Cargando…

Renal volumetry with magnetic resonance imaging

BACKGROUND: No gold standard exists for renal volumetry in vivo. PURPOSE: To devise and evaluate segmentation methods on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) datasets. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Five combinations of MRI pulse sequences and measuring methods were used to measure the renal volumes of five men...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Christensen, Rolf H, Lundgren, Torbjörn, Stenvinkel, Peter, Brismar, Torkel B
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5602223/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28944081
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2058460117731120
_version_ 1783264539981119488
author Christensen, Rolf H
Lundgren, Torbjörn
Stenvinkel, Peter
Brismar, Torkel B
author_facet Christensen, Rolf H
Lundgren, Torbjörn
Stenvinkel, Peter
Brismar, Torkel B
author_sort Christensen, Rolf H
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: No gold standard exists for renal volumetry in vivo. PURPOSE: To devise and evaluate segmentation methods on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) datasets. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Five combinations of MRI pulse sequences and measuring methods were used to measure the renal volumes of five men aged 54–72 years scanned before autologous renal stem cell transplantation and three, six, and 12 months post transplantation. RESULTS: Renal volume did not change after stem cell transplantation. The results varied considerably: the reproducibility (coefficient of variation) was 4.0–6.0% and measurements took 1–13 min per kidney. Manual segmentation of images from the volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination (VIBE) without fat saturation sequence provided best reproducibility but was time-consuming. Use of the ellipsoid formula from half Fourier acquisition single shot turbo spin echo (HASTE) provided the fastest measurement, but resulted in lower reproducibility. CONCLUSION: Renal volumetry based on images from the pulse sequence VIBE without fat saturation acquired using an out-of-phase TE may be investigated further, possibly in combination with the quick ellipsoid formula.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5602223
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56022232017-09-22 Renal volumetry with magnetic resonance imaging Christensen, Rolf H Lundgren, Torbjörn Stenvinkel, Peter Brismar, Torkel B Acta Radiol Open Research BACKGROUND: No gold standard exists for renal volumetry in vivo. PURPOSE: To devise and evaluate segmentation methods on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) datasets. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Five combinations of MRI pulse sequences and measuring methods were used to measure the renal volumes of five men aged 54–72 years scanned before autologous renal stem cell transplantation and three, six, and 12 months post transplantation. RESULTS: Renal volume did not change after stem cell transplantation. The results varied considerably: the reproducibility (coefficient of variation) was 4.0–6.0% and measurements took 1–13 min per kidney. Manual segmentation of images from the volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination (VIBE) without fat saturation sequence provided best reproducibility but was time-consuming. Use of the ellipsoid formula from half Fourier acquisition single shot turbo spin echo (HASTE) provided the fastest measurement, but resulted in lower reproducibility. CONCLUSION: Renal volumetry based on images from the pulse sequence VIBE without fat saturation acquired using an out-of-phase TE may be investigated further, possibly in combination with the quick ellipsoid formula. SAGE Publications 2017-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5602223/ /pubmed/28944081 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2058460117731120 Text en © The Foundation Acta Radiologica 2017 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Research
Christensen, Rolf H
Lundgren, Torbjörn
Stenvinkel, Peter
Brismar, Torkel B
Renal volumetry with magnetic resonance imaging
title Renal volumetry with magnetic resonance imaging
title_full Renal volumetry with magnetic resonance imaging
title_fullStr Renal volumetry with magnetic resonance imaging
title_full_unstemmed Renal volumetry with magnetic resonance imaging
title_short Renal volumetry with magnetic resonance imaging
title_sort renal volumetry with magnetic resonance imaging
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5602223/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28944081
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2058460117731120
work_keys_str_mv AT christensenrolfh renalvolumetrywithmagneticresonanceimaging
AT lundgrentorbjorn renalvolumetrywithmagneticresonanceimaging
AT stenvinkelpeter renalvolumetrywithmagneticresonanceimaging
AT brismartorkelb renalvolumetrywithmagneticresonanceimaging