Cargando…
Does efavirenz replacement improve neurological function in treated HIV infection?
OBJECTIVES: The contribution of specific antiretroviral drugs to cognitive function in HIV‐infected people remains poorly understood. Efavirenz (EFV) may plausibly cause cognitive impairment. The objective of this study was therefore to determine whether chronic EFV therapy is a modifier of neurocog...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5600135/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28247479 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hiv.12503 |
_version_ | 1783264196508516352 |
---|---|
author | Payne, B Chadwick, TJ Blamire, A Anderson, KN Parikh, J Qian, J Hynes, AM Wilkinson, J Price, DA |
author_facet | Payne, B Chadwick, TJ Blamire, A Anderson, KN Parikh, J Qian, J Hynes, AM Wilkinson, J Price, DA |
author_sort | Payne, B |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The contribution of specific antiretroviral drugs to cognitive function in HIV‐infected people remains poorly understood. Efavirenz (EFV) may plausibly cause cognitive impairment. The objective of this study was therefore to determine whether chronic EFV therapy is a modifier of neurocognitive and neurometabolic function in the setting of suppressive highly active antiretroviral therapy. METHODS: We performed an open‐label phase IV controlled trial. Adult subjects who were stable on suppressive EFV therapy for at least 6 months were switched to ritonavir‐boosted lopinavir (LPV/r) with no change in the nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) backbone. The following parameters were assessed before and 10 weeks after therapy switch: cognitive function (by CogState(®) computerized battery); brain metabolites (by proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy); brain activity [by attentional processing task‐based functional magnetic resonance imaging]; and sleep quantity and quality [by sleep diary, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and Epworth Sleepiness Scale]. RESULTS: Sixteen subjects completed the study. Despite most subjects (81%) self‐reporting memory problems at baseline, cognitive function, brain metabolites, and brain activity showed no change at 10 weeks after switch. Sleep quality improved on switch off EFV [mean PSQI (standard deviation): EFV, 8.5 (6.5); LPV/r, 5.8 (5.5); mean difference −0.4; 95% confidence interval −6.0 to −0.7]. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to assess the effects of chronic EFV therapy on neurological function in a controlled setting. We conclude that EFV withdrawal is unlikely to result in significant modification of neurocognitive function in otherwise stable HIV‐infected people. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5600135 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56001352017-10-02 Does efavirenz replacement improve neurological function in treated HIV infection? Payne, B Chadwick, TJ Blamire, A Anderson, KN Parikh, J Qian, J Hynes, AM Wilkinson, J Price, DA HIV Med Short Communications OBJECTIVES: The contribution of specific antiretroviral drugs to cognitive function in HIV‐infected people remains poorly understood. Efavirenz (EFV) may plausibly cause cognitive impairment. The objective of this study was therefore to determine whether chronic EFV therapy is a modifier of neurocognitive and neurometabolic function in the setting of suppressive highly active antiretroviral therapy. METHODS: We performed an open‐label phase IV controlled trial. Adult subjects who were stable on suppressive EFV therapy for at least 6 months were switched to ritonavir‐boosted lopinavir (LPV/r) with no change in the nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) backbone. The following parameters were assessed before and 10 weeks after therapy switch: cognitive function (by CogState(®) computerized battery); brain metabolites (by proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy); brain activity [by attentional processing task‐based functional magnetic resonance imaging]; and sleep quantity and quality [by sleep diary, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and Epworth Sleepiness Scale]. RESULTS: Sixteen subjects completed the study. Despite most subjects (81%) self‐reporting memory problems at baseline, cognitive function, brain metabolites, and brain activity showed no change at 10 weeks after switch. Sleep quality improved on switch off EFV [mean PSQI (standard deviation): EFV, 8.5 (6.5); LPV/r, 5.8 (5.5); mean difference −0.4; 95% confidence interval −6.0 to −0.7]. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to assess the effects of chronic EFV therapy on neurological function in a controlled setting. We conclude that EFV withdrawal is unlikely to result in significant modification of neurocognitive function in otherwise stable HIV‐infected people. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-03-01 2017-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5600135/ /pubmed/28247479 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hiv.12503 Text en © 2017 The Authors HIV Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British HIV Association This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Short Communications Payne, B Chadwick, TJ Blamire, A Anderson, KN Parikh, J Qian, J Hynes, AM Wilkinson, J Price, DA Does efavirenz replacement improve neurological function in treated HIV infection? |
title | Does efavirenz replacement improve neurological function in treated HIV infection? |
title_full | Does efavirenz replacement improve neurological function in treated HIV infection? |
title_fullStr | Does efavirenz replacement improve neurological function in treated HIV infection? |
title_full_unstemmed | Does efavirenz replacement improve neurological function in treated HIV infection? |
title_short | Does efavirenz replacement improve neurological function in treated HIV infection? |
title_sort | does efavirenz replacement improve neurological function in treated hiv infection? |
topic | Short Communications |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5600135/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28247479 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hiv.12503 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT payneb doesefavirenzreplacementimproveneurologicalfunctionintreatedhivinfection AT chadwicktj doesefavirenzreplacementimproveneurologicalfunctionintreatedhivinfection AT blamirea doesefavirenzreplacementimproveneurologicalfunctionintreatedhivinfection AT andersonkn doesefavirenzreplacementimproveneurologicalfunctionintreatedhivinfection AT parikhj doesefavirenzreplacementimproveneurologicalfunctionintreatedhivinfection AT qianj doesefavirenzreplacementimproveneurologicalfunctionintreatedhivinfection AT hynesam doesefavirenzreplacementimproveneurologicalfunctionintreatedhivinfection AT wilkinsonj doesefavirenzreplacementimproveneurologicalfunctionintreatedhivinfection AT priceda doesefavirenzreplacementimproveneurologicalfunctionintreatedhivinfection AT doesefavirenzreplacementimproveneurologicalfunctionintreatedhivinfection |