Cargando…
Knowledge evolution in physics research: An analysis of bibliographic coupling networks
Even as we advance the frontiers of physics knowledge, our understanding of how this knowledge evolves remains at the descriptive levels of Popper and Kuhn. Using the American Physical Society (APS) publications data sets, we ask in this paper how new knowledge is built upon old knowledge. We do so...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5602641/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28922427 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0184821 |
_version_ | 1783264595917406208 |
---|---|
author | Liu, Wenyuan Nanetti, Andrea Cheong, Siew Ann |
author_facet | Liu, Wenyuan Nanetti, Andrea Cheong, Siew Ann |
author_sort | Liu, Wenyuan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Even as we advance the frontiers of physics knowledge, our understanding of how this knowledge evolves remains at the descriptive levels of Popper and Kuhn. Using the American Physical Society (APS) publications data sets, we ask in this paper how new knowledge is built upon old knowledge. We do so by constructing year-to-year bibliographic coupling networks, and identify in them validated communities that represent different research fields. We then visualize their evolutionary relationships in the form of alluvial diagrams, and show how they remain intact through APS journal splits. Quantitatively, we see that most fields undergo weak Popperian mixing, and it is rare for a field to remain isolated/undergo strong mixing. The sizes of fields obey a simple linear growth with recombination. We can also reliably predict the merging between two fields, but not for the considerably more complex splitting. Finally, we report a case study of two fields that underwent repeated merging and splitting around 1995, and how these Kuhnian events are correlated with breakthroughs on Bose-Einstein condensation (BEC), quantum teleportation, and slow light. This impact showed up quantitatively in the citations of the BEC field as a larger proportion of references from during and shortly after these events. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5602641 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56026412017-09-22 Knowledge evolution in physics research: An analysis of bibliographic coupling networks Liu, Wenyuan Nanetti, Andrea Cheong, Siew Ann PLoS One Research Article Even as we advance the frontiers of physics knowledge, our understanding of how this knowledge evolves remains at the descriptive levels of Popper and Kuhn. Using the American Physical Society (APS) publications data sets, we ask in this paper how new knowledge is built upon old knowledge. We do so by constructing year-to-year bibliographic coupling networks, and identify in them validated communities that represent different research fields. We then visualize their evolutionary relationships in the form of alluvial diagrams, and show how they remain intact through APS journal splits. Quantitatively, we see that most fields undergo weak Popperian mixing, and it is rare for a field to remain isolated/undergo strong mixing. The sizes of fields obey a simple linear growth with recombination. We can also reliably predict the merging between two fields, but not for the considerably more complex splitting. Finally, we report a case study of two fields that underwent repeated merging and splitting around 1995, and how these Kuhnian events are correlated with breakthroughs on Bose-Einstein condensation (BEC), quantum teleportation, and slow light. This impact showed up quantitatively in the citations of the BEC field as a larger proportion of references from during and shortly after these events. Public Library of Science 2017-09-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5602641/ /pubmed/28922427 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0184821 Text en © 2017 Liu et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Liu, Wenyuan Nanetti, Andrea Cheong, Siew Ann Knowledge evolution in physics research: An analysis of bibliographic coupling networks |
title | Knowledge evolution in physics research: An analysis of bibliographic coupling networks |
title_full | Knowledge evolution in physics research: An analysis of bibliographic coupling networks |
title_fullStr | Knowledge evolution in physics research: An analysis of bibliographic coupling networks |
title_full_unstemmed | Knowledge evolution in physics research: An analysis of bibliographic coupling networks |
title_short | Knowledge evolution in physics research: An analysis of bibliographic coupling networks |
title_sort | knowledge evolution in physics research: an analysis of bibliographic coupling networks |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5602641/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28922427 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0184821 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liuwenyuan knowledgeevolutioninphysicsresearchananalysisofbibliographiccouplingnetworks AT nanettiandrea knowledgeevolutioninphysicsresearchananalysisofbibliographiccouplingnetworks AT cheongsiewann knowledgeevolutioninphysicsresearchananalysisofbibliographiccouplingnetworks |