific associations between minimum, sustained, and maximum metabolic rates in vertebrates Auer, Sonya K. Killen, Shaun S. Rezende, Enrico L. Funct Ecol Animal Physiological Ecology 1. Variation in aerobic capacity has far reaching consequences for the physiology, ecology, and evolution of vertebrates. Whether at rest or active, animals are constrained to operate within the energetic bounds determined by their minimum (minMR) and sustained or maximum metabolic rates (upperMR). MinMR and upperMR can differ considerably among individuals and species but are often presumed to be mechanistically linked to one another. Specifically, minMR is thought to reflect the idling cost of the machinery needed to support upperMR. However, previous analyses based on limited datasets have come to conflicting conclusions regarding the generality and strength of their association. 2. Here we conduct the first comprehensive assessment of their relationship, based on a large number of published estimates of both the intra‐specific (n = 176) and inter‐specific (n = 41) phenotypic correlations between minMR and upperMR, estimated as either exercise‐induced maximum metabolic rate (VO (2)max), cold‐induced summit metabolic rate (Msum), or daily energy expenditure (DEE). 3. Our meta‐analysis shows that there is a general positive association between minMR and upperMR that is shared among vertebrate taxonomic classes. However, there was stronger evidence for intra‐specific correlations between minMR and Msum and between minMR and DEE than there was for a correlation between minMR and VO (2)max across different taxa. As expected, inter‐specific correlation estimates were consistently higher than intra‐specific estimates across all traits and vertebrate classes. 4. An interesting exception to this general trend was observed in mammals, which contrast with birds and exhibit no correlation between minMR and Msum. We speculate that this is due to the evolution and recruitment of brown fat as a thermogenic tissue, which illustrates how some species and lineages might circumvent this seemingly general association. 5. We conclude that, in spite of some variability across taxa and traits, the contention that minMR and upperMR are positively correlated generally holds true both within and across vertebrate species. Ecological and comparative studies should therefore take into consideration the possibility that variation in any one of these traits might partly reflect correlated responses to selection on other metabolic parameters. A lay summary is available for this article. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-05-02 2017-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5600087/ /pubmed/28979057 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.12879 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Functional Ecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Ecological Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Animal Physiological Ecology
Auer, Sonya K.
Killen, Shaun S.
Rezende, Enrico L.
Resting vs. active: a meta‐analysis of the intra‐ and inter‐specific associations between minimum, sustained, and maximum metabolic rates in vertebrates
title Resting vs. active: a meta‐analysis of the intra‐ and inter‐specific associations between minimum, sustained, and maximum metabolic rates in vertebrates
title_full Resting vs. active: a meta‐analysis of the intra‐ and inter‐specific associations between minimum, sustained, and maximum metabolic rates in vertebrates
title_fullStr Resting vs. active: a meta‐analysis of the intra‐ and inter‐specific associations between minimum, sustained, and maximum metabolic rates in vertebrates
title_full_unstemmed Resting vs. active: a meta‐analysis of the intra‐ and inter‐specific associations between minimum, sustained, and maximum metabolic rates in vertebrates
title_short Resting vs. active: a meta‐analysis of the intra‐ and inter‐specific associations between minimum, sustained, and maximum metabolic rates in vertebrates
title_sort resting vs. active: a meta‐analysis of the intra‐ and inter‐specific associations between minimum, sustained, and maximum metabolic rates in vertebrates
topic Animal Physiological Ecology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5600087/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28979057
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.12879
work_keys_str_mv AT auersonyak restingvsactiveametaanalysisoftheintraandinterspecificassociationsbetweenminimumsustainedandmaximummetabolicratesinvertebrates
AT killenshauns restingvsactiveametaanalysisoftheintraandinterspecificassociationsbetweenminimumsustainedandmaximummetabolicratesinvertebrates
AT rezendeenricol restingvsactiveametaanalysisoftheintraandinterspecificassociationsbetweenminimumsustainedandmaximummetabolicratesinvertebrates