Cargando…

Ganglion cell layer segmentation and the two-flash multifocal electroretinogram improve structure function analysis in early glaucoma

PURPOSE: To improve structure-function analysis in primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) by including the two-global flash multifocal electroretinogram (2F–mfERG) and macular ganglion cell layer segmentation. METHODS: Twenty-five glaucoma patients (six pre-perimetric (PPG), 19 POAG) and 16 controls und...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brandao, Livia M., Ledolter, Anna A., Monhart, Matthias, Schötzau, Andreas, Palmowski-Wolfe, Anja M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5602085/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28779363
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00417-017-3722-x
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: To improve structure-function analysis in primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) by including the two-global flash multifocal electroretinogram (2F–mfERG) and macular ganglion cell layer segmentation. METHODS: Twenty-five glaucoma patients (six pre-perimetric (PPG), 19 POAG) and 16 controls underwent 2F–mfERG, optical coherence tomography (OCT), and standard automated perimetry (SAP). For 2F–mfERG, the root mean square was calculated for the focal flash response at 15–45 ms (DC) and the global flash responses at 45–75 ms (IC1) and 75–105 ms (IC2). For OCT, macular total thickness (mT) and ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) thickness were analysed. Values from the central 10° and 15° of 2F-mfERG were compared to the corresponding areas from OCT and visual field. RESULTS: Both PPG and POAG had significantly lower mfERG responses in the central 10° and 15° than the control group. Of the glaucoma patients, 30.7% (three PPG, five POAG) showed central mfERG and GCIPL reduction without a SAP defect in the central 15 degrees. Four patients had a central SAP defect associated with a reduced GCIPL without any detectable dysfunction on mfERG. MfERG DC and IC2 were larger with increased mT (p ≤ 0.02), but GCIPL only related positively to IC2 (p = 0.027). SAP sensitivity also increased with thicker mT but not with GCIPL (p < 0.03 and p = 0.35). DC, IC2, and GCIPL could best differentiate glaucoma from control (AUC values: 0.897, 0.903, and 0.905). CONCLUSIONS: Structure function analysis in glaucoma can be improved when the GCIPL thickness as well as the 2F–mfERG is included as these measures complement information obtained by SAP.