Cargando…

Comparison of fractionation proteomics for local SWATH library building

For data‐independent acquisition by means of sequential window acquisition of all theoretical fragment ion spectra (SWATH), a reference library of data‐dependent acquisition (DDA) runs is typically used to correlate the quantitative data from the fragment ion spectra with peptide identifications. Th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Govaert, Elisabeth, Van Steendam, Katleen, Willems, Sander, Vossaert, Liesbeth, Dhaenens, Maarten, Deforce, Dieter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5601298/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28664598
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pmic.201700052
_version_ 1783264370257559552
author Govaert, Elisabeth
Van Steendam, Katleen
Willems, Sander
Vossaert, Liesbeth
Dhaenens, Maarten
Deforce, Dieter
author_facet Govaert, Elisabeth
Van Steendam, Katleen
Willems, Sander
Vossaert, Liesbeth
Dhaenens, Maarten
Deforce, Dieter
author_sort Govaert, Elisabeth
collection PubMed
description For data‐independent acquisition by means of sequential window acquisition of all theoretical fragment ion spectra (SWATH), a reference library of data‐dependent acquisition (DDA) runs is typically used to correlate the quantitative data from the fragment ion spectra with peptide identifications. The quality and coverage of such a reference library is therefore essential when processing SWATH data. In general, library sizes can be increased by reducing the impact of DDA precursor selection with replicate runs or fractionation. However, these strategies can affect the match between the library and SWATH measurement, and thus larger library sizes do not necessarily correspond to improved SWATH quantification. Here, three fractionation strategies to increase local library size were compared to standard library building using replicate DDA injection: protein SDS‐PAGE fractionation, peptide high‐pH RP‐HPLC fractionation and MS‐acquisition gas phase fractionation. The impact of these libraries on SWATH performance was evaluated in terms of the number of extracted peptides and proteins, the match quality of the peptides and the extraction reproducibility of the transitions. These analyses were conducted using the hydrophilic proteome of differentiating human embryonic stem cells. Our results show that SWATH quantitative results and interpretations are affected by choice of fractionation technique. Data are available via ProteomeXchange with identifier PXD006190.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5601298
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56012982017-10-03 Comparison of fractionation proteomics for local SWATH library building Govaert, Elisabeth Van Steendam, Katleen Willems, Sander Vossaert, Liesbeth Dhaenens, Maarten Deforce, Dieter Proteomics Bioinformatics For data‐independent acquisition by means of sequential window acquisition of all theoretical fragment ion spectra (SWATH), a reference library of data‐dependent acquisition (DDA) runs is typically used to correlate the quantitative data from the fragment ion spectra with peptide identifications. The quality and coverage of such a reference library is therefore essential when processing SWATH data. In general, library sizes can be increased by reducing the impact of DDA precursor selection with replicate runs or fractionation. However, these strategies can affect the match between the library and SWATH measurement, and thus larger library sizes do not necessarily correspond to improved SWATH quantification. Here, three fractionation strategies to increase local library size were compared to standard library building using replicate DDA injection: protein SDS‐PAGE fractionation, peptide high‐pH RP‐HPLC fractionation and MS‐acquisition gas phase fractionation. The impact of these libraries on SWATH performance was evaluated in terms of the number of extracted peptides and proteins, the match quality of the peptides and the extraction reproducibility of the transitions. These analyses were conducted using the hydrophilic proteome of differentiating human embryonic stem cells. Our results show that SWATH quantitative results and interpretations are affected by choice of fractionation technique. Data are available via ProteomeXchange with identifier PXD006190. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-08-22 2017-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5601298/ /pubmed/28664598 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pmic.201700052 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Proteomics Published by Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co.KGaA, Weinheim. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Bioinformatics
Govaert, Elisabeth
Van Steendam, Katleen
Willems, Sander
Vossaert, Liesbeth
Dhaenens, Maarten
Deforce, Dieter
Comparison of fractionation proteomics for local SWATH library building
title Comparison of fractionation proteomics for local SWATH library building
title_full Comparison of fractionation proteomics for local SWATH library building
title_fullStr Comparison of fractionation proteomics for local SWATH library building
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of fractionation proteomics for local SWATH library building
title_short Comparison of fractionation proteomics for local SWATH library building
title_sort comparison of fractionation proteomics for local swath library building
topic Bioinformatics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5601298/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28664598
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pmic.201700052
work_keys_str_mv AT govaertelisabeth comparisonoffractionationproteomicsforlocalswathlibrarybuilding
AT vansteendamkatleen comparisonoffractionationproteomicsforlocalswathlibrarybuilding
AT willemssander comparisonoffractionationproteomicsforlocalswathlibrarybuilding
AT vossaertliesbeth comparisonoffractionationproteomicsforlocalswathlibrarybuilding
AT dhaenensmaarten comparisonoffractionationproteomicsforlocalswathlibrarybuilding
AT deforcedieter comparisonoffractionationproteomicsforlocalswathlibrarybuilding