Cargando…

Patient-reported outcome assessment of inflammatory arthritis patient experience with intravenously administered biologic therapy

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate patient perspectives regarding utilization of intravenous (IV) therapy for inflammatory arthritis (IA). METHODS: This was a single-center, noninterventional, patient questionnaire-based study of adult IA patients currently receiving IV biologics. At a single visit, patients co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gaylis, Norman B, Sagliani, Joanne, Black, Shawn, Tang, Kezhen L, DeHoratius, Raphael, Kafka, Wesley A, Parenti, Dennis
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5602473/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28979103
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S136567
_version_ 1783264575284576256
author Gaylis, Norman B
Sagliani, Joanne
Black, Shawn
Tang, Kezhen L
DeHoratius, Raphael
Kafka, Wesley A
Parenti, Dennis
author_facet Gaylis, Norman B
Sagliani, Joanne
Black, Shawn
Tang, Kezhen L
DeHoratius, Raphael
Kafka, Wesley A
Parenti, Dennis
author_sort Gaylis, Norman B
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate patient perspectives regarding utilization of intravenous (IV) therapy for inflammatory arthritis (IA). METHODS: This was a single-center, noninterventional, patient questionnaire-based study of adult IA patients currently receiving IV biologics. At a single visit, patients completed the questionnaire comprising 30 questions centered on their experience receiving an intravenously administered therapy to treat their IA. The questionnaire included questions on patient demographics, disease characteristics, and previous biologic treatment for IA (subcutaneous [SC] and IV). Patients rated their level of agreement with statements regarding satisfaction with current IV biologic therapy and potential advantages and disadvantages of IV biologic therapy using a 5-point Likert scale (1= strongly disagree, 5= strongly agree). RESULTS: One hundred patients were enrolled and completed the survey; 66% were female and the mean age was 58 years. Before IV treatment, 97% of patients received information regarding therapy options. Ninety patients ranked their satisfaction with current IV therapy as 4 or 5. The proportion of patients with an “extremely favorable” perception of IV therapy increased from 33% to 71% following initiation of their current medication. Thirty-one patients had previously received SC therapies to treat their IA. CONCLUSION: These results demonstrated an overall favorable perception of IV therapy among this patient population. Patients previously treated with SC therapy also had a positive shift in the perception of IV therapy after initiating IV therapy. Patients’ perception and preference for treatment options should be highly considered by the treating physician during or as part of a shared decision-making process.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5602473
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56024732017-10-04 Patient-reported outcome assessment of inflammatory arthritis patient experience with intravenously administered biologic therapy Gaylis, Norman B Sagliani, Joanne Black, Shawn Tang, Kezhen L DeHoratius, Raphael Kafka, Wesley A Parenti, Dennis Patient Prefer Adherence Original Research OBJECTIVE: To evaluate patient perspectives regarding utilization of intravenous (IV) therapy for inflammatory arthritis (IA). METHODS: This was a single-center, noninterventional, patient questionnaire-based study of adult IA patients currently receiving IV biologics. At a single visit, patients completed the questionnaire comprising 30 questions centered on their experience receiving an intravenously administered therapy to treat their IA. The questionnaire included questions on patient demographics, disease characteristics, and previous biologic treatment for IA (subcutaneous [SC] and IV). Patients rated their level of agreement with statements regarding satisfaction with current IV biologic therapy and potential advantages and disadvantages of IV biologic therapy using a 5-point Likert scale (1= strongly disagree, 5= strongly agree). RESULTS: One hundred patients were enrolled and completed the survey; 66% were female and the mean age was 58 years. Before IV treatment, 97% of patients received information regarding therapy options. Ninety patients ranked their satisfaction with current IV therapy as 4 or 5. The proportion of patients with an “extremely favorable” perception of IV therapy increased from 33% to 71% following initiation of their current medication. Thirty-one patients had previously received SC therapies to treat their IA. CONCLUSION: These results demonstrated an overall favorable perception of IV therapy among this patient population. Patients previously treated with SC therapy also had a positive shift in the perception of IV therapy after initiating IV therapy. Patients’ perception and preference for treatment options should be highly considered by the treating physician during or as part of a shared decision-making process. Dove Medical Press 2017-09-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5602473/ /pubmed/28979103 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S136567 Text en © 2017 Gaylis et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Gaylis, Norman B
Sagliani, Joanne
Black, Shawn
Tang, Kezhen L
DeHoratius, Raphael
Kafka, Wesley A
Parenti, Dennis
Patient-reported outcome assessment of inflammatory arthritis patient experience with intravenously administered biologic therapy
title Patient-reported outcome assessment of inflammatory arthritis patient experience with intravenously administered biologic therapy
title_full Patient-reported outcome assessment of inflammatory arthritis patient experience with intravenously administered biologic therapy
title_fullStr Patient-reported outcome assessment of inflammatory arthritis patient experience with intravenously administered biologic therapy
title_full_unstemmed Patient-reported outcome assessment of inflammatory arthritis patient experience with intravenously administered biologic therapy
title_short Patient-reported outcome assessment of inflammatory arthritis patient experience with intravenously administered biologic therapy
title_sort patient-reported outcome assessment of inflammatory arthritis patient experience with intravenously administered biologic therapy
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5602473/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28979103
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S136567
work_keys_str_mv AT gaylisnormanb patientreportedoutcomeassessmentofinflammatoryarthritispatientexperiencewithintravenouslyadministeredbiologictherapy
AT saglianijoanne patientreportedoutcomeassessmentofinflammatoryarthritispatientexperiencewithintravenouslyadministeredbiologictherapy
AT blackshawn patientreportedoutcomeassessmentofinflammatoryarthritispatientexperiencewithintravenouslyadministeredbiologictherapy
AT tangkezhenl patientreportedoutcomeassessmentofinflammatoryarthritispatientexperiencewithintravenouslyadministeredbiologictherapy
AT dehoratiusraphael patientreportedoutcomeassessmentofinflammatoryarthritispatientexperiencewithintravenouslyadministeredbiologictherapy
AT kafkawesleya patientreportedoutcomeassessmentofinflammatoryarthritispatientexperiencewithintravenouslyadministeredbiologictherapy
AT parentidennis patientreportedoutcomeassessmentofinflammatoryarthritispatientexperiencewithintravenouslyadministeredbiologictherapy