Cargando…

Does efavirenz replacement improve neurological function in treated HIV infection?

OBJECTIVES: The contribution of specific antiretroviral drugs to cognitive function in HIV‐infected people remains poorly understood. Efavirenz (EFV) may plausibly cause cognitive impairment. The objective of this study was therefore to determine whether chronic EFV therapy is a modifier of neurocog...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Payne, B, Chadwick, TJ, Blamire, A, Anderson, KN, Parikh, J, Qian, J, Hynes, AM, Wilkinson, J, Price, DA
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5600135/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28247479
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hiv.12503
_version_ 1783264196508516352
author Payne, B
Chadwick, TJ
Blamire, A
Anderson, KN
Parikh, J
Qian, J
Hynes, AM
Wilkinson, J
Price, DA
author_facet Payne, B
Chadwick, TJ
Blamire, A
Anderson, KN
Parikh, J
Qian, J
Hynes, AM
Wilkinson, J
Price, DA
author_sort Payne, B
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The contribution of specific antiretroviral drugs to cognitive function in HIV‐infected people remains poorly understood. Efavirenz (EFV) may plausibly cause cognitive impairment. The objective of this study was therefore to determine whether chronic EFV therapy is a modifier of neurocognitive and neurometabolic function in the setting of suppressive highly active antiretroviral therapy. METHODS: We performed an open‐label phase IV controlled trial. Adult subjects who were stable on suppressive EFV therapy for at least 6 months were switched to ritonavir‐boosted lopinavir (LPV/r) with no change in the nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) backbone. The following parameters were assessed before and 10 weeks after therapy switch: cognitive function (by CogState(®) computerized battery); brain metabolites (by proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy); brain activity [by attentional processing task‐based functional magnetic resonance imaging]; and sleep quantity and quality [by sleep diary, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and Epworth Sleepiness Scale]. RESULTS: Sixteen subjects completed the study. Despite most subjects (81%) self‐reporting memory problems at baseline, cognitive function, brain metabolites, and brain activity showed no change at 10 weeks after switch. Sleep quality improved on switch off EFV [mean PSQI (standard deviation): EFV, 8.5 (6.5); LPV/r, 5.8 (5.5); mean difference −0.4; 95% confidence interval −6.0 to −0.7]. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to assess the effects of chronic EFV therapy on neurological function in a controlled setting. We conclude that EFV withdrawal is unlikely to result in significant modification of neurocognitive function in otherwise stable HIV‐infected people.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5600135
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56001352017-10-02 Does efavirenz replacement improve neurological function in treated HIV infection? Payne, B Chadwick, TJ Blamire, A Anderson, KN Parikh, J Qian, J Hynes, AM Wilkinson, J Price, DA HIV Med Short Communications OBJECTIVES: The contribution of specific antiretroviral drugs to cognitive function in HIV‐infected people remains poorly understood. Efavirenz (EFV) may plausibly cause cognitive impairment. The objective of this study was therefore to determine whether chronic EFV therapy is a modifier of neurocognitive and neurometabolic function in the setting of suppressive highly active antiretroviral therapy. METHODS: We performed an open‐label phase IV controlled trial. Adult subjects who were stable on suppressive EFV therapy for at least 6 months were switched to ritonavir‐boosted lopinavir (LPV/r) with no change in the nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) backbone. The following parameters were assessed before and 10 weeks after therapy switch: cognitive function (by CogState(®) computerized battery); brain metabolites (by proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy); brain activity [by attentional processing task‐based functional magnetic resonance imaging]; and sleep quantity and quality [by sleep diary, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and Epworth Sleepiness Scale]. RESULTS: Sixteen subjects completed the study. Despite most subjects (81%) self‐reporting memory problems at baseline, cognitive function, brain metabolites, and brain activity showed no change at 10 weeks after switch. Sleep quality improved on switch off EFV [mean PSQI (standard deviation): EFV, 8.5 (6.5); LPV/r, 5.8 (5.5); mean difference −0.4; 95% confidence interval −6.0 to −0.7]. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to assess the effects of chronic EFV therapy on neurological function in a controlled setting. We conclude that EFV withdrawal is unlikely to result in significant modification of neurocognitive function in otherwise stable HIV‐infected people. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-03-01 2017-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5600135/ /pubmed/28247479 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hiv.12503 Text en © 2017 The Authors HIV Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British HIV Association This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Short Communications
Payne, B
Chadwick, TJ
Blamire, A
Anderson, KN
Parikh, J
Qian, J
Hynes, AM
Wilkinson, J
Price, DA
Does efavirenz replacement improve neurological function in treated HIV infection?
title Does efavirenz replacement improve neurological function in treated HIV infection?
title_full Does efavirenz replacement improve neurological function in treated HIV infection?
title_fullStr Does efavirenz replacement improve neurological function in treated HIV infection?
title_full_unstemmed Does efavirenz replacement improve neurological function in treated HIV infection?
title_short Does efavirenz replacement improve neurological function in treated HIV infection?
title_sort does efavirenz replacement improve neurological function in treated hiv infection?
topic Short Communications
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5600135/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28247479
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hiv.12503
work_keys_str_mv AT payneb doesefavirenzreplacementimproveneurologicalfunctionintreatedhivinfection
AT chadwicktj doesefavirenzreplacementimproveneurologicalfunctionintreatedhivinfection
AT blamirea doesefavirenzreplacementimproveneurologicalfunctionintreatedhivinfection
AT andersonkn doesefavirenzreplacementimproveneurologicalfunctionintreatedhivinfection
AT parikhj doesefavirenzreplacementimproveneurologicalfunctionintreatedhivinfection
AT qianj doesefavirenzreplacementimproveneurologicalfunctionintreatedhivinfection
AT hynesam doesefavirenzreplacementimproveneurologicalfunctionintreatedhivinfection
AT wilkinsonj doesefavirenzreplacementimproveneurologicalfunctionintreatedhivinfection
AT priceda doesefavirenzreplacementimproveneurologicalfunctionintreatedhivinfection
AT doesefavirenzreplacementimproveneurologicalfunctionintreatedhivinfection