Cargando…

Epidemiology of adult overweight recording and management by UK GPs: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: Primary care guidelines for managing adult overweight/obesity recommend routine measurement of body mass index (BMI) and the offer of weight management interventions. Many studies state that this is rarely done, but the extent to which overweight/obesity is recognised, considered, and do...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McLaughlin, Joanna C, Hamilton, Kathryn, Kipping, Ruth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Royal College of General Practitioners 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5604831/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28847775
http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/bjgp17X692309
_version_ 1783264920793513984
author McLaughlin, Joanna C
Hamilton, Kathryn
Kipping, Ruth
author_facet McLaughlin, Joanna C
Hamilton, Kathryn
Kipping, Ruth
author_sort McLaughlin, Joanna C
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Primary care guidelines for managing adult overweight/obesity recommend routine measurement of body mass index (BMI) and the offer of weight management interventions. Many studies state that this is rarely done, but the extent to which overweight/obesity is recognised, considered, and documented in routine care has not been determined. AIM: To identify the epidemiology of adult overweight documentation and management by UK GPs. DESIGN AND SETTING: A systematic review of studies since 2006 from eight electronic databases and grey literature. METHOD: Included studies measured the proportion of adult patients with documented BMI or weight loss intervention offers in routine primary care in the UK. A narrative synthesis reports the prevalence and pattern of the outcomes. RESULTS: In total, 2845 articles were identified, and seven were included; four with UK-wide data and three with regional-level data. The proportion of patients with a documented BMI was 58–79% (28–37% within a year). For overweight/obese patients alone, 43–52% had a recent BMI record, and 15–42% had a documented intervention offer. BMI documentation was positively associated with older age, female sex, higher BMI, coexistent chronic disease, and higher deprivation. CONCLUSION: BMI is under-recorded and weight loss interventions are under-referred for primary care adult patients in the UK despite the obesity register in the Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF). The review identified likely underserved groups such as younger males and otherwise healthy overweight/obese individuals to whom attention should now be directed. The proposed amendment to the obesity register QOF could prompt improvements but has not been adopted for 2017.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5604831
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Royal College of General Practitioners
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56048312017-09-22 Epidemiology of adult overweight recording and management by UK GPs: a systematic review McLaughlin, Joanna C Hamilton, Kathryn Kipping, Ruth Br J Gen Pract Research BACKGROUND: Primary care guidelines for managing adult overweight/obesity recommend routine measurement of body mass index (BMI) and the offer of weight management interventions. Many studies state that this is rarely done, but the extent to which overweight/obesity is recognised, considered, and documented in routine care has not been determined. AIM: To identify the epidemiology of adult overweight documentation and management by UK GPs. DESIGN AND SETTING: A systematic review of studies since 2006 from eight electronic databases and grey literature. METHOD: Included studies measured the proportion of adult patients with documented BMI or weight loss intervention offers in routine primary care in the UK. A narrative synthesis reports the prevalence and pattern of the outcomes. RESULTS: In total, 2845 articles were identified, and seven were included; four with UK-wide data and three with regional-level data. The proportion of patients with a documented BMI was 58–79% (28–37% within a year). For overweight/obese patients alone, 43–52% had a recent BMI record, and 15–42% had a documented intervention offer. BMI documentation was positively associated with older age, female sex, higher BMI, coexistent chronic disease, and higher deprivation. CONCLUSION: BMI is under-recorded and weight loss interventions are under-referred for primary care adult patients in the UK despite the obesity register in the Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF). The review identified likely underserved groups such as younger males and otherwise healthy overweight/obese individuals to whom attention should now be directed. The proposed amendment to the obesity register QOF could prompt improvements but has not been adopted for 2017. Royal College of General Practitioners 2017-10 2017-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5604831/ /pubmed/28847775 http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/bjgp17X692309 Text en © British Journal of General Practice 2017 This is an OpenAccess article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
McLaughlin, Joanna C
Hamilton, Kathryn
Kipping, Ruth
Epidemiology of adult overweight recording and management by UK GPs: a systematic review
title Epidemiology of adult overweight recording and management by UK GPs: a systematic review
title_full Epidemiology of adult overweight recording and management by UK GPs: a systematic review
title_fullStr Epidemiology of adult overweight recording and management by UK GPs: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Epidemiology of adult overweight recording and management by UK GPs: a systematic review
title_short Epidemiology of adult overweight recording and management by UK GPs: a systematic review
title_sort epidemiology of adult overweight recording and management by uk gps: a systematic review
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5604831/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28847775
http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/bjgp17X692309
work_keys_str_mv AT mclaughlinjoannac epidemiologyofadultoverweightrecordingandmanagementbyukgpsasystematicreview
AT hamiltonkathryn epidemiologyofadultoverweightrecordingandmanagementbyukgpsasystematicreview
AT kippingruth epidemiologyofadultoverweightrecordingandmanagementbyukgpsasystematicreview