Cargando…

Contralateral routing of signals disrupts monaural level and spectral cues to sound localisation on the horizontal plane

OBJECTIVES: Contra-lateral routing of signals (CROS) devices re-route sound between the deaf and hearing ears of unilaterally-deaf individuals. This rerouting would be expected to disrupt access to monaural level cues that can support monaural localisation in the horizontal plane. However, such a de...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pedley, Adam J., Kitterick, Pádraig T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier/North-Holland Biomedical Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5603973/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28666702
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2017.06.007
_version_ 1783264796105244672
author Pedley, Adam J.
Kitterick, Pádraig T.
author_facet Pedley, Adam J.
Kitterick, Pádraig T.
author_sort Pedley, Adam J.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Contra-lateral routing of signals (CROS) devices re-route sound between the deaf and hearing ears of unilaterally-deaf individuals. This rerouting would be expected to disrupt access to monaural level cues that can support monaural localisation in the horizontal plane. However, such a detrimental effect has not been confirmed by clinical studies of CROS use. The present study aimed to exercise strict experimental control over the availability of monaural cues to localisation in the horizontal plane and the fitting of the CROS device to assess whether signal routing can impair the ability to locate sources of sound and, if so, whether CROS selectively disrupts monaural level or spectral cues to horizontal location, or both. DESIGN: Unilateral deafness and CROS device use were simulated in twelve normal hearing participants. Monaural recordings of broadband white noise presented from three spatial locations (−60°, 0°, and +60°) were made in the ear canal of a model listener using a probe microphone with and without a CROS device. The recordings were presented to participants via an insert earphone placed in their right ear. The recordings were processed to disrupt either monaural level or spectral cues to horizontal sound location by roving presentation level or the energy across adjacent frequency bands, respectively. Localisation ability was assessed using a three-alternative forced-choice spatial discrimination task. RESULTS: Participants localised above chance levels in all conditions. Spatial discrimination accuracy was poorer when participants only had access to monaural spectral cues compared to when monaural level cues were available. CROS use impaired localisation significantly regardless of whether level or spectral cues were available. For both cues, signal re-routing had a detrimental effect on the ability to localise sounds originating from the side of the deaf ear (−60°). CROS use also impaired the ability to use level cues to localise sounds originating from straight ahead (0°). CONCLUSIONS: The re-routing of sounds can restrict access to the monaural cues that provide a basis for determining sound location in the horizontal plane. Perhaps encouragingly, the results suggest that both monaural level and spectral cues may not be disrupted entirely by signal re-routing and that it may still be possible to reliably identify sounds originating on the hearing side.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5603973
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Elsevier/North-Holland Biomedical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56039732017-10-12 Contralateral routing of signals disrupts monaural level and spectral cues to sound localisation on the horizontal plane Pedley, Adam J. Kitterick, Pádraig T. Hear Res Research Paper OBJECTIVES: Contra-lateral routing of signals (CROS) devices re-route sound between the deaf and hearing ears of unilaterally-deaf individuals. This rerouting would be expected to disrupt access to monaural level cues that can support monaural localisation in the horizontal plane. However, such a detrimental effect has not been confirmed by clinical studies of CROS use. The present study aimed to exercise strict experimental control over the availability of monaural cues to localisation in the horizontal plane and the fitting of the CROS device to assess whether signal routing can impair the ability to locate sources of sound and, if so, whether CROS selectively disrupts monaural level or spectral cues to horizontal location, or both. DESIGN: Unilateral deafness and CROS device use were simulated in twelve normal hearing participants. Monaural recordings of broadband white noise presented from three spatial locations (−60°, 0°, and +60°) were made in the ear canal of a model listener using a probe microphone with and without a CROS device. The recordings were presented to participants via an insert earphone placed in their right ear. The recordings were processed to disrupt either monaural level or spectral cues to horizontal sound location by roving presentation level or the energy across adjacent frequency bands, respectively. Localisation ability was assessed using a three-alternative forced-choice spatial discrimination task. RESULTS: Participants localised above chance levels in all conditions. Spatial discrimination accuracy was poorer when participants only had access to monaural spectral cues compared to when monaural level cues were available. CROS use impaired localisation significantly regardless of whether level or spectral cues were available. For both cues, signal re-routing had a detrimental effect on the ability to localise sounds originating from the side of the deaf ear (−60°). CROS use also impaired the ability to use level cues to localise sounds originating from straight ahead (0°). CONCLUSIONS: The re-routing of sounds can restrict access to the monaural cues that provide a basis for determining sound location in the horizontal plane. Perhaps encouragingly, the results suggest that both monaural level and spectral cues may not be disrupted entirely by signal re-routing and that it may still be possible to reliably identify sounds originating on the hearing side. Elsevier/North-Holland Biomedical Press 2017-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5603973/ /pubmed/28666702 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2017.06.007 Text en © 2017 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Paper
Pedley, Adam J.
Kitterick, Pádraig T.
Contralateral routing of signals disrupts monaural level and spectral cues to sound localisation on the horizontal plane
title Contralateral routing of signals disrupts monaural level and spectral cues to sound localisation on the horizontal plane
title_full Contralateral routing of signals disrupts monaural level and spectral cues to sound localisation on the horizontal plane
title_fullStr Contralateral routing of signals disrupts monaural level and spectral cues to sound localisation on the horizontal plane
title_full_unstemmed Contralateral routing of signals disrupts monaural level and spectral cues to sound localisation on the horizontal plane
title_short Contralateral routing of signals disrupts monaural level and spectral cues to sound localisation on the horizontal plane
title_sort contralateral routing of signals disrupts monaural level and spectral cues to sound localisation on the horizontal plane
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5603973/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28666702
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2017.06.007
work_keys_str_mv AT pedleyadamj contralateralroutingofsignalsdisruptsmonaurallevelandspectralcuestosoundlocalisationonthehorizontalplane
AT kitterickpadraigt contralateralroutingofsignalsdisruptsmonaurallevelandspectralcuestosoundlocalisationonthehorizontalplane