Cargando…

Guided bone regeneration: materials and biological mechanisms revisited

Guided bone regeneration (GBR) is commonly used in combination with the installment of titanium implants. The application of a membrane to exclude non‐osteogenic tissues from interfering with bone regeneration is a key principle of GBR. Membrane materials possess a number of properties which are ame...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Elgali, Ibrahim, Omar, Omar, Dahlin, Christer, Thomsen, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5601292/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28833567
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eos.12364
_version_ 1783264368834641920
author Elgali, Ibrahim
Omar, Omar
Dahlin, Christer
Thomsen, Peter
author_facet Elgali, Ibrahim
Omar, Omar
Dahlin, Christer
Thomsen, Peter
author_sort Elgali, Ibrahim
collection PubMed
description Guided bone regeneration (GBR) is commonly used in combination with the installment of titanium implants. The application of a membrane to exclude non‐osteogenic tissues from interfering with bone regeneration is a key principle of GBR. Membrane materials possess a number of properties which are amenable to modification. A large number of membranes have been introduced for experimental and clinical verification. This prompts the need for an update on membrane properties and the biological outcomes, as well as a critical assessment of the biological mechanisms governing bone regeneration in defects covered by membranes. The relevant literature for this narrative review was assessed after a MEDLINE/PubMed database search. Experimental data suggest that different modifications of the physicochemical and mechanical properties of membranes may promote bone regeneration. Nevertheless, the precise role of membrane porosities for the barrier function of GBR membranes still awaits elucidation. Novel experimental findings also suggest an active role of the membrane compartment per se in promoting the regenerative processes in the underlying defect during GBR, instead of being purely a passive barrier. The optimization of membrane materials by systematically addressing both the barrier and the bioactive properties is an important strategy in this field of research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5601292
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56012922017-10-03 Guided bone regeneration: materials and biological mechanisms revisited Elgali, Ibrahim Omar, Omar Dahlin, Christer Thomsen, Peter Eur J Oral Sci Review Article Guided bone regeneration (GBR) is commonly used in combination with the installment of titanium implants. The application of a membrane to exclude non‐osteogenic tissues from interfering with bone regeneration is a key principle of GBR. Membrane materials possess a number of properties which are amenable to modification. A large number of membranes have been introduced for experimental and clinical verification. This prompts the need for an update on membrane properties and the biological outcomes, as well as a critical assessment of the biological mechanisms governing bone regeneration in defects covered by membranes. The relevant literature for this narrative review was assessed after a MEDLINE/PubMed database search. Experimental data suggest that different modifications of the physicochemical and mechanical properties of membranes may promote bone regeneration. Nevertheless, the precise role of membrane porosities for the barrier function of GBR membranes still awaits elucidation. Novel experimental findings also suggest an active role of the membrane compartment per se in promoting the regenerative processes in the underlying defect during GBR, instead of being purely a passive barrier. The optimization of membrane materials by systematically addressing both the barrier and the bioactive properties is an important strategy in this field of research. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-08-19 2017-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5601292/ /pubmed/28833567 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eos.12364 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Eur J Oral Sci published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Review Article
Elgali, Ibrahim
Omar, Omar
Dahlin, Christer
Thomsen, Peter
Guided bone regeneration: materials and biological mechanisms revisited
title Guided bone regeneration: materials and biological mechanisms revisited
title_full Guided bone regeneration: materials and biological mechanisms revisited
title_fullStr Guided bone regeneration: materials and biological mechanisms revisited
title_full_unstemmed Guided bone regeneration: materials and biological mechanisms revisited
title_short Guided bone regeneration: materials and biological mechanisms revisited
title_sort guided bone regeneration: materials and biological mechanisms revisited
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5601292/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28833567
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eos.12364
work_keys_str_mv AT elgaliibrahim guidedboneregenerationmaterialsandbiologicalmechanismsrevisited
AT omaromar guidedboneregenerationmaterialsandbiologicalmechanismsrevisited
AT dahlinchrister guidedboneregenerationmaterialsandbiologicalmechanismsrevisited
AT thomsenpeter guidedboneregenerationmaterialsandbiologicalmechanismsrevisited