Cargando…
The ML-EM Algorithm is Not Optimal for Poisson Noise
The ML-EM (maximum likelihood expectation maximization) algorithm is the most popular image reconstruction method when the measurement noise is Poisson distributed. This short paper considers the problem that for a given noisy projection data set, whether the ML-EM algorithm is able to provide an ap...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5603291/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28935996 |
_version_ | 1783264693640495104 |
---|---|
author | Zeng, Gengsheng L. |
author_facet | Zeng, Gengsheng L. |
author_sort | Zeng, Gengsheng L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The ML-EM (maximum likelihood expectation maximization) algorithm is the most popular image reconstruction method when the measurement noise is Poisson distributed. This short paper considers the problem that for a given noisy projection data set, whether the ML-EM algorithm is able to provide an approximate solution that is close to the true solution. It is well-known that the ML-EM algorithm at early iterations converges towards the true solution and then in later iterations diverges away from the true solution. Therefore a potential good approximate solution can only be obtained by early termination. This short paper argues that the ML-EM algorithm is not optimal in providing such an approximate solution. In order to show that the ML-EM algorithm is not optimal, it is only necessary to provide a different algorithm that performs better. An alternative algorithm is suggested in this paper and this alternative algorithm is able to outperform the ML-EM algorithm. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5603291 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56032912017-09-19 The ML-EM Algorithm is Not Optimal for Poisson Noise Zeng, Gengsheng L. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci Article The ML-EM (maximum likelihood expectation maximization) algorithm is the most popular image reconstruction method when the measurement noise is Poisson distributed. This short paper considers the problem that for a given noisy projection data set, whether the ML-EM algorithm is able to provide an approximate solution that is close to the true solution. It is well-known that the ML-EM algorithm at early iterations converges towards the true solution and then in later iterations diverges away from the true solution. Therefore a potential good approximate solution can only be obtained by early termination. This short paper argues that the ML-EM algorithm is not optimal in providing such an approximate solution. In order to show that the ML-EM algorithm is not optimal, it is only necessary to provide a different algorithm that performs better. An alternative algorithm is suggested in this paper and this alternative algorithm is able to outperform the ML-EM algorithm. 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC5603291/ /pubmed/28935996 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission. |
spellingShingle | Article Zeng, Gengsheng L. The ML-EM Algorithm is Not Optimal for Poisson Noise |
title | The ML-EM Algorithm is Not Optimal for Poisson Noise |
title_full | The ML-EM Algorithm is Not Optimal for Poisson Noise |
title_fullStr | The ML-EM Algorithm is Not Optimal for Poisson Noise |
title_full_unstemmed | The ML-EM Algorithm is Not Optimal for Poisson Noise |
title_short | The ML-EM Algorithm is Not Optimal for Poisson Noise |
title_sort | ml-em algorithm is not optimal for poisson noise |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5603291/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28935996 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zenggengshengl themlemalgorithmisnotoptimalforpoissonnoise AT zenggengshengl mlemalgorithmisnotoptimalforpoissonnoise |