Cargando…
Recurrent Convolutional Neural Networks: A Better Model of Biological Object Recognition
Feedforward neural networks provide the dominant model of how the brain performs visual object recognition. However, these networks lack the lateral and feedback connections, and the resulting recurrent neuronal dynamics, of the ventral visual pathway in the human and non-human primate brain. Here w...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5600938/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28955272 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01551 |
_version_ | 1783264297066954752 |
---|---|
author | Spoerer, Courtney J. McClure, Patrick Kriegeskorte, Nikolaus |
author_facet | Spoerer, Courtney J. McClure, Patrick Kriegeskorte, Nikolaus |
author_sort | Spoerer, Courtney J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Feedforward neural networks provide the dominant model of how the brain performs visual object recognition. However, these networks lack the lateral and feedback connections, and the resulting recurrent neuronal dynamics, of the ventral visual pathway in the human and non-human primate brain. Here we investigate recurrent convolutional neural networks with bottom-up (B), lateral (L), and top-down (T) connections. Combining these types of connections yields four architectures (B, BT, BL, and BLT), which we systematically test and compare. We hypothesized that recurrent dynamics might improve recognition performance in the challenging scenario of partial occlusion. We introduce two novel occluded object recognition tasks to test the efficacy of the models, digit clutter (where multiple target digits occlude one another) and digit debris (where target digits are occluded by digit fragments). We find that recurrent neural networks outperform feedforward control models (approximately matched in parametric complexity) at recognizing objects, both in the absence of occlusion and in all occlusion conditions. Recurrent networks were also found to be more robust to the inclusion of additive Gaussian noise. Recurrent neural networks are better in two respects: (1) they are more neurobiologically realistic than their feedforward counterparts; (2) they are better in terms of their ability to recognize objects, especially under challenging conditions. This work shows that computer vision can benefit from using recurrent convolutional architectures and suggests that the ubiquitous recurrent connections in biological brains are essential for task performance. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5600938 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56009382017-09-27 Recurrent Convolutional Neural Networks: A Better Model of Biological Object Recognition Spoerer, Courtney J. McClure, Patrick Kriegeskorte, Nikolaus Front Psychol Psychology Feedforward neural networks provide the dominant model of how the brain performs visual object recognition. However, these networks lack the lateral and feedback connections, and the resulting recurrent neuronal dynamics, of the ventral visual pathway in the human and non-human primate brain. Here we investigate recurrent convolutional neural networks with bottom-up (B), lateral (L), and top-down (T) connections. Combining these types of connections yields four architectures (B, BT, BL, and BLT), which we systematically test and compare. We hypothesized that recurrent dynamics might improve recognition performance in the challenging scenario of partial occlusion. We introduce two novel occluded object recognition tasks to test the efficacy of the models, digit clutter (where multiple target digits occlude one another) and digit debris (where target digits are occluded by digit fragments). We find that recurrent neural networks outperform feedforward control models (approximately matched in parametric complexity) at recognizing objects, both in the absence of occlusion and in all occlusion conditions. Recurrent networks were also found to be more robust to the inclusion of additive Gaussian noise. Recurrent neural networks are better in two respects: (1) they are more neurobiologically realistic than their feedforward counterparts; (2) they are better in terms of their ability to recognize objects, especially under challenging conditions. This work shows that computer vision can benefit from using recurrent convolutional architectures and suggests that the ubiquitous recurrent connections in biological brains are essential for task performance. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-09-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5600938/ /pubmed/28955272 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01551 Text en Copyright © 2017 Spoerer, McClure and Kriegeskorte. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Spoerer, Courtney J. McClure, Patrick Kriegeskorte, Nikolaus Recurrent Convolutional Neural Networks: A Better Model of Biological Object Recognition |
title | Recurrent Convolutional Neural Networks: A Better Model of Biological Object Recognition |
title_full | Recurrent Convolutional Neural Networks: A Better Model of Biological Object Recognition |
title_fullStr | Recurrent Convolutional Neural Networks: A Better Model of Biological Object Recognition |
title_full_unstemmed | Recurrent Convolutional Neural Networks: A Better Model of Biological Object Recognition |
title_short | Recurrent Convolutional Neural Networks: A Better Model of Biological Object Recognition |
title_sort | recurrent convolutional neural networks: a better model of biological object recognition |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5600938/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28955272 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01551 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT spoerercourtneyj recurrentconvolutionalneuralnetworksabettermodelofbiologicalobjectrecognition AT mcclurepatrick recurrentconvolutionalneuralnetworksabettermodelofbiologicalobjectrecognition AT kriegeskortenikolaus recurrentconvolutionalneuralnetworksabettermodelofbiologicalobjectrecognition |