Cargando…

Experimental and procedural pain responses in primary dysmenorrhea: a systematic review

Primary dysmenorrhea (PD) has been the focus of a number of experimental pain studies. Although a number of reviews exist, few have critically evaluated the existing body of research on PD and experimental and procedural pain. Data from 19 published research articles that include women with PD and r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Payne, Laura A, Rapkin, Andrea J, Seidman, Laura C, Zeltzer, Lonnie K, Tsao, Jennie CI
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5604431/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29066929
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S143512
_version_ 1783264866034778112
author Payne, Laura A
Rapkin, Andrea J
Seidman, Laura C
Zeltzer, Lonnie K
Tsao, Jennie CI
author_facet Payne, Laura A
Rapkin, Andrea J
Seidman, Laura C
Zeltzer, Lonnie K
Tsao, Jennie CI
author_sort Payne, Laura A
collection PubMed
description Primary dysmenorrhea (PD) has been the focus of a number of experimental pain studies. Although a number of reviews exist, few have critically evaluated the existing body of research on PD and experimental and procedural pain. Data from 19 published research articles that include women with PD and responses to an experimental or procedural pain stimulus (or stimuli) suggest that women with PD may have elevated pain reactivity, as compared to women without PD. This pattern appears to be true across different phases of the menstrual cycle. However, there is an abundance of conflicting findings, which may be due to significant methodological issues such as inconsistent definitions of PD, wide variation in experimental pain methodologies, and inaccurate assessment of the menstrual cycle. Future research should focus on identifying specific symptoms (i.e., pain threshold ratings) to more clearly define what constitutes PD, establish reliable and valid laboratory testing protocols, and assess the menstrual cycle with greater precision.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5604431
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56044312017-10-24 Experimental and procedural pain responses in primary dysmenorrhea: a systematic review Payne, Laura A Rapkin, Andrea J Seidman, Laura C Zeltzer, Lonnie K Tsao, Jennie CI J Pain Res Review Primary dysmenorrhea (PD) has been the focus of a number of experimental pain studies. Although a number of reviews exist, few have critically evaluated the existing body of research on PD and experimental and procedural pain. Data from 19 published research articles that include women with PD and responses to an experimental or procedural pain stimulus (or stimuli) suggest that women with PD may have elevated pain reactivity, as compared to women without PD. This pattern appears to be true across different phases of the menstrual cycle. However, there is an abundance of conflicting findings, which may be due to significant methodological issues such as inconsistent definitions of PD, wide variation in experimental pain methodologies, and inaccurate assessment of the menstrual cycle. Future research should focus on identifying specific symptoms (i.e., pain threshold ratings) to more clearly define what constitutes PD, establish reliable and valid laboratory testing protocols, and assess the menstrual cycle with greater precision. Dove Medical Press 2017-09-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5604431/ /pubmed/29066929 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S143512 Text en © 2017 Payne et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Review
Payne, Laura A
Rapkin, Andrea J
Seidman, Laura C
Zeltzer, Lonnie K
Tsao, Jennie CI
Experimental and procedural pain responses in primary dysmenorrhea: a systematic review
title Experimental and procedural pain responses in primary dysmenorrhea: a systematic review
title_full Experimental and procedural pain responses in primary dysmenorrhea: a systematic review
title_fullStr Experimental and procedural pain responses in primary dysmenorrhea: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Experimental and procedural pain responses in primary dysmenorrhea: a systematic review
title_short Experimental and procedural pain responses in primary dysmenorrhea: a systematic review
title_sort experimental and procedural pain responses in primary dysmenorrhea: a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5604431/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29066929
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S143512
work_keys_str_mv AT paynelauraa experimentalandproceduralpainresponsesinprimarydysmenorrheaasystematicreview
AT rapkinandreaj experimentalandproceduralpainresponsesinprimarydysmenorrheaasystematicreview
AT seidmanlaurac experimentalandproceduralpainresponsesinprimarydysmenorrheaasystematicreview
AT zeltzerlonniek experimentalandproceduralpainresponsesinprimarydysmenorrheaasystematicreview
AT tsaojennieci experimentalandproceduralpainresponsesinprimarydysmenorrheaasystematicreview