Cargando…

The risk of venous thromboembolism associated with peripherally inserted central catheters in ambulant cancer patients

BACKGROUND: Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a common complication of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs). PICCs are increasingly utilised in the management of cancer patients, a group which carries both additional risks for vascular thromboembolism as well as for complex morbidity. We anal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jones, Daniel, Wismayer, Kurt, Bozas, George, Palmer, June, Elliott, Mandi, Maraveyas, Anthony
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5604407/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28936124
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12959-017-0148-y
_version_ 1783264860690186240
author Jones, Daniel
Wismayer, Kurt
Bozas, George
Palmer, June
Elliott, Mandi
Maraveyas, Anthony
author_facet Jones, Daniel
Wismayer, Kurt
Bozas, George
Palmer, June
Elliott, Mandi
Maraveyas, Anthony
author_sort Jones, Daniel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a common complication of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs). PICCs are increasingly utilised in the management of cancer patients, a group which carries both additional risks for vascular thromboembolism as well as for complex morbidity. We analysed a cohort of cancer patients subjected to PICC insertion in a single cancer centre for the incidence of all-type vascular thromboembolism (VTE) and investigated relative risk factors. METHODS: In this clinical audit, the records of patients referred for PICC insertion in our centre in the period between 1/1/2011 and 1/4/2014 were retrospectively reviewed. The primary outcomes investigated were a) PICC-related deep vein thrombosis (PRDVT) and b) distant VTE (lower limb DVT and pulmonary embolism). 4Fr single lumen PICCs were placed in all patients. The Kaplan Meier method was used to study time from PICC insertion to PRDVT/VTE. Survival curves were compared using the log rank method. Logistic and Cox regression analyses were used to assess local, distant and combined endpoints. RESULTS: Four hundred ninety patients were included in the analysis of which 27 (5.5%) developed a PRDVT. Statistically significant risk factors for developing PRDVT in multivariate analysis included more than one attempt for insertion (OR 2.61, 95%CI: 1.12–6.05) and the use of fluoropyrimidine containing chemotherapy (OR 4.27, 95%CI 1.3–14.07). Twenty-six patients developed a distant VTE. Male gender was the only significant risk factor for distant VTE. When all-type VTE were considered together fluoropyrimidine containing chemotherapy (OR 4.54, 95% CI 1.63–12.61), male gender (OR 2.03, 95% CI 1.04–3.93) and white cell count (OR 1.12, 95% CI 1.00–1.26) were statistically significant as risk factors in this analysis. CONCLUSIONS: This is a large study of VTE following PICC insertion in cancer patients which also looks at the rate of distant VTE. The observed PRDVT incidence is comparable with available literature. Fluoropyrimidine containing chemotherapy and more than one attempt for PICC insertion were independent predictors of PICC-associated VTE whilst the former remained an independent predictor of all-type VTE. Anticoagulation did not prevent thrombotic events in this cohort.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5604407
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56044072017-09-21 The risk of venous thromboembolism associated with peripherally inserted central catheters in ambulant cancer patients Jones, Daniel Wismayer, Kurt Bozas, George Palmer, June Elliott, Mandi Maraveyas, Anthony Thromb J Research BACKGROUND: Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a common complication of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs). PICCs are increasingly utilised in the management of cancer patients, a group which carries both additional risks for vascular thromboembolism as well as for complex morbidity. We analysed a cohort of cancer patients subjected to PICC insertion in a single cancer centre for the incidence of all-type vascular thromboembolism (VTE) and investigated relative risk factors. METHODS: In this clinical audit, the records of patients referred for PICC insertion in our centre in the period between 1/1/2011 and 1/4/2014 were retrospectively reviewed. The primary outcomes investigated were a) PICC-related deep vein thrombosis (PRDVT) and b) distant VTE (lower limb DVT and pulmonary embolism). 4Fr single lumen PICCs were placed in all patients. The Kaplan Meier method was used to study time from PICC insertion to PRDVT/VTE. Survival curves were compared using the log rank method. Logistic and Cox regression analyses were used to assess local, distant and combined endpoints. RESULTS: Four hundred ninety patients were included in the analysis of which 27 (5.5%) developed a PRDVT. Statistically significant risk factors for developing PRDVT in multivariate analysis included more than one attempt for insertion (OR 2.61, 95%CI: 1.12–6.05) and the use of fluoropyrimidine containing chemotherapy (OR 4.27, 95%CI 1.3–14.07). Twenty-six patients developed a distant VTE. Male gender was the only significant risk factor for distant VTE. When all-type VTE were considered together fluoropyrimidine containing chemotherapy (OR 4.54, 95% CI 1.63–12.61), male gender (OR 2.03, 95% CI 1.04–3.93) and white cell count (OR 1.12, 95% CI 1.00–1.26) were statistically significant as risk factors in this analysis. CONCLUSIONS: This is a large study of VTE following PICC insertion in cancer patients which also looks at the rate of distant VTE. The observed PRDVT incidence is comparable with available literature. Fluoropyrimidine containing chemotherapy and more than one attempt for PICC insertion were independent predictors of PICC-associated VTE whilst the former remained an independent predictor of all-type VTE. Anticoagulation did not prevent thrombotic events in this cohort. BioMed Central 2017-09-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5604407/ /pubmed/28936124 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12959-017-0148-y Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Jones, Daniel
Wismayer, Kurt
Bozas, George
Palmer, June
Elliott, Mandi
Maraveyas, Anthony
The risk of venous thromboembolism associated with peripherally inserted central catheters in ambulant cancer patients
title The risk of venous thromboembolism associated with peripherally inserted central catheters in ambulant cancer patients
title_full The risk of venous thromboembolism associated with peripherally inserted central catheters in ambulant cancer patients
title_fullStr The risk of venous thromboembolism associated with peripherally inserted central catheters in ambulant cancer patients
title_full_unstemmed The risk of venous thromboembolism associated with peripherally inserted central catheters in ambulant cancer patients
title_short The risk of venous thromboembolism associated with peripherally inserted central catheters in ambulant cancer patients
title_sort risk of venous thromboembolism associated with peripherally inserted central catheters in ambulant cancer patients
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5604407/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28936124
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12959-017-0148-y
work_keys_str_mv AT jonesdaniel theriskofvenousthromboembolismassociatedwithperipherallyinsertedcentralcathetersinambulantcancerpatients
AT wismayerkurt theriskofvenousthromboembolismassociatedwithperipherallyinsertedcentralcathetersinambulantcancerpatients
AT bozasgeorge theriskofvenousthromboembolismassociatedwithperipherallyinsertedcentralcathetersinambulantcancerpatients
AT palmerjune theriskofvenousthromboembolismassociatedwithperipherallyinsertedcentralcathetersinambulantcancerpatients
AT elliottmandi theriskofvenousthromboembolismassociatedwithperipherallyinsertedcentralcathetersinambulantcancerpatients
AT maraveyasanthony theriskofvenousthromboembolismassociatedwithperipherallyinsertedcentralcathetersinambulantcancerpatients
AT jonesdaniel riskofvenousthromboembolismassociatedwithperipherallyinsertedcentralcathetersinambulantcancerpatients
AT wismayerkurt riskofvenousthromboembolismassociatedwithperipherallyinsertedcentralcathetersinambulantcancerpatients
AT bozasgeorge riskofvenousthromboembolismassociatedwithperipherallyinsertedcentralcathetersinambulantcancerpatients
AT palmerjune riskofvenousthromboembolismassociatedwithperipherallyinsertedcentralcathetersinambulantcancerpatients
AT elliottmandi riskofvenousthromboembolismassociatedwithperipherallyinsertedcentralcathetersinambulantcancerpatients
AT maraveyasanthony riskofvenousthromboembolismassociatedwithperipherallyinsertedcentralcathetersinambulantcancerpatients