Cargando…

Oral lymphoepithelial cyst: A clinicopathological study of 26 cases and review of the literature

INTRODUCTION: Τo describe the clinicopathological features of 26 oral lymphoepithelial cysts (LECs) and review the literature. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty-six cases of oral LECs diagnosed during a 37-year period were retrospectively collected. The patients’ gender and age, as well as the main clini...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sykara, Maria, Ntovas, Panagiotis, Kalogirou, Eleni-Marina, Tosios, Konstantinos I., Sklavounou, Alexandra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medicina Oral S.L. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5601105/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28936296
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.54072
_version_ 1783264326557106176
author Sykara, Maria
Ntovas, Panagiotis
Kalogirou, Eleni-Marina
Tosios, Konstantinos I.
Sklavounou, Alexandra
author_facet Sykara, Maria
Ntovas, Panagiotis
Kalogirou, Eleni-Marina
Tosios, Konstantinos I.
Sklavounou, Alexandra
author_sort Sykara, Maria
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Τo describe the clinicopathological features of 26 oral lymphoepithelial cysts (LECs) and review the literature. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty-six cases of oral LECs diagnosed during a 37-year period were retrospectively collected. The patients’ gender and age, as well as the main clinical features of the cysts were retrieved from the requisition forms. The main microscopic features were recorded after reevaluation of all cases. Pubmed and Google Scholar electronic databases were searched with the key word “oral LEC”. Inclusion criteria were the microscopic confirmation of LEC diagnosis and the report at least two of three main clinical features (gender, age and cyst’s location). RESULTS: The 26 oral LECs represented 0.08% of 31,564 biopsies accessioned during the study period. They affected 25 patients, 14 females and 11 males with a mean age of 33.04±9.81 years. They appeared as smooth (92%) nodules, with soft (24%) or firm (76%) consistency and normal (28%), yellow to normal (20%), yellow (32%) or white (20%) hue, in the tongue (69.23%) or the floor of mouth (30.77%). They were covered by parakeratinized squamous (92.31%) or non-keratinized (7.69%) epithelium and contained desquamated epithelial cells, amorphous eosinophilic material and/or inflammatory cells (100%). The lymphoid tissue surrounded the cystic cavity partially (34.62%) or completely (65.38%), often in a follicular pattern with prominent germinal centers (53.85%). Literature review yielded 316 cases of oral LECs derived from 25 case reports, 3 case studies/retrospective studies with detailed information for each case and 7 studies with summarized data. CONCLUSIONS: Oral LEC is a pathologic entity with discrete clinical presentation that is, however, commonly misdiagnosed in clinical practice as other, mostly benign, entities. Its pathogenesis remains obscure, as its clinicopathologic features are consistent with both theories suggested up to date. Key words:Oral lymphoepithelial cyst; developmental cyst; non odontogenic cyst; lymphoid tissue; oral tonsil.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5601105
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Medicina Oral S.L.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56011052017-09-21 Oral lymphoepithelial cyst: A clinicopathological study of 26 cases and review of the literature Sykara, Maria Ntovas, Panagiotis Kalogirou, Eleni-Marina Tosios, Konstantinos I. Sklavounou, Alexandra J Clin Exp Dent Review INTRODUCTION: Τo describe the clinicopathological features of 26 oral lymphoepithelial cysts (LECs) and review the literature. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty-six cases of oral LECs diagnosed during a 37-year period were retrospectively collected. The patients’ gender and age, as well as the main clinical features of the cysts were retrieved from the requisition forms. The main microscopic features were recorded after reevaluation of all cases. Pubmed and Google Scholar electronic databases were searched with the key word “oral LEC”. Inclusion criteria were the microscopic confirmation of LEC diagnosis and the report at least two of three main clinical features (gender, age and cyst’s location). RESULTS: The 26 oral LECs represented 0.08% of 31,564 biopsies accessioned during the study period. They affected 25 patients, 14 females and 11 males with a mean age of 33.04±9.81 years. They appeared as smooth (92%) nodules, with soft (24%) or firm (76%) consistency and normal (28%), yellow to normal (20%), yellow (32%) or white (20%) hue, in the tongue (69.23%) or the floor of mouth (30.77%). They were covered by parakeratinized squamous (92.31%) or non-keratinized (7.69%) epithelium and contained desquamated epithelial cells, amorphous eosinophilic material and/or inflammatory cells (100%). The lymphoid tissue surrounded the cystic cavity partially (34.62%) or completely (65.38%), often in a follicular pattern with prominent germinal centers (53.85%). Literature review yielded 316 cases of oral LECs derived from 25 case reports, 3 case studies/retrospective studies with detailed information for each case and 7 studies with summarized data. CONCLUSIONS: Oral LEC is a pathologic entity with discrete clinical presentation that is, however, commonly misdiagnosed in clinical practice as other, mostly benign, entities. Its pathogenesis remains obscure, as its clinicopathologic features are consistent with both theories suggested up to date. Key words:Oral lymphoepithelial cyst; developmental cyst; non odontogenic cyst; lymphoid tissue; oral tonsil. Medicina Oral S.L. 2017-08-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5601105/ /pubmed/28936296 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.54072 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Medicina Oral S.L. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Sykara, Maria
Ntovas, Panagiotis
Kalogirou, Eleni-Marina
Tosios, Konstantinos I.
Sklavounou, Alexandra
Oral lymphoepithelial cyst: A clinicopathological study of 26 cases and review of the literature
title Oral lymphoepithelial cyst: A clinicopathological study of 26 cases and review of the literature
title_full Oral lymphoepithelial cyst: A clinicopathological study of 26 cases and review of the literature
title_fullStr Oral lymphoepithelial cyst: A clinicopathological study of 26 cases and review of the literature
title_full_unstemmed Oral lymphoepithelial cyst: A clinicopathological study of 26 cases and review of the literature
title_short Oral lymphoepithelial cyst: A clinicopathological study of 26 cases and review of the literature
title_sort oral lymphoepithelial cyst: a clinicopathological study of 26 cases and review of the literature
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5601105/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28936296
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.54072
work_keys_str_mv AT sykaramaria orallymphoepithelialcystaclinicopathologicalstudyof26casesandreviewoftheliterature
AT ntovaspanagiotis orallymphoepithelialcystaclinicopathologicalstudyof26casesandreviewoftheliterature
AT kalogirouelenimarina orallymphoepithelialcystaclinicopathologicalstudyof26casesandreviewoftheliterature
AT tosioskonstantinosi orallymphoepithelialcystaclinicopathologicalstudyof26casesandreviewoftheliterature
AT sklavounoualexandra orallymphoepithelialcystaclinicopathologicalstudyof26casesandreviewoftheliterature