Cargando…

Recurrent Convolutional Neural Networks: A Better Model of Biological Object Recognition

Feedforward neural networks provide the dominant model of how the brain performs visual object recognition. However, these networks lack the lateral and feedback connections, and the resulting recurrent neuronal dynamics, of the ventral visual pathway in the human and non-human primate brain. Here w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Spoerer, Courtney J., McClure, Patrick, Kriegeskorte, Nikolaus
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5600938/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28955272
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01551
_version_ 1783264297066954752
author Spoerer, Courtney J.
McClure, Patrick
Kriegeskorte, Nikolaus
author_facet Spoerer, Courtney J.
McClure, Patrick
Kriegeskorte, Nikolaus
author_sort Spoerer, Courtney J.
collection PubMed
description Feedforward neural networks provide the dominant model of how the brain performs visual object recognition. However, these networks lack the lateral and feedback connections, and the resulting recurrent neuronal dynamics, of the ventral visual pathway in the human and non-human primate brain. Here we investigate recurrent convolutional neural networks with bottom-up (B), lateral (L), and top-down (T) connections. Combining these types of connections yields four architectures (B, BT, BL, and BLT), which we systematically test and compare. We hypothesized that recurrent dynamics might improve recognition performance in the challenging scenario of partial occlusion. We introduce two novel occluded object recognition tasks to test the efficacy of the models, digit clutter (where multiple target digits occlude one another) and digit debris (where target digits are occluded by digit fragments). We find that recurrent neural networks outperform feedforward control models (approximately matched in parametric complexity) at recognizing objects, both in the absence of occlusion and in all occlusion conditions. Recurrent networks were also found to be more robust to the inclusion of additive Gaussian noise. Recurrent neural networks are better in two respects: (1) they are more neurobiologically realistic than their feedforward counterparts; (2) they are better in terms of their ability to recognize objects, especially under challenging conditions. This work shows that computer vision can benefit from using recurrent convolutional architectures and suggests that the ubiquitous recurrent connections in biological brains are essential for task performance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5600938
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56009382017-09-27 Recurrent Convolutional Neural Networks: A Better Model of Biological Object Recognition Spoerer, Courtney J. McClure, Patrick Kriegeskorte, Nikolaus Front Psychol Psychology Feedforward neural networks provide the dominant model of how the brain performs visual object recognition. However, these networks lack the lateral and feedback connections, and the resulting recurrent neuronal dynamics, of the ventral visual pathway in the human and non-human primate brain. Here we investigate recurrent convolutional neural networks with bottom-up (B), lateral (L), and top-down (T) connections. Combining these types of connections yields four architectures (B, BT, BL, and BLT), which we systematically test and compare. We hypothesized that recurrent dynamics might improve recognition performance in the challenging scenario of partial occlusion. We introduce two novel occluded object recognition tasks to test the efficacy of the models, digit clutter (where multiple target digits occlude one another) and digit debris (where target digits are occluded by digit fragments). We find that recurrent neural networks outperform feedforward control models (approximately matched in parametric complexity) at recognizing objects, both in the absence of occlusion and in all occlusion conditions. Recurrent networks were also found to be more robust to the inclusion of additive Gaussian noise. Recurrent neural networks are better in two respects: (1) they are more neurobiologically realistic than their feedforward counterparts; (2) they are better in terms of their ability to recognize objects, especially under challenging conditions. This work shows that computer vision can benefit from using recurrent convolutional architectures and suggests that the ubiquitous recurrent connections in biological brains are essential for task performance. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-09-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5600938/ /pubmed/28955272 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01551 Text en Copyright © 2017 Spoerer, McClure and Kriegeskorte. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Spoerer, Courtney J.
McClure, Patrick
Kriegeskorte, Nikolaus
Recurrent Convolutional Neural Networks: A Better Model of Biological Object Recognition
title Recurrent Convolutional Neural Networks: A Better Model of Biological Object Recognition
title_full Recurrent Convolutional Neural Networks: A Better Model of Biological Object Recognition
title_fullStr Recurrent Convolutional Neural Networks: A Better Model of Biological Object Recognition
title_full_unstemmed Recurrent Convolutional Neural Networks: A Better Model of Biological Object Recognition
title_short Recurrent Convolutional Neural Networks: A Better Model of Biological Object Recognition
title_sort recurrent convolutional neural networks: a better model of biological object recognition
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5600938/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28955272
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01551
work_keys_str_mv AT spoerercourtneyj recurrentconvolutionalneuralnetworksabettermodelofbiologicalobjectrecognition
AT mcclurepatrick recurrentconvolutionalneuralnetworksabettermodelofbiologicalobjectrecognition
AT kriegeskortenikolaus recurrentconvolutionalneuralnetworksabettermodelofbiologicalobjectrecognition