Cargando…

Guidelines for quality control of PET/CT scans in a multicenter clinical study

To date, there is no published detailed checklist with parameters referencing the DICOM tag information with respect to the quality control (QC) of PET/CT scans. The aims of these guidelines are to provide the know-how for effectively controlling the quality of PET/CT scans in multicenter studies, t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hristova, Ivalina, Boellaard, Ronald, Galette, Paul, Shankar, Lalitha K., Liu, Yan, Stroobants, Sigrid, Hoekstra, Otto S., Oyen, Wim J.G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5603471/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28924696
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40658-017-0190-7
_version_ 1783264703668027392
author Hristova, Ivalina
Boellaard, Ronald
Galette, Paul
Shankar, Lalitha K.
Liu, Yan
Stroobants, Sigrid
Hoekstra, Otto S.
Oyen, Wim J.G.
author_facet Hristova, Ivalina
Boellaard, Ronald
Galette, Paul
Shankar, Lalitha K.
Liu, Yan
Stroobants, Sigrid
Hoekstra, Otto S.
Oyen, Wim J.G.
author_sort Hristova, Ivalina
collection PubMed
description To date, there is no published detailed checklist with parameters referencing the DICOM tag information with respect to the quality control (QC) of PET/CT scans. The aims of these guidelines are to provide the know-how for effectively controlling the quality of PET/CT scans in multicenter studies, to standardize the QC, to give sponsors and regulatory agencies a basis for justification of the data quality when using standardized uptake values as an imaging biomarker, to document the compliance with the imaging guidelines, to verify the per protocol population versus intent to treat population, and to safeguard the validity of multicenter study conclusions employing standardized uptake value (SUV) as an imaging biomarker which is paramount to the scientific community. Following the proposed guidelines will ensure standardized prospective imaging QC of scans applicable to most studies where SUVs are used as an imaging biomarker. The multitude of factors affecting SUV measurements when not controlled inflicts noise on the data. Decisions on patient management with substantial noise would be devastating to patients, ultimately undermine treatment outcome, and invalidate the utility of SUV as an imaging biomarker usefulness. Strict control of the data quality used for the validation of SUV as an imaging biomarker would ensure trust and reliability of the data.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5603471
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56034712017-09-27 Guidelines for quality control of PET/CT scans in a multicenter clinical study Hristova, Ivalina Boellaard, Ronald Galette, Paul Shankar, Lalitha K. Liu, Yan Stroobants, Sigrid Hoekstra, Otto S. Oyen, Wim J.G. EJNMMI Phys Opinion Article To date, there is no published detailed checklist with parameters referencing the DICOM tag information with respect to the quality control (QC) of PET/CT scans. The aims of these guidelines are to provide the know-how for effectively controlling the quality of PET/CT scans in multicenter studies, to standardize the QC, to give sponsors and regulatory agencies a basis for justification of the data quality when using standardized uptake values as an imaging biomarker, to document the compliance with the imaging guidelines, to verify the per protocol population versus intent to treat population, and to safeguard the validity of multicenter study conclusions employing standardized uptake value (SUV) as an imaging biomarker which is paramount to the scientific community. Following the proposed guidelines will ensure standardized prospective imaging QC of scans applicable to most studies where SUVs are used as an imaging biomarker. The multitude of factors affecting SUV measurements when not controlled inflicts noise on the data. Decisions on patient management with substantial noise would be devastating to patients, ultimately undermine treatment outcome, and invalidate the utility of SUV as an imaging biomarker usefulness. Strict control of the data quality used for the validation of SUV as an imaging biomarker would ensure trust and reliability of the data. Springer International Publishing 2017-09-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5603471/ /pubmed/28924696 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40658-017-0190-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Opinion Article
Hristova, Ivalina
Boellaard, Ronald
Galette, Paul
Shankar, Lalitha K.
Liu, Yan
Stroobants, Sigrid
Hoekstra, Otto S.
Oyen, Wim J.G.
Guidelines for quality control of PET/CT scans in a multicenter clinical study
title Guidelines for quality control of PET/CT scans in a multicenter clinical study
title_full Guidelines for quality control of PET/CT scans in a multicenter clinical study
title_fullStr Guidelines for quality control of PET/CT scans in a multicenter clinical study
title_full_unstemmed Guidelines for quality control of PET/CT scans in a multicenter clinical study
title_short Guidelines for quality control of PET/CT scans in a multicenter clinical study
title_sort guidelines for quality control of pet/ct scans in a multicenter clinical study
topic Opinion Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5603471/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28924696
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40658-017-0190-7
work_keys_str_mv AT hristovaivalina guidelinesforqualitycontrolofpetctscansinamulticenterclinicalstudy
AT boellaardronald guidelinesforqualitycontrolofpetctscansinamulticenterclinicalstudy
AT galettepaul guidelinesforqualitycontrolofpetctscansinamulticenterclinicalstudy
AT shankarlalithak guidelinesforqualitycontrolofpetctscansinamulticenterclinicalstudy
AT liuyan guidelinesforqualitycontrolofpetctscansinamulticenterclinicalstudy
AT stroobantssigrid guidelinesforqualitycontrolofpetctscansinamulticenterclinicalstudy
AT hoekstraottos guidelinesforqualitycontrolofpetctscansinamulticenterclinicalstudy
AT oyenwimjg guidelinesforqualitycontrolofpetctscansinamulticenterclinicalstudy