Cargando…
Biomarker immunoprofile in salivary duct carcinomas: clinicopathological and prognostic implications with evaluation of the revised classification
Salivary duct carcinoma (SDC) is an uncommon, aggressive malignant neoplasm histologically resembling high-grade mammary ductal carcinoma. SDC can arise de novo or ex pleomorphic adenoma. To clarify the correlation of biomarker immunoprofile with clinicopathological findings and clinical outcome of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Impact Journals LLC
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5601711/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28938615 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.19812 |
_version_ | 1783264439120691200 |
---|---|
author | Takase, Soichiro Kano, Satoshi Tada, Yuichiro Kawakita, Daisuke Shimura, Tomotaka Hirai, Hideaki Tsukahara, Kiyoaki Shimizu, Akira Imanishi, Yorihisa Ozawa, Hiroyuki Okami, Kenji Sato, Yuichiro Sato, Yukiko Fushimi, Chihiro Okada, Takuro Sato, Hiroki Otsuka, Kuninori Watanabe, Yoshihiro Sakai, Akihiro Ebisumoto, Koji Togashi, Takafumi Ueki, Yushi Ota, Hisayuki Hanazawa, Toyoyuki Chazono, Hideaki Osamura, Robert Yoshiyuki Nagao, Toshitaka |
author_facet | Takase, Soichiro Kano, Satoshi Tada, Yuichiro Kawakita, Daisuke Shimura, Tomotaka Hirai, Hideaki Tsukahara, Kiyoaki Shimizu, Akira Imanishi, Yorihisa Ozawa, Hiroyuki Okami, Kenji Sato, Yuichiro Sato, Yukiko Fushimi, Chihiro Okada, Takuro Sato, Hiroki Otsuka, Kuninori Watanabe, Yoshihiro Sakai, Akihiro Ebisumoto, Koji Togashi, Takafumi Ueki, Yushi Ota, Hisayuki Hanazawa, Toyoyuki Chazono, Hideaki Osamura, Robert Yoshiyuki Nagao, Toshitaka |
author_sort | Takase, Soichiro |
collection | PubMed |
description | Salivary duct carcinoma (SDC) is an uncommon, aggressive malignant neoplasm histologically resembling high-grade mammary ductal carcinoma. SDC can arise de novo or ex pleomorphic adenoma. To clarify the correlation of biomarker immunoprofile with clinicopathological findings and clinical outcome of SDC, we conducted immunohistochemistry for EGFR, HER2, HER3, AR, CK5/6, p53, and Ki-67, along with HER2 fluorescence in situ hybridization in 151 SDCs. SDCs ex pleomorphic adenoma more commonly overexpressed EGFR, HER2, HER3, and Ki-67 than de novo SDCs (P = 0.015, < 0.001, 0.045, and 0.02, respectively). In multivariate analysis, AR− and CK5/6+ were associated with shorter progression-free survival (P = 0.027 and 0.004, respectively). Moreover, patients with p53-extreme negative/positive demonstrated poorer overall survival (P = 0.007). On assessing the revised classification by the combination of biomarker expression, the percentages of each subtype were as follows: ‘apocrine A’ (AR+/HER2−/Ki-67-low) (24%), ‘apocrine B’ (AR+/HER2−/Ki-67-high) (18%), ‘apocrine HER2’ (AR+/HER2+) (35%), ‘HER2-enriched’ (AR−/HER2+) (12%), and ‘double negative’ (AR−/HER2−) (11%). ‘Double negative’ was further subclassified into ‘basal-like’ (EGFR and/or CK5/6+) (7%) and ‘unclassified’ (3%). Consequently, patients with ‘apocrine A’ showed a better progression-free survival than those with any other subtypes. Our revised immunoprofiling classification was valuable for predicting the survival and might be useful in personalized therapy for patients with SDC. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5601711 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Impact Journals LLC |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56017112017-09-21 Biomarker immunoprofile in salivary duct carcinomas: clinicopathological and prognostic implications with evaluation of the revised classification Takase, Soichiro Kano, Satoshi Tada, Yuichiro Kawakita, Daisuke Shimura, Tomotaka Hirai, Hideaki Tsukahara, Kiyoaki Shimizu, Akira Imanishi, Yorihisa Ozawa, Hiroyuki Okami, Kenji Sato, Yuichiro Sato, Yukiko Fushimi, Chihiro Okada, Takuro Sato, Hiroki Otsuka, Kuninori Watanabe, Yoshihiro Sakai, Akihiro Ebisumoto, Koji Togashi, Takafumi Ueki, Yushi Ota, Hisayuki Hanazawa, Toyoyuki Chazono, Hideaki Osamura, Robert Yoshiyuki Nagao, Toshitaka Oncotarget Research Paper Salivary duct carcinoma (SDC) is an uncommon, aggressive malignant neoplasm histologically resembling high-grade mammary ductal carcinoma. SDC can arise de novo or ex pleomorphic adenoma. To clarify the correlation of biomarker immunoprofile with clinicopathological findings and clinical outcome of SDC, we conducted immunohistochemistry for EGFR, HER2, HER3, AR, CK5/6, p53, and Ki-67, along with HER2 fluorescence in situ hybridization in 151 SDCs. SDCs ex pleomorphic adenoma more commonly overexpressed EGFR, HER2, HER3, and Ki-67 than de novo SDCs (P = 0.015, < 0.001, 0.045, and 0.02, respectively). In multivariate analysis, AR− and CK5/6+ were associated with shorter progression-free survival (P = 0.027 and 0.004, respectively). Moreover, patients with p53-extreme negative/positive demonstrated poorer overall survival (P = 0.007). On assessing the revised classification by the combination of biomarker expression, the percentages of each subtype were as follows: ‘apocrine A’ (AR+/HER2−/Ki-67-low) (24%), ‘apocrine B’ (AR+/HER2−/Ki-67-high) (18%), ‘apocrine HER2’ (AR+/HER2+) (35%), ‘HER2-enriched’ (AR−/HER2+) (12%), and ‘double negative’ (AR−/HER2−) (11%). ‘Double negative’ was further subclassified into ‘basal-like’ (EGFR and/or CK5/6+) (7%) and ‘unclassified’ (3%). Consequently, patients with ‘apocrine A’ showed a better progression-free survival than those with any other subtypes. Our revised immunoprofiling classification was valuable for predicting the survival and might be useful in personalized therapy for patients with SDC. Impact Journals LLC 2017-08-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5601711/ /pubmed/28938615 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.19812 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Takase et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 3.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) (CC BY 3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Takase, Soichiro Kano, Satoshi Tada, Yuichiro Kawakita, Daisuke Shimura, Tomotaka Hirai, Hideaki Tsukahara, Kiyoaki Shimizu, Akira Imanishi, Yorihisa Ozawa, Hiroyuki Okami, Kenji Sato, Yuichiro Sato, Yukiko Fushimi, Chihiro Okada, Takuro Sato, Hiroki Otsuka, Kuninori Watanabe, Yoshihiro Sakai, Akihiro Ebisumoto, Koji Togashi, Takafumi Ueki, Yushi Ota, Hisayuki Hanazawa, Toyoyuki Chazono, Hideaki Osamura, Robert Yoshiyuki Nagao, Toshitaka Biomarker immunoprofile in salivary duct carcinomas: clinicopathological and prognostic implications with evaluation of the revised classification |
title | Biomarker immunoprofile in salivary duct carcinomas: clinicopathological and prognostic implications with evaluation of the revised classification |
title_full | Biomarker immunoprofile in salivary duct carcinomas: clinicopathological and prognostic implications with evaluation of the revised classification |
title_fullStr | Biomarker immunoprofile in salivary duct carcinomas: clinicopathological and prognostic implications with evaluation of the revised classification |
title_full_unstemmed | Biomarker immunoprofile in salivary duct carcinomas: clinicopathological and prognostic implications with evaluation of the revised classification |
title_short | Biomarker immunoprofile in salivary duct carcinomas: clinicopathological and prognostic implications with evaluation of the revised classification |
title_sort | biomarker immunoprofile in salivary duct carcinomas: clinicopathological and prognostic implications with evaluation of the revised classification |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5601711/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28938615 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.19812 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT takasesoichiro biomarkerimmunoprofileinsalivaryductcarcinomasclinicopathologicalandprognosticimplicationswithevaluationoftherevisedclassification AT kanosatoshi biomarkerimmunoprofileinsalivaryductcarcinomasclinicopathologicalandprognosticimplicationswithevaluationoftherevisedclassification AT tadayuichiro biomarkerimmunoprofileinsalivaryductcarcinomasclinicopathologicalandprognosticimplicationswithevaluationoftherevisedclassification AT kawakitadaisuke biomarkerimmunoprofileinsalivaryductcarcinomasclinicopathologicalandprognosticimplicationswithevaluationoftherevisedclassification AT shimuratomotaka biomarkerimmunoprofileinsalivaryductcarcinomasclinicopathologicalandprognosticimplicationswithevaluationoftherevisedclassification AT hiraihideaki biomarkerimmunoprofileinsalivaryductcarcinomasclinicopathologicalandprognosticimplicationswithevaluationoftherevisedclassification AT tsukaharakiyoaki biomarkerimmunoprofileinsalivaryductcarcinomasclinicopathologicalandprognosticimplicationswithevaluationoftherevisedclassification AT shimizuakira biomarkerimmunoprofileinsalivaryductcarcinomasclinicopathologicalandprognosticimplicationswithevaluationoftherevisedclassification AT imanishiyorihisa biomarkerimmunoprofileinsalivaryductcarcinomasclinicopathologicalandprognosticimplicationswithevaluationoftherevisedclassification AT ozawahiroyuki biomarkerimmunoprofileinsalivaryductcarcinomasclinicopathologicalandprognosticimplicationswithevaluationoftherevisedclassification AT okamikenji biomarkerimmunoprofileinsalivaryductcarcinomasclinicopathologicalandprognosticimplicationswithevaluationoftherevisedclassification AT satoyuichiro biomarkerimmunoprofileinsalivaryductcarcinomasclinicopathologicalandprognosticimplicationswithevaluationoftherevisedclassification AT satoyukiko biomarkerimmunoprofileinsalivaryductcarcinomasclinicopathologicalandprognosticimplicationswithevaluationoftherevisedclassification AT fushimichihiro biomarkerimmunoprofileinsalivaryductcarcinomasclinicopathologicalandprognosticimplicationswithevaluationoftherevisedclassification AT okadatakuro biomarkerimmunoprofileinsalivaryductcarcinomasclinicopathologicalandprognosticimplicationswithevaluationoftherevisedclassification AT satohiroki biomarkerimmunoprofileinsalivaryductcarcinomasclinicopathologicalandprognosticimplicationswithevaluationoftherevisedclassification AT otsukakuninori biomarkerimmunoprofileinsalivaryductcarcinomasclinicopathologicalandprognosticimplicationswithevaluationoftherevisedclassification AT watanabeyoshihiro biomarkerimmunoprofileinsalivaryductcarcinomasclinicopathologicalandprognosticimplicationswithevaluationoftherevisedclassification AT sakaiakihiro biomarkerimmunoprofileinsalivaryductcarcinomasclinicopathologicalandprognosticimplicationswithevaluationoftherevisedclassification AT ebisumotokoji biomarkerimmunoprofileinsalivaryductcarcinomasclinicopathologicalandprognosticimplicationswithevaluationoftherevisedclassification AT togashitakafumi biomarkerimmunoprofileinsalivaryductcarcinomasclinicopathologicalandprognosticimplicationswithevaluationoftherevisedclassification AT uekiyushi biomarkerimmunoprofileinsalivaryductcarcinomasclinicopathologicalandprognosticimplicationswithevaluationoftherevisedclassification AT otahisayuki biomarkerimmunoprofileinsalivaryductcarcinomasclinicopathologicalandprognosticimplicationswithevaluationoftherevisedclassification AT hanazawatoyoyuki biomarkerimmunoprofileinsalivaryductcarcinomasclinicopathologicalandprognosticimplicationswithevaluationoftherevisedclassification AT chazonohideaki biomarkerimmunoprofileinsalivaryductcarcinomasclinicopathologicalandprognosticimplicationswithevaluationoftherevisedclassification AT osamurarobertyoshiyuki biomarkerimmunoprofileinsalivaryductcarcinomasclinicopathologicalandprognosticimplicationswithevaluationoftherevisedclassification AT nagaotoshitaka biomarkerimmunoprofileinsalivaryductcarcinomasclinicopathologicalandprognosticimplicationswithevaluationoftherevisedclassification |