Cargando…
Experimental and procedural pain responses in primary dysmenorrhea: a systematic review
Primary dysmenorrhea (PD) has been the focus of a number of experimental pain studies. Although a number of reviews exist, few have critically evaluated the existing body of research on PD and experimental and procedural pain. Data from 19 published research articles that include women with PD and r...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5604431/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29066929 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S143512 |
_version_ | 1783264866034778112 |
---|---|
author | Payne, Laura A Rapkin, Andrea J Seidman, Laura C Zeltzer, Lonnie K Tsao, Jennie CI |
author_facet | Payne, Laura A Rapkin, Andrea J Seidman, Laura C Zeltzer, Lonnie K Tsao, Jennie CI |
author_sort | Payne, Laura A |
collection | PubMed |
description | Primary dysmenorrhea (PD) has been the focus of a number of experimental pain studies. Although a number of reviews exist, few have critically evaluated the existing body of research on PD and experimental and procedural pain. Data from 19 published research articles that include women with PD and responses to an experimental or procedural pain stimulus (or stimuli) suggest that women with PD may have elevated pain reactivity, as compared to women without PD. This pattern appears to be true across different phases of the menstrual cycle. However, there is an abundance of conflicting findings, which may be due to significant methodological issues such as inconsistent definitions of PD, wide variation in experimental pain methodologies, and inaccurate assessment of the menstrual cycle. Future research should focus on identifying specific symptoms (i.e., pain threshold ratings) to more clearly define what constitutes PD, establish reliable and valid laboratory testing protocols, and assess the menstrual cycle with greater precision. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5604431 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56044312017-10-24 Experimental and procedural pain responses in primary dysmenorrhea: a systematic review Payne, Laura A Rapkin, Andrea J Seidman, Laura C Zeltzer, Lonnie K Tsao, Jennie CI J Pain Res Review Primary dysmenorrhea (PD) has been the focus of a number of experimental pain studies. Although a number of reviews exist, few have critically evaluated the existing body of research on PD and experimental and procedural pain. Data from 19 published research articles that include women with PD and responses to an experimental or procedural pain stimulus (or stimuli) suggest that women with PD may have elevated pain reactivity, as compared to women without PD. This pattern appears to be true across different phases of the menstrual cycle. However, there is an abundance of conflicting findings, which may be due to significant methodological issues such as inconsistent definitions of PD, wide variation in experimental pain methodologies, and inaccurate assessment of the menstrual cycle. Future research should focus on identifying specific symptoms (i.e., pain threshold ratings) to more clearly define what constitutes PD, establish reliable and valid laboratory testing protocols, and assess the menstrual cycle with greater precision. Dove Medical Press 2017-09-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5604431/ /pubmed/29066929 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S143512 Text en © 2017 Payne et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Review Payne, Laura A Rapkin, Andrea J Seidman, Laura C Zeltzer, Lonnie K Tsao, Jennie CI Experimental and procedural pain responses in primary dysmenorrhea: a systematic review |
title | Experimental and procedural pain responses in primary dysmenorrhea: a systematic review |
title_full | Experimental and procedural pain responses in primary dysmenorrhea: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Experimental and procedural pain responses in primary dysmenorrhea: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Experimental and procedural pain responses in primary dysmenorrhea: a systematic review |
title_short | Experimental and procedural pain responses in primary dysmenorrhea: a systematic review |
title_sort | experimental and procedural pain responses in primary dysmenorrhea: a systematic review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5604431/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29066929 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S143512 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT paynelauraa experimentalandproceduralpainresponsesinprimarydysmenorrheaasystematicreview AT rapkinandreaj experimentalandproceduralpainresponsesinprimarydysmenorrheaasystematicreview AT seidmanlaurac experimentalandproceduralpainresponsesinprimarydysmenorrheaasystematicreview AT zeltzerlonniek experimentalandproceduralpainresponsesinprimarydysmenorrheaasystematicreview AT tsaojennieci experimentalandproceduralpainresponsesinprimarydysmenorrheaasystematicreview |