Cargando…

Volumetry of the dominant intraprostatic tumour lesion: intersequence and interobserver differences on multiparametric MRI

OBJECTIVE: To establish the interobserver reproducibility of tumour volumetry on individual multiparametric (mp) prostate MRI sequences, validate measurements with histology and determine whether functional to morphological volume ratios reflect Gleason score. METHODS: 41 males with prostate cancer...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Harvey, Hugh, Orton, Matthew R, Morgan, Veronica A, Parker, Chris, Dearnaley, David, Fisher, Cyril, deSouza, Nandita M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The British Institute of Radiology. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5601508/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28055249
http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20160416
_version_ 1783264398574354432
author Harvey, Hugh
Orton, Matthew R
Morgan, Veronica A
Parker, Chris
Dearnaley, David
Fisher, Cyril
deSouza, Nandita M
author_facet Harvey, Hugh
Orton, Matthew R
Morgan, Veronica A
Parker, Chris
Dearnaley, David
Fisher, Cyril
deSouza, Nandita M
author_sort Harvey, Hugh
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To establish the interobserver reproducibility of tumour volumetry on individual multiparametric (mp) prostate MRI sequences, validate measurements with histology and determine whether functional to morphological volume ratios reflect Gleason score. METHODS: 41 males with prostate cancer treated with prostatectomy (Cohort 1) or radical radiotherapy (Cohort 2), who had pre-treatment mpMRI [T(2) weighted (T2W) MRI, diffusion-weighted (DW)-MRI and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MRI], were studied retrospectively. Dominant intraprostatic lesions (DIPLs) were manually delineated on each sequence and volumes were compared between observers (n = 40 analyzable) and with radical prostatectomy (n = 20). Volume ratios of DW-MRI and DCE-MRI to T2W MRI were documented and compared between Gleason grade 3 + 3, 3 + 4 and 4 + 3 or greater categories. RESULTS: Limits of agreement of DIPL volumes between observers were: T2W MRI 0.9, −1.1 cm(3), DW-MRI 1.3, −1.7 cm(3) and DCE-MRI 0.74, −0.89 cm(3). In Cohort 1, T2W volumes overestimated fixed specimen histological volumes (+33% Observer 1, +16% Observer 2); DW- and DCE-MRI underestimated histological volume, the latter markedly so (−32% Observer 1, −79% Observer 2). Differences between T2W, DW- and DCE-MRI volumes were significant (p < 10(−8)). The ratio of DW-MRI volume (73.9 ± 18.1% Observer 1, 72.5 ± 21.9% Observer 2) and DCE-MRI volume (42.6 ± 24.6% Observer 1, 34.3 ± 24.9% Observer 2) to T2W volume was significantly different (p < 10(−8)), but these volume ratios did not differ between the Gleason grades. CONCLUSION: The low variability of the DIPL volume on T2W MRI between Observers and agreement with histology indicates its suitability for delineation of gross tumour volume for radiotherapy planning. The volume of cellular tumour represented by DW-MRI is greater than the vascular (DCE) abnormality; ratios of both to T2W volume are independent of Gleason score. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: (1) Manual volume measurement of tumour is reproducible within 1 cm(3) between observers on all sequences, confirming suitability across observers for radiotherapy planning. (2) Volumes derived on T2W MRI most accurately represent in vivo lesion volumes. (3) The proportion of cellular (DW-MRI) or vascular (DCE-MRI) volume to morphological (T2W MRI) volume is not affected by Gleason score.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5601508
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher The British Institute of Radiology.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56015082017-09-22 Volumetry of the dominant intraprostatic tumour lesion: intersequence and interobserver differences on multiparametric MRI Harvey, Hugh Orton, Matthew R Morgan, Veronica A Parker, Chris Dearnaley, David Fisher, Cyril deSouza, Nandita M Br J Radiol Full Paper OBJECTIVE: To establish the interobserver reproducibility of tumour volumetry on individual multiparametric (mp) prostate MRI sequences, validate measurements with histology and determine whether functional to morphological volume ratios reflect Gleason score. METHODS: 41 males with prostate cancer treated with prostatectomy (Cohort 1) or radical radiotherapy (Cohort 2), who had pre-treatment mpMRI [T(2) weighted (T2W) MRI, diffusion-weighted (DW)-MRI and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MRI], were studied retrospectively. Dominant intraprostatic lesions (DIPLs) were manually delineated on each sequence and volumes were compared between observers (n = 40 analyzable) and with radical prostatectomy (n = 20). Volume ratios of DW-MRI and DCE-MRI to T2W MRI were documented and compared between Gleason grade 3 + 3, 3 + 4 and 4 + 3 or greater categories. RESULTS: Limits of agreement of DIPL volumes between observers were: T2W MRI 0.9, −1.1 cm(3), DW-MRI 1.3, −1.7 cm(3) and DCE-MRI 0.74, −0.89 cm(3). In Cohort 1, T2W volumes overestimated fixed specimen histological volumes (+33% Observer 1, +16% Observer 2); DW- and DCE-MRI underestimated histological volume, the latter markedly so (−32% Observer 1, −79% Observer 2). Differences between T2W, DW- and DCE-MRI volumes were significant (p < 10(−8)). The ratio of DW-MRI volume (73.9 ± 18.1% Observer 1, 72.5 ± 21.9% Observer 2) and DCE-MRI volume (42.6 ± 24.6% Observer 1, 34.3 ± 24.9% Observer 2) to T2W volume was significantly different (p < 10(−8)), but these volume ratios did not differ between the Gleason grades. CONCLUSION: The low variability of the DIPL volume on T2W MRI between Observers and agreement with histology indicates its suitability for delineation of gross tumour volume for radiotherapy planning. The volume of cellular tumour represented by DW-MRI is greater than the vascular (DCE) abnormality; ratios of both to T2W volume are independent of Gleason score. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: (1) Manual volume measurement of tumour is reproducible within 1 cm(3) between observers on all sequences, confirming suitability across observers for radiotherapy planning. (2) Volumes derived on T2W MRI most accurately represent in vivo lesion volumes. (3) The proportion of cellular (DW-MRI) or vascular (DCE-MRI) volume to morphological (T2W MRI) volume is not affected by Gleason score. The British Institute of Radiology. 2017-03 2017-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5601508/ /pubmed/28055249 http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20160416 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Published by the British Institute of Radiology This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 Unported License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/, which permits unrestricted non-commercial reuse, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Full Paper
Harvey, Hugh
Orton, Matthew R
Morgan, Veronica A
Parker, Chris
Dearnaley, David
Fisher, Cyril
deSouza, Nandita M
Volumetry of the dominant intraprostatic tumour lesion: intersequence and interobserver differences on multiparametric MRI
title Volumetry of the dominant intraprostatic tumour lesion: intersequence and interobserver differences on multiparametric MRI
title_full Volumetry of the dominant intraprostatic tumour lesion: intersequence and interobserver differences on multiparametric MRI
title_fullStr Volumetry of the dominant intraprostatic tumour lesion: intersequence and interobserver differences on multiparametric MRI
title_full_unstemmed Volumetry of the dominant intraprostatic tumour lesion: intersequence and interobserver differences on multiparametric MRI
title_short Volumetry of the dominant intraprostatic tumour lesion: intersequence and interobserver differences on multiparametric MRI
title_sort volumetry of the dominant intraprostatic tumour lesion: intersequence and interobserver differences on multiparametric mri
topic Full Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5601508/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28055249
http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20160416
work_keys_str_mv AT harveyhugh volumetryofthedominantintraprostatictumourlesionintersequenceandinterobserverdifferencesonmultiparametricmri
AT ortonmatthewr volumetryofthedominantintraprostatictumourlesionintersequenceandinterobserverdifferencesonmultiparametricmri
AT morganveronicaa volumetryofthedominantintraprostatictumourlesionintersequenceandinterobserverdifferencesonmultiparametricmri
AT parkerchris volumetryofthedominantintraprostatictumourlesionintersequenceandinterobserverdifferencesonmultiparametricmri
AT dearnaleydavid volumetryofthedominantintraprostatictumourlesionintersequenceandinterobserverdifferencesonmultiparametricmri
AT fishercyril volumetryofthedominantintraprostatictumourlesionintersequenceandinterobserverdifferencesonmultiparametricmri
AT desouzananditam volumetryofthedominantintraprostatictumourlesionintersequenceandinterobserverdifferencesonmultiparametricmri