Cargando…

A Systematic Review on the Existing Screening Pathways for Lynch Syndrome Identification

BACKGROUND: Lynch syndrome (LS) is the most common hereditary colon cancer syndrome, accounting for 3–5% of colorectal cancer (CRC) cases, and it is associated with the development of other cancers. Early detection of individuals with LS is relevant, since they can take advantage of life-saving inte...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tognetto, Alessia, Michelazzo, Maria Benedetta, Calabró, Giovanna Elisa, Unim, Brigid, Di Marco, Marco, Ricciardi, Walter, Pastorino, Roberta, Boccia, Stefania
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5600943/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28955708
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2017.00243
_version_ 1783264298218291200
author Tognetto, Alessia
Michelazzo, Maria Benedetta
Calabró, Giovanna Elisa
Unim, Brigid
Di Marco, Marco
Ricciardi, Walter
Pastorino, Roberta
Boccia, Stefania
author_facet Tognetto, Alessia
Michelazzo, Maria Benedetta
Calabró, Giovanna Elisa
Unim, Brigid
Di Marco, Marco
Ricciardi, Walter
Pastorino, Roberta
Boccia, Stefania
author_sort Tognetto, Alessia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Lynch syndrome (LS) is the most common hereditary colon cancer syndrome, accounting for 3–5% of colorectal cancer (CRC) cases, and it is associated with the development of other cancers. Early detection of individuals with LS is relevant, since they can take advantage of life-saving intensive care surveillance. The debate regarding the best screening policy, however, is far from being concluded. This prompted us to conduct a systematic review of the existing screening pathways for LS. METHODS: We performed a systematic search of MEDLINE, ISI Web of Science, and SCOPUS online databases for the existing screening pathways for LS. The eligibility criteria for inclusion in this review required that the studies evaluated a structured and permanent screening pathway for the identification of LS carriers. The effectiveness of the pathways was analyzed in terms of LS detection rate. RESULTS: We identified five eligible studies. All the LS screening pathways started from CRC cases, of which three followed a universal screening approach. Concerning the laboratory procedures, the pathways used immunohistochemistry and/or microsatellite instability testing. If the responses of the tests indicated a risk for LS, the genetic counseling, performed by a geneticist or a genetic counselor, was mandatory to undergo DNA genetic testing. The overall LS detection rate ranged from 0 to 5.2%. CONCLUSION: This systematic review reported different existing pathways for the identification of LS patients. Although current clinical guidelines suggest to test all the CRC cases to identify LS cases, the actual implementation of pathways for LS identification has not been realized. Large-scale screening programs for LS have the potential to reduce morbidity and mortality for CRC, but coordinated efforts in educating all key stakeholders and addressing public needs are still required.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5600943
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56009432017-09-27 A Systematic Review on the Existing Screening Pathways for Lynch Syndrome Identification Tognetto, Alessia Michelazzo, Maria Benedetta Calabró, Giovanna Elisa Unim, Brigid Di Marco, Marco Ricciardi, Walter Pastorino, Roberta Boccia, Stefania Front Public Health Public Health BACKGROUND: Lynch syndrome (LS) is the most common hereditary colon cancer syndrome, accounting for 3–5% of colorectal cancer (CRC) cases, and it is associated with the development of other cancers. Early detection of individuals with LS is relevant, since they can take advantage of life-saving intensive care surveillance. The debate regarding the best screening policy, however, is far from being concluded. This prompted us to conduct a systematic review of the existing screening pathways for LS. METHODS: We performed a systematic search of MEDLINE, ISI Web of Science, and SCOPUS online databases for the existing screening pathways for LS. The eligibility criteria for inclusion in this review required that the studies evaluated a structured and permanent screening pathway for the identification of LS carriers. The effectiveness of the pathways was analyzed in terms of LS detection rate. RESULTS: We identified five eligible studies. All the LS screening pathways started from CRC cases, of which three followed a universal screening approach. Concerning the laboratory procedures, the pathways used immunohistochemistry and/or microsatellite instability testing. If the responses of the tests indicated a risk for LS, the genetic counseling, performed by a geneticist or a genetic counselor, was mandatory to undergo DNA genetic testing. The overall LS detection rate ranged from 0 to 5.2%. CONCLUSION: This systematic review reported different existing pathways for the identification of LS patients. Although current clinical guidelines suggest to test all the CRC cases to identify LS cases, the actual implementation of pathways for LS identification has not been realized. Large-scale screening programs for LS have the potential to reduce morbidity and mortality for CRC, but coordinated efforts in educating all key stakeholders and addressing public needs are still required. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-09-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5600943/ /pubmed/28955708 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2017.00243 Text en Copyright © 2017 Tognetto, Michelazzo, Calabró, Unim, Di Marco, Ricciardi, Pastorino and Boccia. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Public Health
Tognetto, Alessia
Michelazzo, Maria Benedetta
Calabró, Giovanna Elisa
Unim, Brigid
Di Marco, Marco
Ricciardi, Walter
Pastorino, Roberta
Boccia, Stefania
A Systematic Review on the Existing Screening Pathways for Lynch Syndrome Identification
title A Systematic Review on the Existing Screening Pathways for Lynch Syndrome Identification
title_full A Systematic Review on the Existing Screening Pathways for Lynch Syndrome Identification
title_fullStr A Systematic Review on the Existing Screening Pathways for Lynch Syndrome Identification
title_full_unstemmed A Systematic Review on the Existing Screening Pathways for Lynch Syndrome Identification
title_short A Systematic Review on the Existing Screening Pathways for Lynch Syndrome Identification
title_sort systematic review on the existing screening pathways for lynch syndrome identification
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5600943/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28955708
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2017.00243
work_keys_str_mv AT tognettoalessia asystematicreviewontheexistingscreeningpathwaysforlynchsyndromeidentification
AT michelazzomariabenedetta asystematicreviewontheexistingscreeningpathwaysforlynchsyndromeidentification
AT calabrogiovannaelisa asystematicreviewontheexistingscreeningpathwaysforlynchsyndromeidentification
AT unimbrigid asystematicreviewontheexistingscreeningpathwaysforlynchsyndromeidentification
AT dimarcomarco asystematicreviewontheexistingscreeningpathwaysforlynchsyndromeidentification
AT ricciardiwalter asystematicreviewontheexistingscreeningpathwaysforlynchsyndromeidentification
AT pastorinoroberta asystematicreviewontheexistingscreeningpathwaysforlynchsyndromeidentification
AT bocciastefania asystematicreviewontheexistingscreeningpathwaysforlynchsyndromeidentification
AT tognettoalessia systematicreviewontheexistingscreeningpathwaysforlynchsyndromeidentification
AT michelazzomariabenedetta systematicreviewontheexistingscreeningpathwaysforlynchsyndromeidentification
AT calabrogiovannaelisa systematicreviewontheexistingscreeningpathwaysforlynchsyndromeidentification
AT unimbrigid systematicreviewontheexistingscreeningpathwaysforlynchsyndromeidentification
AT dimarcomarco systematicreviewontheexistingscreeningpathwaysforlynchsyndromeidentification
AT ricciardiwalter systematicreviewontheexistingscreeningpathwaysforlynchsyndromeidentification
AT pastorinoroberta systematicreviewontheexistingscreeningpathwaysforlynchsyndromeidentification
AT bocciastefania systematicreviewontheexistingscreeningpathwaysforlynchsyndromeidentification