Cargando…
The risk of venous thromboembolism associated with peripherally inserted central catheters in ambulant cancer patients
BACKGROUND: Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a common complication of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs). PICCs are increasingly utilised in the management of cancer patients, a group which carries both additional risks for vascular thromboembolism as well as for complex morbidity. We anal...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5604407/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28936124 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12959-017-0148-y |
_version_ | 1783264860690186240 |
---|---|
author | Jones, Daniel Wismayer, Kurt Bozas, George Palmer, June Elliott, Mandi Maraveyas, Anthony |
author_facet | Jones, Daniel Wismayer, Kurt Bozas, George Palmer, June Elliott, Mandi Maraveyas, Anthony |
author_sort | Jones, Daniel |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a common complication of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs). PICCs are increasingly utilised in the management of cancer patients, a group which carries both additional risks for vascular thromboembolism as well as for complex morbidity. We analysed a cohort of cancer patients subjected to PICC insertion in a single cancer centre for the incidence of all-type vascular thromboembolism (VTE) and investigated relative risk factors. METHODS: In this clinical audit, the records of patients referred for PICC insertion in our centre in the period between 1/1/2011 and 1/4/2014 were retrospectively reviewed. The primary outcomes investigated were a) PICC-related deep vein thrombosis (PRDVT) and b) distant VTE (lower limb DVT and pulmonary embolism). 4Fr single lumen PICCs were placed in all patients. The Kaplan Meier method was used to study time from PICC insertion to PRDVT/VTE. Survival curves were compared using the log rank method. Logistic and Cox regression analyses were used to assess local, distant and combined endpoints. RESULTS: Four hundred ninety patients were included in the analysis of which 27 (5.5%) developed a PRDVT. Statistically significant risk factors for developing PRDVT in multivariate analysis included more than one attempt for insertion (OR 2.61, 95%CI: 1.12–6.05) and the use of fluoropyrimidine containing chemotherapy (OR 4.27, 95%CI 1.3–14.07). Twenty-six patients developed a distant VTE. Male gender was the only significant risk factor for distant VTE. When all-type VTE were considered together fluoropyrimidine containing chemotherapy (OR 4.54, 95% CI 1.63–12.61), male gender (OR 2.03, 95% CI 1.04–3.93) and white cell count (OR 1.12, 95% CI 1.00–1.26) were statistically significant as risk factors in this analysis. CONCLUSIONS: This is a large study of VTE following PICC insertion in cancer patients which also looks at the rate of distant VTE. The observed PRDVT incidence is comparable with available literature. Fluoropyrimidine containing chemotherapy and more than one attempt for PICC insertion were independent predictors of PICC-associated VTE whilst the former remained an independent predictor of all-type VTE. Anticoagulation did not prevent thrombotic events in this cohort. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5604407 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56044072017-09-21 The risk of venous thromboembolism associated with peripherally inserted central catheters in ambulant cancer patients Jones, Daniel Wismayer, Kurt Bozas, George Palmer, June Elliott, Mandi Maraveyas, Anthony Thromb J Research BACKGROUND: Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a common complication of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs). PICCs are increasingly utilised in the management of cancer patients, a group which carries both additional risks for vascular thromboembolism as well as for complex morbidity. We analysed a cohort of cancer patients subjected to PICC insertion in a single cancer centre for the incidence of all-type vascular thromboembolism (VTE) and investigated relative risk factors. METHODS: In this clinical audit, the records of patients referred for PICC insertion in our centre in the period between 1/1/2011 and 1/4/2014 were retrospectively reviewed. The primary outcomes investigated were a) PICC-related deep vein thrombosis (PRDVT) and b) distant VTE (lower limb DVT and pulmonary embolism). 4Fr single lumen PICCs were placed in all patients. The Kaplan Meier method was used to study time from PICC insertion to PRDVT/VTE. Survival curves were compared using the log rank method. Logistic and Cox regression analyses were used to assess local, distant and combined endpoints. RESULTS: Four hundred ninety patients were included in the analysis of which 27 (5.5%) developed a PRDVT. Statistically significant risk factors for developing PRDVT in multivariate analysis included more than one attempt for insertion (OR 2.61, 95%CI: 1.12–6.05) and the use of fluoropyrimidine containing chemotherapy (OR 4.27, 95%CI 1.3–14.07). Twenty-six patients developed a distant VTE. Male gender was the only significant risk factor for distant VTE. When all-type VTE were considered together fluoropyrimidine containing chemotherapy (OR 4.54, 95% CI 1.63–12.61), male gender (OR 2.03, 95% CI 1.04–3.93) and white cell count (OR 1.12, 95% CI 1.00–1.26) were statistically significant as risk factors in this analysis. CONCLUSIONS: This is a large study of VTE following PICC insertion in cancer patients which also looks at the rate of distant VTE. The observed PRDVT incidence is comparable with available literature. Fluoropyrimidine containing chemotherapy and more than one attempt for PICC insertion were independent predictors of PICC-associated VTE whilst the former remained an independent predictor of all-type VTE. Anticoagulation did not prevent thrombotic events in this cohort. BioMed Central 2017-09-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5604407/ /pubmed/28936124 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12959-017-0148-y Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Jones, Daniel Wismayer, Kurt Bozas, George Palmer, June Elliott, Mandi Maraveyas, Anthony The risk of venous thromboembolism associated with peripherally inserted central catheters in ambulant cancer patients |
title | The risk of venous thromboembolism associated with peripherally inserted central catheters in ambulant cancer patients |
title_full | The risk of venous thromboembolism associated with peripherally inserted central catheters in ambulant cancer patients |
title_fullStr | The risk of venous thromboembolism associated with peripherally inserted central catheters in ambulant cancer patients |
title_full_unstemmed | The risk of venous thromboembolism associated with peripherally inserted central catheters in ambulant cancer patients |
title_short | The risk of venous thromboembolism associated with peripherally inserted central catheters in ambulant cancer patients |
title_sort | risk of venous thromboembolism associated with peripherally inserted central catheters in ambulant cancer patients |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5604407/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28936124 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12959-017-0148-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jonesdaniel theriskofvenousthromboembolismassociatedwithperipherallyinsertedcentralcathetersinambulantcancerpatients AT wismayerkurt theriskofvenousthromboembolismassociatedwithperipherallyinsertedcentralcathetersinambulantcancerpatients AT bozasgeorge theriskofvenousthromboembolismassociatedwithperipherallyinsertedcentralcathetersinambulantcancerpatients AT palmerjune theriskofvenousthromboembolismassociatedwithperipherallyinsertedcentralcathetersinambulantcancerpatients AT elliottmandi theriskofvenousthromboembolismassociatedwithperipherallyinsertedcentralcathetersinambulantcancerpatients AT maraveyasanthony theriskofvenousthromboembolismassociatedwithperipherallyinsertedcentralcathetersinambulantcancerpatients AT jonesdaniel riskofvenousthromboembolismassociatedwithperipherallyinsertedcentralcathetersinambulantcancerpatients AT wismayerkurt riskofvenousthromboembolismassociatedwithperipherallyinsertedcentralcathetersinambulantcancerpatients AT bozasgeorge riskofvenousthromboembolismassociatedwithperipherallyinsertedcentralcathetersinambulantcancerpatients AT palmerjune riskofvenousthromboembolismassociatedwithperipherallyinsertedcentralcathetersinambulantcancerpatients AT elliottmandi riskofvenousthromboembolismassociatedwithperipherallyinsertedcentralcathetersinambulantcancerpatients AT maraveyasanthony riskofvenousthromboembolismassociatedwithperipherallyinsertedcentralcathetersinambulantcancerpatients |