Cargando…

Fragrances Categorized According to Relative Human Skin Sensitization Potency

BACKGROUND: The development of non-animal alternatives for skin sensitization potency prediction is dependent upon the availability of a sufficient dataset whose human potency is well characterized. Previously, establishment of basic categorization criteria for 6 defined potency categories, allowed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Api, Anne Marie, Parakhia, Rahul, O'Brien, Devin, Basketter, David A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5603977/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28691948
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/DER.0000000000000304
_version_ 1783264797025894400
author Api, Anne Marie
Parakhia, Rahul
O'Brien, Devin
Basketter, David A.
author_facet Api, Anne Marie
Parakhia, Rahul
O'Brien, Devin
Basketter, David A.
author_sort Api, Anne Marie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The development of non-animal alternatives for skin sensitization potency prediction is dependent upon the availability of a sufficient dataset whose human potency is well characterized. Previously, establishment of basic categorization criteria for 6 defined potency categories, allowed 131 substances to be allocated into them entirely on the basis of human information. OBJECTIVES: To supplement the original dataset with an extended range of fragrance substances. METHODS: A more fully described version of the original criteria was used to assess 89 fragrance chemicals, allowing their allocation into one of the 6 potency categories. RESULTS: None of the fragrance substances were assigned to the most potent group, category 1, whereas 11 were category 2, 22 were category 3, 37 were category 4, and 19 were category 5. Although none were identified as non-sensitizing, note that substances in category 5 also do not pass the threshold for regulatory classification. CONCLUSIONS: The combined datasets of >200 substances placed into potency categories solely on the basis of human data provides an essential resource for the elaboration and evaluation of predictive non-animal methods.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5603977
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56039772017-10-11 Fragrances Categorized According to Relative Human Skin Sensitization Potency Api, Anne Marie Parakhia, Rahul O'Brien, Devin Basketter, David A. Dermatitis Studies BACKGROUND: The development of non-animal alternatives for skin sensitization potency prediction is dependent upon the availability of a sufficient dataset whose human potency is well characterized. Previously, establishment of basic categorization criteria for 6 defined potency categories, allowed 131 substances to be allocated into them entirely on the basis of human information. OBJECTIVES: To supplement the original dataset with an extended range of fragrance substances. METHODS: A more fully described version of the original criteria was used to assess 89 fragrance chemicals, allowing their allocation into one of the 6 potency categories. RESULTS: None of the fragrance substances were assigned to the most potent group, category 1, whereas 11 were category 2, 22 were category 3, 37 were category 4, and 19 were category 5. Although none were identified as non-sensitizing, note that substances in category 5 also do not pass the threshold for regulatory classification. CONCLUSIONS: The combined datasets of >200 substances placed into potency categories solely on the basis of human data provides an essential resource for the elaboration and evaluation of predictive non-animal methods. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2017-09 2017-07-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5603977/ /pubmed/28691948 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/DER.0000000000000304 Text en © 2017 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Contact Dermatitis Society. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Studies
Api, Anne Marie
Parakhia, Rahul
O'Brien, Devin
Basketter, David A.
Fragrances Categorized According to Relative Human Skin Sensitization Potency
title Fragrances Categorized According to Relative Human Skin Sensitization Potency
title_full Fragrances Categorized According to Relative Human Skin Sensitization Potency
title_fullStr Fragrances Categorized According to Relative Human Skin Sensitization Potency
title_full_unstemmed Fragrances Categorized According to Relative Human Skin Sensitization Potency
title_short Fragrances Categorized According to Relative Human Skin Sensitization Potency
title_sort fragrances categorized according to relative human skin sensitization potency
topic Studies
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5603977/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28691948
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/DER.0000000000000304
work_keys_str_mv AT apiannemarie fragrancescategorizedaccordingtorelativehumanskinsensitizationpotency
AT parakhiarahul fragrancescategorizedaccordingtorelativehumanskinsensitizationpotency
AT obriendevin fragrancescategorizedaccordingtorelativehumanskinsensitizationpotency
AT basketterdavida fragrancescategorizedaccordingtorelativehumanskinsensitizationpotency