Cargando…
Guided bone regeneration: materials and biological mechanisms revisited
Guided bone regeneration (GBR) is commonly used in combination with the installment of titanium implants. The application of a membrane to exclude non‐osteogenic tissues from interfering with bone regeneration is a key principle of GBR. Membrane materials possess a number of properties which are ame...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5601292/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28833567 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eos.12364 |
_version_ | 1783264368834641920 |
---|---|
author | Elgali, Ibrahim Omar, Omar Dahlin, Christer Thomsen, Peter |
author_facet | Elgali, Ibrahim Omar, Omar Dahlin, Christer Thomsen, Peter |
author_sort | Elgali, Ibrahim |
collection | PubMed |
description | Guided bone regeneration (GBR) is commonly used in combination with the installment of titanium implants. The application of a membrane to exclude non‐osteogenic tissues from interfering with bone regeneration is a key principle of GBR. Membrane materials possess a number of properties which are amenable to modification. A large number of membranes have been introduced for experimental and clinical verification. This prompts the need for an update on membrane properties and the biological outcomes, as well as a critical assessment of the biological mechanisms governing bone regeneration in defects covered by membranes. The relevant literature for this narrative review was assessed after a MEDLINE/PubMed database search. Experimental data suggest that different modifications of the physicochemical and mechanical properties of membranes may promote bone regeneration. Nevertheless, the precise role of membrane porosities for the barrier function of GBR membranes still awaits elucidation. Novel experimental findings also suggest an active role of the membrane compartment per se in promoting the regenerative processes in the underlying defect during GBR, instead of being purely a passive barrier. The optimization of membrane materials by systematically addressing both the barrier and the bioactive properties is an important strategy in this field of research. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5601292 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56012922017-10-03 Guided bone regeneration: materials and biological mechanisms revisited Elgali, Ibrahim Omar, Omar Dahlin, Christer Thomsen, Peter Eur J Oral Sci Review Article Guided bone regeneration (GBR) is commonly used in combination with the installment of titanium implants. The application of a membrane to exclude non‐osteogenic tissues from interfering with bone regeneration is a key principle of GBR. Membrane materials possess a number of properties which are amenable to modification. A large number of membranes have been introduced for experimental and clinical verification. This prompts the need for an update on membrane properties and the biological outcomes, as well as a critical assessment of the biological mechanisms governing bone regeneration in defects covered by membranes. The relevant literature for this narrative review was assessed after a MEDLINE/PubMed database search. Experimental data suggest that different modifications of the physicochemical and mechanical properties of membranes may promote bone regeneration. Nevertheless, the precise role of membrane porosities for the barrier function of GBR membranes still awaits elucidation. Novel experimental findings also suggest an active role of the membrane compartment per se in promoting the regenerative processes in the underlying defect during GBR, instead of being purely a passive barrier. The optimization of membrane materials by systematically addressing both the barrier and the bioactive properties is an important strategy in this field of research. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-08-19 2017-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5601292/ /pubmed/28833567 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eos.12364 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Eur J Oral Sci published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Elgali, Ibrahim Omar, Omar Dahlin, Christer Thomsen, Peter Guided bone regeneration: materials and biological mechanisms revisited |
title | Guided bone regeneration: materials and biological mechanisms revisited |
title_full | Guided bone regeneration: materials and biological mechanisms revisited |
title_fullStr | Guided bone regeneration: materials and biological mechanisms revisited |
title_full_unstemmed | Guided bone regeneration: materials and biological mechanisms revisited |
title_short | Guided bone regeneration: materials and biological mechanisms revisited |
title_sort | guided bone regeneration: materials and biological mechanisms revisited |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5601292/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28833567 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eos.12364 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT elgaliibrahim guidedboneregenerationmaterialsandbiologicalmechanismsrevisited AT omaromar guidedboneregenerationmaterialsandbiologicalmechanismsrevisited AT dahlinchrister guidedboneregenerationmaterialsandbiologicalmechanismsrevisited AT thomsenpeter guidedboneregenerationmaterialsandbiologicalmechanismsrevisited |