Cargando…
A Systematic Review on the Existing Screening Pathways for Lynch Syndrome Identification
BACKGROUND: Lynch syndrome (LS) is the most common hereditary colon cancer syndrome, accounting for 3–5% of colorectal cancer (CRC) cases, and it is associated with the development of other cancers. Early detection of individuals with LS is relevant, since they can take advantage of life-saving inte...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5600943/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28955708 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2017.00243 |
_version_ | 1783264298218291200 |
---|---|
author | Tognetto, Alessia Michelazzo, Maria Benedetta Calabró, Giovanna Elisa Unim, Brigid Di Marco, Marco Ricciardi, Walter Pastorino, Roberta Boccia, Stefania |
author_facet | Tognetto, Alessia Michelazzo, Maria Benedetta Calabró, Giovanna Elisa Unim, Brigid Di Marco, Marco Ricciardi, Walter Pastorino, Roberta Boccia, Stefania |
author_sort | Tognetto, Alessia |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Lynch syndrome (LS) is the most common hereditary colon cancer syndrome, accounting for 3–5% of colorectal cancer (CRC) cases, and it is associated with the development of other cancers. Early detection of individuals with LS is relevant, since they can take advantage of life-saving intensive care surveillance. The debate regarding the best screening policy, however, is far from being concluded. This prompted us to conduct a systematic review of the existing screening pathways for LS. METHODS: We performed a systematic search of MEDLINE, ISI Web of Science, and SCOPUS online databases for the existing screening pathways for LS. The eligibility criteria for inclusion in this review required that the studies evaluated a structured and permanent screening pathway for the identification of LS carriers. The effectiveness of the pathways was analyzed in terms of LS detection rate. RESULTS: We identified five eligible studies. All the LS screening pathways started from CRC cases, of which three followed a universal screening approach. Concerning the laboratory procedures, the pathways used immunohistochemistry and/or microsatellite instability testing. If the responses of the tests indicated a risk for LS, the genetic counseling, performed by a geneticist or a genetic counselor, was mandatory to undergo DNA genetic testing. The overall LS detection rate ranged from 0 to 5.2%. CONCLUSION: This systematic review reported different existing pathways for the identification of LS patients. Although current clinical guidelines suggest to test all the CRC cases to identify LS cases, the actual implementation of pathways for LS identification has not been realized. Large-scale screening programs for LS have the potential to reduce morbidity and mortality for CRC, but coordinated efforts in educating all key stakeholders and addressing public needs are still required. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5600943 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56009432017-09-27 A Systematic Review on the Existing Screening Pathways for Lynch Syndrome Identification Tognetto, Alessia Michelazzo, Maria Benedetta Calabró, Giovanna Elisa Unim, Brigid Di Marco, Marco Ricciardi, Walter Pastorino, Roberta Boccia, Stefania Front Public Health Public Health BACKGROUND: Lynch syndrome (LS) is the most common hereditary colon cancer syndrome, accounting for 3–5% of colorectal cancer (CRC) cases, and it is associated with the development of other cancers. Early detection of individuals with LS is relevant, since they can take advantage of life-saving intensive care surveillance. The debate regarding the best screening policy, however, is far from being concluded. This prompted us to conduct a systematic review of the existing screening pathways for LS. METHODS: We performed a systematic search of MEDLINE, ISI Web of Science, and SCOPUS online databases for the existing screening pathways for LS. The eligibility criteria for inclusion in this review required that the studies evaluated a structured and permanent screening pathway for the identification of LS carriers. The effectiveness of the pathways was analyzed in terms of LS detection rate. RESULTS: We identified five eligible studies. All the LS screening pathways started from CRC cases, of which three followed a universal screening approach. Concerning the laboratory procedures, the pathways used immunohistochemistry and/or microsatellite instability testing. If the responses of the tests indicated a risk for LS, the genetic counseling, performed by a geneticist or a genetic counselor, was mandatory to undergo DNA genetic testing. The overall LS detection rate ranged from 0 to 5.2%. CONCLUSION: This systematic review reported different existing pathways for the identification of LS patients. Although current clinical guidelines suggest to test all the CRC cases to identify LS cases, the actual implementation of pathways for LS identification has not been realized. Large-scale screening programs for LS have the potential to reduce morbidity and mortality for CRC, but coordinated efforts in educating all key stakeholders and addressing public needs are still required. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-09-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5600943/ /pubmed/28955708 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2017.00243 Text en Copyright © 2017 Tognetto, Michelazzo, Calabró, Unim, Di Marco, Ricciardi, Pastorino and Boccia. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Public Health Tognetto, Alessia Michelazzo, Maria Benedetta Calabró, Giovanna Elisa Unim, Brigid Di Marco, Marco Ricciardi, Walter Pastorino, Roberta Boccia, Stefania A Systematic Review on the Existing Screening Pathways for Lynch Syndrome Identification |
title | A Systematic Review on the Existing Screening Pathways for Lynch Syndrome Identification |
title_full | A Systematic Review on the Existing Screening Pathways for Lynch Syndrome Identification |
title_fullStr | A Systematic Review on the Existing Screening Pathways for Lynch Syndrome Identification |
title_full_unstemmed | A Systematic Review on the Existing Screening Pathways for Lynch Syndrome Identification |
title_short | A Systematic Review on the Existing Screening Pathways for Lynch Syndrome Identification |
title_sort | systematic review on the existing screening pathways for lynch syndrome identification |
topic | Public Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5600943/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28955708 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2017.00243 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tognettoalessia asystematicreviewontheexistingscreeningpathwaysforlynchsyndromeidentification AT michelazzomariabenedetta asystematicreviewontheexistingscreeningpathwaysforlynchsyndromeidentification AT calabrogiovannaelisa asystematicreviewontheexistingscreeningpathwaysforlynchsyndromeidentification AT unimbrigid asystematicreviewontheexistingscreeningpathwaysforlynchsyndromeidentification AT dimarcomarco asystematicreviewontheexistingscreeningpathwaysforlynchsyndromeidentification AT ricciardiwalter asystematicreviewontheexistingscreeningpathwaysforlynchsyndromeidentification AT pastorinoroberta asystematicreviewontheexistingscreeningpathwaysforlynchsyndromeidentification AT bocciastefania asystematicreviewontheexistingscreeningpathwaysforlynchsyndromeidentification AT tognettoalessia systematicreviewontheexistingscreeningpathwaysforlynchsyndromeidentification AT michelazzomariabenedetta systematicreviewontheexistingscreeningpathwaysforlynchsyndromeidentification AT calabrogiovannaelisa systematicreviewontheexistingscreeningpathwaysforlynchsyndromeidentification AT unimbrigid systematicreviewontheexistingscreeningpathwaysforlynchsyndromeidentification AT dimarcomarco systematicreviewontheexistingscreeningpathwaysforlynchsyndromeidentification AT ricciardiwalter systematicreviewontheexistingscreeningpathwaysforlynchsyndromeidentification AT pastorinoroberta systematicreviewontheexistingscreeningpathwaysforlynchsyndromeidentification AT bocciastefania systematicreviewontheexistingscreeningpathwaysforlynchsyndromeidentification |