Cargando…
Patients’ beliefs regarding informed consent for low-risk pragmatic trials
BACKGROUND: The requirement to obtain written informed consent may undermine the potential of pragmatic randomized clinical trials (pRCTs) to improve evidence-based care. This requirement could compromise trials statistical power or even force it to close them down prematurely. However, recent data...
Autores principales: | Dal-Ré, Rafael, Carcas, Antonio J., Carné, Xavier, Wendler, David |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5604493/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28923007 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-017-0424-3 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Public preferences on written informed consent for low‐risk pragmatic clinical trials in Spain
por: Dal‐Ré, Rafael, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Who is willing to participate in low-risk pragmatic clinical trials without consent?
por: Dal-Ré, Rafael, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
The approach to informed consent in acute care research
por: Dal-Ré, Rafael, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Waivers of informed consent in research with competent participants and the Declaration of Helsinki
por: Dal-Ré, Rafael
Publicado: (2023) -
Consumer perspectives on simplified, layered consent for a low risk, but complex pragmatic trial
por: Symons, Tanya J., et al.
Publicado: (2022)