Cargando…
Systematic analysis on the efficacy of bone enhancement methods used for success in dental implants
Bone grafting is beneficial in enhancing bones that are lost due to trauma or natural or pathologic process. Autogenous bone, allogenic bone, xenogeneic bone, bone substitutes, and alloplasts can also be used for this purpose. Bone quantity should be adequate for the placement of implants, which nec...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5601489/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28936034 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jips.jips_19_17 |
_version_ | 1783264395176968192 |
---|---|
author | Elakkiya, S. Ramesh, A. S. Prabhu, K. |
author_facet | Elakkiya, S. Ramesh, A. S. Prabhu, K. |
author_sort | Elakkiya, S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Bone grafting is beneficial in enhancing bones that are lost due to trauma or natural or pathologic process. Autogenous bone, allogenic bone, xenogeneic bone, bone substitutes, and alloplasts can also be used for this purpose. Bone quantity should be adequate for the placement of implants, which necessitate the use of bone grafts before implant placement. OBJECTIVE: This review analyses the different bone graft materials that are used for grafting around implants and evaluate if these grafts yield successful implant osseointegration over a period of time. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The MEDLINE–PubMed database was searched from September 2016 to 10 years previously. Several journals were hand searched and from cross-references. The primary outcome measure that was analyzed was the survival rate of dental implants in the grafted sites at 6 months–1 year, and the secondary outcomes were success rates of dental implants over a period of 3–5 years’ follow-up. RESULTS: The search yielded 213 articles. Ultimately, 31 studies meeting the eligibility criteria were selected. The analysis shows that autologous bone grafts can be preferred over allografts and xenografts for grafting implant sites, which showed less complication and high success rate. CONCLUSION: Based on the available data in the current existing studies with a follow-up period of at least 3–5 years, it can be summarized that the autologous bone grafts can be preferred over allografts and xenografts for grafting implant sites since they are stable for at least 3–5 years. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5601489 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56014892018-07-01 Systematic analysis on the efficacy of bone enhancement methods used for success in dental implants Elakkiya, S. Ramesh, A. S. Prabhu, K. J Indian Prosthodont Soc Review Article Bone grafting is beneficial in enhancing bones that are lost due to trauma or natural or pathologic process. Autogenous bone, allogenic bone, xenogeneic bone, bone substitutes, and alloplasts can also be used for this purpose. Bone quantity should be adequate for the placement of implants, which necessitate the use of bone grafts before implant placement. OBJECTIVE: This review analyses the different bone graft materials that are used for grafting around implants and evaluate if these grafts yield successful implant osseointegration over a period of time. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The MEDLINE–PubMed database was searched from September 2016 to 10 years previously. Several journals were hand searched and from cross-references. The primary outcome measure that was analyzed was the survival rate of dental implants in the grafted sites at 6 months–1 year, and the secondary outcomes were success rates of dental implants over a period of 3–5 years’ follow-up. RESULTS: The search yielded 213 articles. Ultimately, 31 studies meeting the eligibility criteria were selected. The analysis shows that autologous bone grafts can be preferred over allografts and xenografts for grafting implant sites, which showed less complication and high success rate. CONCLUSION: Based on the available data in the current existing studies with a follow-up period of at least 3–5 years, it can be summarized that the autologous bone grafts can be preferred over allografts and xenografts for grafting implant sites since they are stable for at least 3–5 years. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5601489/ /pubmed/28936034 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jips.jips_19_17 Text en Copyright: © 2017 The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Elakkiya, S. Ramesh, A. S. Prabhu, K. Systematic analysis on the efficacy of bone enhancement methods used for success in dental implants |
title | Systematic analysis on the efficacy of bone enhancement methods used for success in dental implants |
title_full | Systematic analysis on the efficacy of bone enhancement methods used for success in dental implants |
title_fullStr | Systematic analysis on the efficacy of bone enhancement methods used for success in dental implants |
title_full_unstemmed | Systematic analysis on the efficacy of bone enhancement methods used for success in dental implants |
title_short | Systematic analysis on the efficacy of bone enhancement methods used for success in dental implants |
title_sort | systematic analysis on the efficacy of bone enhancement methods used for success in dental implants |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5601489/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28936034 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jips.jips_19_17 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT elakkiyas systematicanalysisontheefficacyofboneenhancementmethodsusedforsuccessindentalimplants AT rameshas systematicanalysisontheefficacyofboneenhancementmethodsusedforsuccessindentalimplants AT prabhuk systematicanalysisontheefficacyofboneenhancementmethodsusedforsuccessindentalimplants |