Cargando…

Readability and Suitability of COPD Consumer Information

BACKGROUND: Information leaflets have been shown to positively or negatively impact adherence, depending on their content. The objective of this study was to perform an appraisal of the consumer information provided in COPD inhaler monographs. METHODS: COPD inhalers were identified from the Health C...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fullmann, Kathryn, Blackburn, David F., Fenton, Mark E., Mansell, Holly
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5602649/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28947874
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/2945282
_version_ 1783264597755559936
author Fullmann, Kathryn
Blackburn, David F.
Fenton, Mark E.
Mansell, Holly
author_facet Fullmann, Kathryn
Blackburn, David F.
Fenton, Mark E.
Mansell, Holly
author_sort Fullmann, Kathryn
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Information leaflets have been shown to positively or negatively impact adherence, depending on their content. The objective of this study was to perform an appraisal of the consumer information provided in COPD inhaler monographs. METHODS: COPD inhalers were identified from the Health Canada Drug Product Database. Medication information and instructions for inhaler use were analyzed for readability by seven formulas, with an acceptability threshold of grades 6–8. Three researchers rated suitability using a modified Suitability Assessment of Materials (SAM) tool and assessed leaflets for explicit warnings. RESULTS: Twenty-six inhalers with a COPD indication were evaluated. Medication information sections were rated as “difficult to read” or “hard,” and 85% (22/26) had a reading level above grade 8. The instructions for inhaler use were rated as “easy” or “fairly easy” to read and 63% (16/26) met the threshold by all formulas. While all leaflets achieved superior suitability ratings, extreme warnings included risk of premature death (n = 12), risks of serious injury (n = 26), serious interactions (n = 26), and statements that convey a serious consequence to therapy (n = 26). CONCLUSION: While COPD information leaflets in Canada performed well in terms of readability and suitability, overemphasis on side effects, warnings, and precautions may contribute to patient fear and nonadherence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5602649
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56026492017-09-25 Readability and Suitability of COPD Consumer Information Fullmann, Kathryn Blackburn, David F. Fenton, Mark E. Mansell, Holly Can Respir J Research Article BACKGROUND: Information leaflets have been shown to positively or negatively impact adherence, depending on their content. The objective of this study was to perform an appraisal of the consumer information provided in COPD inhaler monographs. METHODS: COPD inhalers were identified from the Health Canada Drug Product Database. Medication information and instructions for inhaler use were analyzed for readability by seven formulas, with an acceptability threshold of grades 6–8. Three researchers rated suitability using a modified Suitability Assessment of Materials (SAM) tool and assessed leaflets for explicit warnings. RESULTS: Twenty-six inhalers with a COPD indication were evaluated. Medication information sections were rated as “difficult to read” or “hard,” and 85% (22/26) had a reading level above grade 8. The instructions for inhaler use were rated as “easy” or “fairly easy” to read and 63% (16/26) met the threshold by all formulas. While all leaflets achieved superior suitability ratings, extreme warnings included risk of premature death (n = 12), risks of serious injury (n = 26), serious interactions (n = 26), and statements that convey a serious consequence to therapy (n = 26). CONCLUSION: While COPD information leaflets in Canada performed well in terms of readability and suitability, overemphasis on side effects, warnings, and precautions may contribute to patient fear and nonadherence. Hindawi 2017 2017-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5602649/ /pubmed/28947874 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/2945282 Text en Copyright © 2017 Kathryn Fullmann et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Fullmann, Kathryn
Blackburn, David F.
Fenton, Mark E.
Mansell, Holly
Readability and Suitability of COPD Consumer Information
title Readability and Suitability of COPD Consumer Information
title_full Readability and Suitability of COPD Consumer Information
title_fullStr Readability and Suitability of COPD Consumer Information
title_full_unstemmed Readability and Suitability of COPD Consumer Information
title_short Readability and Suitability of COPD Consumer Information
title_sort readability and suitability of copd consumer information
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5602649/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28947874
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/2945282
work_keys_str_mv AT fullmannkathryn readabilityandsuitabilityofcopdconsumerinformation
AT blackburndavidf readabilityandsuitabilityofcopdconsumerinformation
AT fentonmarke readabilityandsuitabilityofcopdconsumerinformation
AT mansellholly readabilityandsuitabilityofcopdconsumerinformation