Cargando…
Renal volumetry with magnetic resonance imaging
BACKGROUND: No gold standard exists for renal volumetry in vivo. PURPOSE: To devise and evaluate segmentation methods on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) datasets. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Five combinations of MRI pulse sequences and measuring methods were used to measure the renal volumes of five men...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5602223/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28944081 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2058460117731120 |
_version_ | 1783264539981119488 |
---|---|
author | Christensen, Rolf H Lundgren, Torbjörn Stenvinkel, Peter Brismar, Torkel B |
author_facet | Christensen, Rolf H Lundgren, Torbjörn Stenvinkel, Peter Brismar, Torkel B |
author_sort | Christensen, Rolf H |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: No gold standard exists for renal volumetry in vivo. PURPOSE: To devise and evaluate segmentation methods on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) datasets. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Five combinations of MRI pulse sequences and measuring methods were used to measure the renal volumes of five men aged 54–72 years scanned before autologous renal stem cell transplantation and three, six, and 12 months post transplantation. RESULTS: Renal volume did not change after stem cell transplantation. The results varied considerably: the reproducibility (coefficient of variation) was 4.0–6.0% and measurements took 1–13 min per kidney. Manual segmentation of images from the volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination (VIBE) without fat saturation sequence provided best reproducibility but was time-consuming. Use of the ellipsoid formula from half Fourier acquisition single shot turbo spin echo (HASTE) provided the fastest measurement, but resulted in lower reproducibility. CONCLUSION: Renal volumetry based on images from the pulse sequence VIBE without fat saturation acquired using an out-of-phase TE may be investigated further, possibly in combination with the quick ellipsoid formula. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5602223 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56022232017-09-22 Renal volumetry with magnetic resonance imaging Christensen, Rolf H Lundgren, Torbjörn Stenvinkel, Peter Brismar, Torkel B Acta Radiol Open Research BACKGROUND: No gold standard exists for renal volumetry in vivo. PURPOSE: To devise and evaluate segmentation methods on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) datasets. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Five combinations of MRI pulse sequences and measuring methods were used to measure the renal volumes of five men aged 54–72 years scanned before autologous renal stem cell transplantation and three, six, and 12 months post transplantation. RESULTS: Renal volume did not change after stem cell transplantation. The results varied considerably: the reproducibility (coefficient of variation) was 4.0–6.0% and measurements took 1–13 min per kidney. Manual segmentation of images from the volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination (VIBE) without fat saturation sequence provided best reproducibility but was time-consuming. Use of the ellipsoid formula from half Fourier acquisition single shot turbo spin echo (HASTE) provided the fastest measurement, but resulted in lower reproducibility. CONCLUSION: Renal volumetry based on images from the pulse sequence VIBE without fat saturation acquired using an out-of-phase TE may be investigated further, possibly in combination with the quick ellipsoid formula. SAGE Publications 2017-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5602223/ /pubmed/28944081 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2058460117731120 Text en © The Foundation Acta Radiologica 2017 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Research Christensen, Rolf H Lundgren, Torbjörn Stenvinkel, Peter Brismar, Torkel B Renal volumetry with magnetic resonance imaging |
title | Renal volumetry with magnetic resonance imaging |
title_full | Renal volumetry with magnetic resonance imaging |
title_fullStr | Renal volumetry with magnetic resonance imaging |
title_full_unstemmed | Renal volumetry with magnetic resonance imaging |
title_short | Renal volumetry with magnetic resonance imaging |
title_sort | renal volumetry with magnetic resonance imaging |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5602223/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28944081 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2058460117731120 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT christensenrolfh renalvolumetrywithmagneticresonanceimaging AT lundgrentorbjorn renalvolumetrywithmagneticresonanceimaging AT stenvinkelpeter renalvolumetrywithmagneticresonanceimaging AT brismartorkelb renalvolumetrywithmagneticresonanceimaging |