Cargando…

2D kV orthogonal imaging with fiducial markers is more precise for daily image guided alignments than soft-tissue cone beam computed tomography for prostate radiation therapy

PURPOSE: The hypothesis is that 2-dimensional kV orthogonal imaging with fiducial markers (kV-FM) and soft-tissue cone beam computed tomography (ST-CBCT) are equally reproducible for daily positional alignments for image guided (IG) intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for prostate cancer. M...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Goff, Peter H., Harrison, Louis B., Furhang, Eli, Ng, Evan, Bhatia, Stephen, Trichter, Frieda, Ennis, Ronald D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5605315/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29114611
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2017.05.001
_version_ 1783264965560369152
author Goff, Peter H.
Harrison, Louis B.
Furhang, Eli
Ng, Evan
Bhatia, Stephen
Trichter, Frieda
Ennis, Ronald D.
author_facet Goff, Peter H.
Harrison, Louis B.
Furhang, Eli
Ng, Evan
Bhatia, Stephen
Trichter, Frieda
Ennis, Ronald D.
author_sort Goff, Peter H.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The hypothesis is that 2-dimensional kV orthogonal imaging with fiducial markers (kV-FM) and soft-tissue cone beam computed tomography (ST-CBCT) are equally reproducible for daily positional alignments for image guided (IG) intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Ten patients undergoing definitive treatment for prostate cancer with IG-IMRT were imaged daily with kV-FM and ST-CBCT. For each acquired kV and CBCT image, offline alignments to the digitally reconstructed radiograph or planning CT, respectively, were made twice by the same physician to assess intraobserver test-retest reproducibility. The 256 kV and 142 CBCT images were analyzed, and the test-retest analysis was performed again on a subset of images by another physician to verify the results. RESULTS: The results demonstrated that kV-FM had better intraobserver test-retest reproducibility in the anterior-posterior (AP; 95% confidence interval [CI] Pearson correlation coefficient [r], 0.987-0.991), left-right (LR; 95% CI r, 0.955-0.969), and superior-inferior (SI; 95% CI r, 0.971-0.980) directions for daily IG alignments compared with ST-CBCT (AP: 95% CI r, 0.804-0.877; LR: 95% CI r, 0.877-0.924; SI: 95% CI r, 0.791-0.869). Errors associated with intraobserver test-retest reproducibility were submillimeter with kV-FM (AP: 0.4 ± 0.7 mm; RL: 0.4 ± 1.0 mm; SI: 0.5 ± 0.7 mm) compared with ST-CBCT (AP: 2.1 ± 2.2 mm; LR: 1.3 ± 1.4 mm; SI: 1.2 ± 1.8 mm). The mean shift differences between kV-FM and ST-CBCT were 0.3 ± 3.8 mm for AP, −1.1 ± 8.5 mm for LR, and −2.0 ± 3.7 mm for SI. Dose-volume histograms were generated and showed that test-retest variability associated with ST-CBCT IG-alignments resulted in significantly increased dose to normal structures and a reduced planning target volume dose in many patients. CONCLUSIONS: The kV-FM–based daily IG alignment for IMRT of prostate cancer is more precise than ST-CBCT, as assessed by a physician's ability to reproducibly align images. Given the magnitude of the error introduced by inconsistency in making ST-CBCT alignments, these data support a role for daily kV imaging of FM to enhance the precision of external beam dose delivery to the prostate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5605315
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56053152017-11-07 2D kV orthogonal imaging with fiducial markers is more precise for daily image guided alignments than soft-tissue cone beam computed tomography for prostate radiation therapy Goff, Peter H. Harrison, Louis B. Furhang, Eli Ng, Evan Bhatia, Stephen Trichter, Frieda Ennis, Ronald D. Adv Radiat Oncol Scientific Article PURPOSE: The hypothesis is that 2-dimensional kV orthogonal imaging with fiducial markers (kV-FM) and soft-tissue cone beam computed tomography (ST-CBCT) are equally reproducible for daily positional alignments for image guided (IG) intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Ten patients undergoing definitive treatment for prostate cancer with IG-IMRT were imaged daily with kV-FM and ST-CBCT. For each acquired kV and CBCT image, offline alignments to the digitally reconstructed radiograph or planning CT, respectively, were made twice by the same physician to assess intraobserver test-retest reproducibility. The 256 kV and 142 CBCT images were analyzed, and the test-retest analysis was performed again on a subset of images by another physician to verify the results. RESULTS: The results demonstrated that kV-FM had better intraobserver test-retest reproducibility in the anterior-posterior (AP; 95% confidence interval [CI] Pearson correlation coefficient [r], 0.987-0.991), left-right (LR; 95% CI r, 0.955-0.969), and superior-inferior (SI; 95% CI r, 0.971-0.980) directions for daily IG alignments compared with ST-CBCT (AP: 95% CI r, 0.804-0.877; LR: 95% CI r, 0.877-0.924; SI: 95% CI r, 0.791-0.869). Errors associated with intraobserver test-retest reproducibility were submillimeter with kV-FM (AP: 0.4 ± 0.7 mm; RL: 0.4 ± 1.0 mm; SI: 0.5 ± 0.7 mm) compared with ST-CBCT (AP: 2.1 ± 2.2 mm; LR: 1.3 ± 1.4 mm; SI: 1.2 ± 1.8 mm). The mean shift differences between kV-FM and ST-CBCT were 0.3 ± 3.8 mm for AP, −1.1 ± 8.5 mm for LR, and −2.0 ± 3.7 mm for SI. Dose-volume histograms were generated and showed that test-retest variability associated with ST-CBCT IG-alignments resulted in significantly increased dose to normal structures and a reduced planning target volume dose in many patients. CONCLUSIONS: The kV-FM–based daily IG alignment for IMRT of prostate cancer is more precise than ST-CBCT, as assessed by a physician's ability to reproducibly align images. Given the magnitude of the error introduced by inconsistency in making ST-CBCT alignments, these data support a role for daily kV imaging of FM to enhance the precision of external beam dose delivery to the prostate. Elsevier 2017-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5605315/ /pubmed/29114611 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2017.05.001 Text en © 2017 The Authors on behalf of the American Society for Radiation Oncology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Scientific Article
Goff, Peter H.
Harrison, Louis B.
Furhang, Eli
Ng, Evan
Bhatia, Stephen
Trichter, Frieda
Ennis, Ronald D.
2D kV orthogonal imaging with fiducial markers is more precise for daily image guided alignments than soft-tissue cone beam computed tomography for prostate radiation therapy
title 2D kV orthogonal imaging with fiducial markers is more precise for daily image guided alignments than soft-tissue cone beam computed tomography for prostate radiation therapy
title_full 2D kV orthogonal imaging with fiducial markers is more precise for daily image guided alignments than soft-tissue cone beam computed tomography for prostate radiation therapy
title_fullStr 2D kV orthogonal imaging with fiducial markers is more precise for daily image guided alignments than soft-tissue cone beam computed tomography for prostate radiation therapy
title_full_unstemmed 2D kV orthogonal imaging with fiducial markers is more precise for daily image guided alignments than soft-tissue cone beam computed tomography for prostate radiation therapy
title_short 2D kV orthogonal imaging with fiducial markers is more precise for daily image guided alignments than soft-tissue cone beam computed tomography for prostate radiation therapy
title_sort 2d kv orthogonal imaging with fiducial markers is more precise for daily image guided alignments than soft-tissue cone beam computed tomography for prostate radiation therapy
topic Scientific Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5605315/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29114611
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2017.05.001
work_keys_str_mv AT goffpeterh 2dkvorthogonalimagingwithfiducialmarkersismoreprecisefordailyimageguidedalignmentsthansofttissueconebeamcomputedtomographyforprostateradiationtherapy
AT harrisonlouisb 2dkvorthogonalimagingwithfiducialmarkersismoreprecisefordailyimageguidedalignmentsthansofttissueconebeamcomputedtomographyforprostateradiationtherapy
AT furhangeli 2dkvorthogonalimagingwithfiducialmarkersismoreprecisefordailyimageguidedalignmentsthansofttissueconebeamcomputedtomographyforprostateradiationtherapy
AT ngevan 2dkvorthogonalimagingwithfiducialmarkersismoreprecisefordailyimageguidedalignmentsthansofttissueconebeamcomputedtomographyforprostateradiationtherapy
AT bhatiastephen 2dkvorthogonalimagingwithfiducialmarkersismoreprecisefordailyimageguidedalignmentsthansofttissueconebeamcomputedtomographyforprostateradiationtherapy
AT trichterfrieda 2dkvorthogonalimagingwithfiducialmarkersismoreprecisefordailyimageguidedalignmentsthansofttissueconebeamcomputedtomographyforprostateradiationtherapy
AT ennisronaldd 2dkvorthogonalimagingwithfiducialmarkersismoreprecisefordailyimageguidedalignmentsthansofttissueconebeamcomputedtomographyforprostateradiationtherapy