Cargando…

Novel and supplementary management of pancreatic fluid collections: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage

AIM: To compare efficacy and safety of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided and surgical drainage in pancreatic fluid collection management. METHODS: Data were obtained retrospectively from January 2012 to December 2016. Patients with pancreatic fluid collection were performed EUS-guided or surgical p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hao, Si-Jie, Xu, Wei-Jia, Di, Yang, Yao, Lie, He, Hang, Yang, Feng, Jin, Chen, Zhong, Liang, Fu, De-Liang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5605349/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28979714
http://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v9.i9.486
Descripción
Sumario:AIM: To compare efficacy and safety of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided and surgical drainage in pancreatic fluid collection management. METHODS: Data were obtained retrospectively from January 2012 to December 2016. Patients with pancreatic fluid collection were performed EUS-guided or surgical procedure. Main outcome measures including clinical efficiency, complication, duration of procedures, hospital stay and cost were analyzed. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients were enrolled into the study, including 14 in endoscopic group while 22 in the surgical group. Twelve (86%) patients were treated successfully by endoscopic approach while 21 (95%) patients benefited through surgical procedure. Endoscopic treatment had higher recurrence and complication rates than surgery, resulting in more re-interventions. Meanwhile, duration of procedure, hospital stay and cost were significantly lower in endoscopic group. CONCLUSION: Both approaches were effective and safe. EUS-guided approach should be the first-line treatment in mild and simple cases, while surgical approach should be considered as priority in severe and complex cases.