Cargando…

Hysteroscopic Morcellation of Submucous Myomas: A Systematic Review

Hysteroscopic surgery is the actual gold standard treatment for several types of intrauterine pathologies, including submucous myomas (SMs). To date, the availability of Hysteroscopic Tissue Removal systems (HTRs) opened a new scenario. Based on these elements, the aim of this article is to review t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vitale, Salvatore Giovanni, Sapia, Fabrizio, Rapisarda, Agnese Maria Chiara, Valenti, Gaetano, Santangelo, Fabrizia, Rossetti, Diego, Chiofalo, Benito, Sarpietro, Giuseppe, La Rosa, Valentina Lucia, Triolo, Onofrio, Noventa, Marco, Gizzo, Salvatore, Laganà, Antonio Simone
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5602656/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28948169
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/6848250
_version_ 1783264599409164288
author Vitale, Salvatore Giovanni
Sapia, Fabrizio
Rapisarda, Agnese Maria Chiara
Valenti, Gaetano
Santangelo, Fabrizia
Rossetti, Diego
Chiofalo, Benito
Sarpietro, Giuseppe
La Rosa, Valentina Lucia
Triolo, Onofrio
Noventa, Marco
Gizzo, Salvatore
Laganà, Antonio Simone
author_facet Vitale, Salvatore Giovanni
Sapia, Fabrizio
Rapisarda, Agnese Maria Chiara
Valenti, Gaetano
Santangelo, Fabrizia
Rossetti, Diego
Chiofalo, Benito
Sarpietro, Giuseppe
La Rosa, Valentina Lucia
Triolo, Onofrio
Noventa, Marco
Gizzo, Salvatore
Laganà, Antonio Simone
author_sort Vitale, Salvatore Giovanni
collection PubMed
description Hysteroscopic surgery is the actual gold standard treatment for several types of intrauterine pathologies, including submucous myomas (SMs). To date, the availability of Hysteroscopic Tissue Removal systems (HTRs) opened a new scenario. Based on these elements, the aim of this article is to review the available evidence about HTRs for the management of SMs. We included 8 papers (3 prospective studies and 5 retrospective studies). A total of 283 women underwent intrauterine morcellation of SM: 208 were treated using MyoSure and 75 using Truclear 8.0. Only 3 articles reported data about procedures performed in outpatient/office setting. Only half of the included studies included type 2 SMs. HTRs significantly reduced operative time compared to traditional resectoscopy in some studies, whereas others did not find significant differences. Despite the availability of few randomized controlled trials and the cost of the instrument, according to our systematic review, the use of HTRs seems to be a feasible surgical option in terms of operative time and complications. Nevertheless, the type of SM still remains the biggest challenge: type 0 and 1 SMs are easier to manage with respect to type 2, reflecting what already is known for the “classic” hysteroscopic myomectomy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5602656
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56026562017-09-25 Hysteroscopic Morcellation of Submucous Myomas: A Systematic Review Vitale, Salvatore Giovanni Sapia, Fabrizio Rapisarda, Agnese Maria Chiara Valenti, Gaetano Santangelo, Fabrizia Rossetti, Diego Chiofalo, Benito Sarpietro, Giuseppe La Rosa, Valentina Lucia Triolo, Onofrio Noventa, Marco Gizzo, Salvatore Laganà, Antonio Simone Biomed Res Int Review Article Hysteroscopic surgery is the actual gold standard treatment for several types of intrauterine pathologies, including submucous myomas (SMs). To date, the availability of Hysteroscopic Tissue Removal systems (HTRs) opened a new scenario. Based on these elements, the aim of this article is to review the available evidence about HTRs for the management of SMs. We included 8 papers (3 prospective studies and 5 retrospective studies). A total of 283 women underwent intrauterine morcellation of SM: 208 were treated using MyoSure and 75 using Truclear 8.0. Only 3 articles reported data about procedures performed in outpatient/office setting. Only half of the included studies included type 2 SMs. HTRs significantly reduced operative time compared to traditional resectoscopy in some studies, whereas others did not find significant differences. Despite the availability of few randomized controlled trials and the cost of the instrument, according to our systematic review, the use of HTRs seems to be a feasible surgical option in terms of operative time and complications. Nevertheless, the type of SM still remains the biggest challenge: type 0 and 1 SMs are easier to manage with respect to type 2, reflecting what already is known for the “classic” hysteroscopic myomectomy. Hindawi 2017 2017-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5602656/ /pubmed/28948169 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/6848250 Text en Copyright © 2017 Salvatore Giovanni Vitale et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Vitale, Salvatore Giovanni
Sapia, Fabrizio
Rapisarda, Agnese Maria Chiara
Valenti, Gaetano
Santangelo, Fabrizia
Rossetti, Diego
Chiofalo, Benito
Sarpietro, Giuseppe
La Rosa, Valentina Lucia
Triolo, Onofrio
Noventa, Marco
Gizzo, Salvatore
Laganà, Antonio Simone
Hysteroscopic Morcellation of Submucous Myomas: A Systematic Review
title Hysteroscopic Morcellation of Submucous Myomas: A Systematic Review
title_full Hysteroscopic Morcellation of Submucous Myomas: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Hysteroscopic Morcellation of Submucous Myomas: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Hysteroscopic Morcellation of Submucous Myomas: A Systematic Review
title_short Hysteroscopic Morcellation of Submucous Myomas: A Systematic Review
title_sort hysteroscopic morcellation of submucous myomas: a systematic review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5602656/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28948169
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/6848250
work_keys_str_mv AT vitalesalvatoregiovanni hysteroscopicmorcellationofsubmucousmyomasasystematicreview
AT sapiafabrizio hysteroscopicmorcellationofsubmucousmyomasasystematicreview
AT rapisardaagnesemariachiara hysteroscopicmorcellationofsubmucousmyomasasystematicreview
AT valentigaetano hysteroscopicmorcellationofsubmucousmyomasasystematicreview
AT santangelofabrizia hysteroscopicmorcellationofsubmucousmyomasasystematicreview
AT rossettidiego hysteroscopicmorcellationofsubmucousmyomasasystematicreview
AT chiofalobenito hysteroscopicmorcellationofsubmucousmyomasasystematicreview
AT sarpietrogiuseppe hysteroscopicmorcellationofsubmucousmyomasasystematicreview
AT larosavalentinalucia hysteroscopicmorcellationofsubmucousmyomasasystematicreview
AT trioloonofrio hysteroscopicmorcellationofsubmucousmyomasasystematicreview
AT noventamarco hysteroscopicmorcellationofsubmucousmyomasasystematicreview
AT gizzosalvatore hysteroscopicmorcellationofsubmucousmyomasasystematicreview
AT laganaantoniosimone hysteroscopicmorcellationofsubmucousmyomasasystematicreview