Cargando…

Questioning patient engagement: research scientists’ perceptions of the challenges of patient engagement in a cardiovascular research network

BACKGROUND: Patient engagement in research is a dominant discourse in clinical research settings as it is seen as a move toward sustainable and equitable health care systems. In Canada, a key driver is the Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research of the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, which as...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Carroll, Sandra L, Embuldeniya, Gayathri, Abelson, Julia, McGillion, Michael, Berkesse, Alexandre, Healey, Jeff S
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5602467/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28979105
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S135457
_version_ 1783264573852221440
author Carroll, Sandra L
Embuldeniya, Gayathri
Abelson, Julia
McGillion, Michael
Berkesse, Alexandre
Healey, Jeff S
author_facet Carroll, Sandra L
Embuldeniya, Gayathri
Abelson, Julia
McGillion, Michael
Berkesse, Alexandre
Healey, Jeff S
author_sort Carroll, Sandra L
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patient engagement in research is a dominant discourse in clinical research settings as it is seen as a move toward sustainable and equitable health care systems. In Canada, a key driver is the Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research of the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, which asserts that meaningful patient engagement can only be fostered when stakeholders understand its value. This study assessed researchers’ perceptions of the meaning and value of patient engagement in research within a Canadian cardiovascular research network. In doing so, the secondary aim was to inform the development of a structured patient engagement initiative by identifying potential challenges and related mitigation strategies. METHODS: We employed a multi-method strategy involving electronic surveys and semi-structured telephone interviews with network research scientists across Canada. Interview data were analyzed using thematic and content analysis. Survey data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Thirty-eight electronic surveys (response rate =33%) and 16 interviews were completed with network members. Some participants were uncertain about the meaning and value of patient engagement. While voicing guarded support, four challenges relating to patient engagement were identified from the interviews: 1) identification of representative and appropriate patients, 2) uncertainty about the scope of patients’ roles given concerns about knowledge discrepancies, 3) a perceived lack of evidence of the impact of patient engagement, and 4) the need for education and culture change as a prerequisite for patient engagement. Research scientists were largely concerned that patients untrained in science and tasked with conveying an authentic patient experience and being a conduit for the voices of others might unsettle a traditional model of conducting research. CONCLUSION: Concerns about patient involvement in research were related to a lack of clarity about the meaning, process, and impact of involvement. This study highlights the need for education on the meaning of patient engagement, evidence of its impact, and guidance on practical aspects of implementation within this research community.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5602467
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56024672017-10-04 Questioning patient engagement: research scientists’ perceptions of the challenges of patient engagement in a cardiovascular research network Carroll, Sandra L Embuldeniya, Gayathri Abelson, Julia McGillion, Michael Berkesse, Alexandre Healey, Jeff S Patient Prefer Adherence Original Research BACKGROUND: Patient engagement in research is a dominant discourse in clinical research settings as it is seen as a move toward sustainable and equitable health care systems. In Canada, a key driver is the Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research of the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, which asserts that meaningful patient engagement can only be fostered when stakeholders understand its value. This study assessed researchers’ perceptions of the meaning and value of patient engagement in research within a Canadian cardiovascular research network. In doing so, the secondary aim was to inform the development of a structured patient engagement initiative by identifying potential challenges and related mitigation strategies. METHODS: We employed a multi-method strategy involving electronic surveys and semi-structured telephone interviews with network research scientists across Canada. Interview data were analyzed using thematic and content analysis. Survey data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Thirty-eight electronic surveys (response rate =33%) and 16 interviews were completed with network members. Some participants were uncertain about the meaning and value of patient engagement. While voicing guarded support, four challenges relating to patient engagement were identified from the interviews: 1) identification of representative and appropriate patients, 2) uncertainty about the scope of patients’ roles given concerns about knowledge discrepancies, 3) a perceived lack of evidence of the impact of patient engagement, and 4) the need for education and culture change as a prerequisite for patient engagement. Research scientists were largely concerned that patients untrained in science and tasked with conveying an authentic patient experience and being a conduit for the voices of others might unsettle a traditional model of conducting research. CONCLUSION: Concerns about patient involvement in research were related to a lack of clarity about the meaning, process, and impact of involvement. This study highlights the need for education on the meaning of patient engagement, evidence of its impact, and guidance on practical aspects of implementation within this research community. Dove Medical Press 2017-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5602467/ /pubmed/28979105 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S135457 Text en © 2017 Carroll et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Carroll, Sandra L
Embuldeniya, Gayathri
Abelson, Julia
McGillion, Michael
Berkesse, Alexandre
Healey, Jeff S
Questioning patient engagement: research scientists’ perceptions of the challenges of patient engagement in a cardiovascular research network
title Questioning patient engagement: research scientists’ perceptions of the challenges of patient engagement in a cardiovascular research network
title_full Questioning patient engagement: research scientists’ perceptions of the challenges of patient engagement in a cardiovascular research network
title_fullStr Questioning patient engagement: research scientists’ perceptions of the challenges of patient engagement in a cardiovascular research network
title_full_unstemmed Questioning patient engagement: research scientists’ perceptions of the challenges of patient engagement in a cardiovascular research network
title_short Questioning patient engagement: research scientists’ perceptions of the challenges of patient engagement in a cardiovascular research network
title_sort questioning patient engagement: research scientists’ perceptions of the challenges of patient engagement in a cardiovascular research network
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5602467/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28979105
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S135457
work_keys_str_mv AT carrollsandral questioningpatientengagementresearchscientistsperceptionsofthechallengesofpatientengagementinacardiovascularresearchnetwork
AT embuldeniyagayathri questioningpatientengagementresearchscientistsperceptionsofthechallengesofpatientengagementinacardiovascularresearchnetwork
AT abelsonjulia questioningpatientengagementresearchscientistsperceptionsofthechallengesofpatientengagementinacardiovascularresearchnetwork
AT mcgillionmichael questioningpatientengagementresearchscientistsperceptionsofthechallengesofpatientengagementinacardiovascularresearchnetwork
AT berkessealexandre questioningpatientengagementresearchscientistsperceptionsofthechallengesofpatientengagementinacardiovascularresearchnetwork
AT healeyjeffs questioningpatientengagementresearchscientistsperceptionsofthechallengesofpatientengagementinacardiovascularresearchnetwork