Cargando…

Can Communicating Personalised Disease Risk Promote Healthy Behaviour Change? A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews

BACKGROUND: The assessment and communication of disease risk that is personalised to the individual is widespread in healthcare contexts. Despite several systematic reviews of RCTs, it is unclear under what circumstances that personalised risk estimates promotes change in four key health-related beh...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: French, David P, Cameron, Elaine, Benton, Jack S, Deaton, Christi, Harvie, Michelle
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5602036/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28290066
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12160-017-9895-z
_version_ 1783264508134817792
author French, David P
Cameron, Elaine
Benton, Jack S
Deaton, Christi
Harvie, Michelle
author_facet French, David P
Cameron, Elaine
Benton, Jack S
Deaton, Christi
Harvie, Michelle
author_sort French, David P
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The assessment and communication of disease risk that is personalised to the individual is widespread in healthcare contexts. Despite several systematic reviews of RCTs, it is unclear under what circumstances that personalised risk estimates promotes change in four key health-related behaviours: smoking, physical activity, diet and alcohol consumption. PURPOSE: The present research aims to systematically identify, evaluate and synthesise the findings of existing systematic reviews. METHODS: This systematic review of systematic reviews followed published guidance. A search of four databases and two-stage screening procedure with good reliability identified nine eligible systematic reviews. RESULTS: The nine reviews each included between three and 15 primary studies, containing 36 unique studies. Methods of personalising risk feedback included imaging/visual feedback, genetic testing, and numerical estimation from risk algorithms. The reviews were generally high quality. For a broad range of methods of estimating and communicating risk, the reviews found no evidence that risk information had strong or consistent effects on health-related behaviours. The most promising effects came from interventions using visual or imaging techniques and with smoking cessation and dietary behaviour as outcomes, but with inconsistent results. Few interventions explicitly used theory, few targeted self-efficacy or response efficacy, and a limited range of Behaviour Change Techniques were used. CONCLUSIONS: Presenting risk information on its own, even when highly personalised, does not produce strong effects on health-related behaviours or changes which are sustained. Future research in this area should build on the existing knowledge base about increasing the effects of risk communication on behaviour. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s12160-017-9895-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5602036
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56020362017-10-04 Can Communicating Personalised Disease Risk Promote Healthy Behaviour Change? A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews French, David P Cameron, Elaine Benton, Jack S Deaton, Christi Harvie, Michelle Ann Behav Med Original Article BACKGROUND: The assessment and communication of disease risk that is personalised to the individual is widespread in healthcare contexts. Despite several systematic reviews of RCTs, it is unclear under what circumstances that personalised risk estimates promotes change in four key health-related behaviours: smoking, physical activity, diet and alcohol consumption. PURPOSE: The present research aims to systematically identify, evaluate and synthesise the findings of existing systematic reviews. METHODS: This systematic review of systematic reviews followed published guidance. A search of four databases and two-stage screening procedure with good reliability identified nine eligible systematic reviews. RESULTS: The nine reviews each included between three and 15 primary studies, containing 36 unique studies. Methods of personalising risk feedback included imaging/visual feedback, genetic testing, and numerical estimation from risk algorithms. The reviews were generally high quality. For a broad range of methods of estimating and communicating risk, the reviews found no evidence that risk information had strong or consistent effects on health-related behaviours. The most promising effects came from interventions using visual or imaging techniques and with smoking cessation and dietary behaviour as outcomes, but with inconsistent results. Few interventions explicitly used theory, few targeted self-efficacy or response efficacy, and a limited range of Behaviour Change Techniques were used. CONCLUSIONS: Presenting risk information on its own, even when highly personalised, does not produce strong effects on health-related behaviours or changes which are sustained. Future research in this area should build on the existing knowledge base about increasing the effects of risk communication on behaviour. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s12160-017-9895-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2017-03-13 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5602036/ /pubmed/28290066 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12160-017-9895-z Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
French, David P
Cameron, Elaine
Benton, Jack S
Deaton, Christi
Harvie, Michelle
Can Communicating Personalised Disease Risk Promote Healthy Behaviour Change? A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews
title Can Communicating Personalised Disease Risk Promote Healthy Behaviour Change? A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews
title_full Can Communicating Personalised Disease Risk Promote Healthy Behaviour Change? A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews
title_fullStr Can Communicating Personalised Disease Risk Promote Healthy Behaviour Change? A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews
title_full_unstemmed Can Communicating Personalised Disease Risk Promote Healthy Behaviour Change? A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews
title_short Can Communicating Personalised Disease Risk Promote Healthy Behaviour Change? A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews
title_sort can communicating personalised disease risk promote healthy behaviour change? a systematic review of systematic reviews
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5602036/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28290066
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12160-017-9895-z
work_keys_str_mv AT frenchdavidp cancommunicatingpersonaliseddiseaseriskpromotehealthybehaviourchangeasystematicreviewofsystematicreviews
AT cameronelaine cancommunicatingpersonaliseddiseaseriskpromotehealthybehaviourchangeasystematicreviewofsystematicreviews
AT bentonjacks cancommunicatingpersonaliseddiseaseriskpromotehealthybehaviourchangeasystematicreviewofsystematicreviews
AT deatonchristi cancommunicatingpersonaliseddiseaseriskpromotehealthybehaviourchangeasystematicreviewofsystematicreviews
AT harviemichelle cancommunicatingpersonaliseddiseaseriskpromotehealthybehaviourchangeasystematicreviewofsystematicreviews