Cargando…
A controlled comparison of the BacT/ALERT® 3D and VIRTUO™ microbial detection systems
The performance of the next-generation BacT/ALERT® VIRTUO™ Microbial Detection System (VIRTUO™, bioMérieux Inc., Hazelwood, MO) was compared to the BacT/ALERT® 3D Microbial Detection System (3D, bioMérieux Inc., Durham, NC) using BacT/ALERT® FA Plus (FA Plus), BacT/ALERT® PF Plus (PF Plus), BacT/ALE...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5602088/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28500506 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10096-017-2994-8 |
_version_ | 1783264520192393216 |
---|---|
author | Totty, H. Ullery, M. Spontak, J. Viray, J. Adamik, M. Katzin, B. Dunne, W. M. Deol, P. |
author_facet | Totty, H. Ullery, M. Spontak, J. Viray, J. Adamik, M. Katzin, B. Dunne, W. M. Deol, P. |
author_sort | Totty, H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The performance of the next-generation BacT/ALERT® VIRTUO™ Microbial Detection System (VIRTUO™, bioMérieux Inc., Hazelwood, MO) was compared to the BacT/ALERT® 3D Microbial Detection System (3D, bioMérieux Inc., Durham, NC) using BacT/ALERT® FA Plus (FA Plus), BacT/ALERT® PF Plus (PF Plus), BacT/ALERT® FN Plus (FN Plus), BacT/ALERT® Standard Aerobic (SA), and BacT/ALERT® Standard Anaerobic (SN) blood culture bottles (bioMérieux Inc., Durham, NC). A seeded limit of detection (LoD) study was performed for each bottle type in both systems. The LoD studies demonstrated that both systems were capable of detecting organisms at nearly identical levels [<10 colony-forming units (CFU) per bottle], with no significant difference. Following LoD determination, a seeded study was performed to compare the time to detection (TTD) between the systems using a panel of clinically relevant microorganisms inoculated at or near the LoD with 0, 4, or 10 mL of healthy human blood. VIRTUO™ exhibited a faster TTD by an average of 3.5 h, as well as demonstrated a significantly improved detection rate of 99.9% compared to 98.8% with 3D (p-value <0.05). ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10096-017-2994-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5602088 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56020882017-10-04 A controlled comparison of the BacT/ALERT® 3D and VIRTUO™ microbial detection systems Totty, H. Ullery, M. Spontak, J. Viray, J. Adamik, M. Katzin, B. Dunne, W. M. Deol, P. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis Original Article The performance of the next-generation BacT/ALERT® VIRTUO™ Microbial Detection System (VIRTUO™, bioMérieux Inc., Hazelwood, MO) was compared to the BacT/ALERT® 3D Microbial Detection System (3D, bioMérieux Inc., Durham, NC) using BacT/ALERT® FA Plus (FA Plus), BacT/ALERT® PF Plus (PF Plus), BacT/ALERT® FN Plus (FN Plus), BacT/ALERT® Standard Aerobic (SA), and BacT/ALERT® Standard Anaerobic (SN) blood culture bottles (bioMérieux Inc., Durham, NC). A seeded limit of detection (LoD) study was performed for each bottle type in both systems. The LoD studies demonstrated that both systems were capable of detecting organisms at nearly identical levels [<10 colony-forming units (CFU) per bottle], with no significant difference. Following LoD determination, a seeded study was performed to compare the time to detection (TTD) between the systems using a panel of clinically relevant microorganisms inoculated at or near the LoD with 0, 4, or 10 mL of healthy human blood. VIRTUO™ exhibited a faster TTD by an average of 3.5 h, as well as demonstrated a significantly improved detection rate of 99.9% compared to 98.8% with 3D (p-value <0.05). ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10096-017-2994-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017-05-12 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5602088/ /pubmed/28500506 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10096-017-2994-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Totty, H. Ullery, M. Spontak, J. Viray, J. Adamik, M. Katzin, B. Dunne, W. M. Deol, P. A controlled comparison of the BacT/ALERT® 3D and VIRTUO™ microbial detection systems |
title | A controlled comparison of the BacT/ALERT® 3D and VIRTUO™ microbial detection systems |
title_full | A controlled comparison of the BacT/ALERT® 3D and VIRTUO™ microbial detection systems |
title_fullStr | A controlled comparison of the BacT/ALERT® 3D and VIRTUO™ microbial detection systems |
title_full_unstemmed | A controlled comparison of the BacT/ALERT® 3D and VIRTUO™ microbial detection systems |
title_short | A controlled comparison of the BacT/ALERT® 3D and VIRTUO™ microbial detection systems |
title_sort | controlled comparison of the bact/alert® 3d and virtuo™ microbial detection systems |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5602088/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28500506 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10096-017-2994-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tottyh acontrolledcomparisonofthebactalert3dandvirtuomicrobialdetectionsystems AT ullerym acontrolledcomparisonofthebactalert3dandvirtuomicrobialdetectionsystems AT spontakj acontrolledcomparisonofthebactalert3dandvirtuomicrobialdetectionsystems AT virayj acontrolledcomparisonofthebactalert3dandvirtuomicrobialdetectionsystems AT adamikm acontrolledcomparisonofthebactalert3dandvirtuomicrobialdetectionsystems AT katzinb acontrolledcomparisonofthebactalert3dandvirtuomicrobialdetectionsystems AT dunnewm acontrolledcomparisonofthebactalert3dandvirtuomicrobialdetectionsystems AT deolp acontrolledcomparisonofthebactalert3dandvirtuomicrobialdetectionsystems AT tottyh controlledcomparisonofthebactalert3dandvirtuomicrobialdetectionsystems AT ullerym controlledcomparisonofthebactalert3dandvirtuomicrobialdetectionsystems AT spontakj controlledcomparisonofthebactalert3dandvirtuomicrobialdetectionsystems AT virayj controlledcomparisonofthebactalert3dandvirtuomicrobialdetectionsystems AT adamikm controlledcomparisonofthebactalert3dandvirtuomicrobialdetectionsystems AT katzinb controlledcomparisonofthebactalert3dandvirtuomicrobialdetectionsystems AT dunnewm controlledcomparisonofthebactalert3dandvirtuomicrobialdetectionsystems AT deolp controlledcomparisonofthebactalert3dandvirtuomicrobialdetectionsystems |