Cargando…
A six stage operational framework for individualising injury risk management in sport
Managing injury risk is important for maximising athlete availability and performance. Although athletes are inherently predisposed to musculoskeletal injuries by participating in sports, etiology models have illustrated how susceptibility is influenced by repeat interactions between the athlete (i....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5605483/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28929466 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40621-017-0123-x |
_version_ | 1783264986458488832 |
---|---|
author | Roe, Mark Malone, Shane Blake, Catherine Collins, Kieran Gissane, Conor Büttner, Fionn Murphy, John C. Delahunt, Eamonn |
author_facet | Roe, Mark Malone, Shane Blake, Catherine Collins, Kieran Gissane, Conor Büttner, Fionn Murphy, John C. Delahunt, Eamonn |
author_sort | Roe, Mark |
collection | PubMed |
description | Managing injury risk is important for maximising athlete availability and performance. Although athletes are inherently predisposed to musculoskeletal injuries by participating in sports, etiology models have illustrated how susceptibility is influenced by repeat interactions between the athlete (i.e. intrinsic factors) and environmental stimuli (i.e. extrinsic factors). Such models also reveal that the likelihood of an injury emerging across time is related to the interconnectedness of multiple factors cumulating in a pattern of either positive (i.e. increased fitness) or negative adaptation (i.e. injury). The process of repeatedly exposing athletes to workloads in order to promote positive adaptations whilst minimising injury risk can be difficult to manage. Etiology models have highlighted that preventing injuries in sport, as opposed to reducing injury risk, is likely impossible given our inability to appreciate the interactions of the factors at play. Given these uncertainties, practitioners need to be able to design, deliver, and monitor risk management strategies that ensure a low susceptibility to injury is maintained during pursuits to enhance performance. The current article discusses previous etiology and injury prevention models before proposing a new operational framework. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5605483 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56054832017-09-27 A six stage operational framework for individualising injury risk management in sport Roe, Mark Malone, Shane Blake, Catherine Collins, Kieran Gissane, Conor Büttner, Fionn Murphy, John C. Delahunt, Eamonn Inj Epidemiol Commentary Managing injury risk is important for maximising athlete availability and performance. Although athletes are inherently predisposed to musculoskeletal injuries by participating in sports, etiology models have illustrated how susceptibility is influenced by repeat interactions between the athlete (i.e. intrinsic factors) and environmental stimuli (i.e. extrinsic factors). Such models also reveal that the likelihood of an injury emerging across time is related to the interconnectedness of multiple factors cumulating in a pattern of either positive (i.e. increased fitness) or negative adaptation (i.e. injury). The process of repeatedly exposing athletes to workloads in order to promote positive adaptations whilst minimising injury risk can be difficult to manage. Etiology models have highlighted that preventing injuries in sport, as opposed to reducing injury risk, is likely impossible given our inability to appreciate the interactions of the factors at play. Given these uncertainties, practitioners need to be able to design, deliver, and monitor risk management strategies that ensure a low susceptibility to injury is maintained during pursuits to enhance performance. The current article discusses previous etiology and injury prevention models before proposing a new operational framework. Springer International Publishing 2017-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5605483/ /pubmed/28929466 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40621-017-0123-x Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Commentary Roe, Mark Malone, Shane Blake, Catherine Collins, Kieran Gissane, Conor Büttner, Fionn Murphy, John C. Delahunt, Eamonn A six stage operational framework for individualising injury risk management in sport |
title | A six stage operational framework for individualising injury risk management in sport |
title_full | A six stage operational framework for individualising injury risk management in sport |
title_fullStr | A six stage operational framework for individualising injury risk management in sport |
title_full_unstemmed | A six stage operational framework for individualising injury risk management in sport |
title_short | A six stage operational framework for individualising injury risk management in sport |
title_sort | six stage operational framework for individualising injury risk management in sport |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5605483/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28929466 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40621-017-0123-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT roemark asixstageoperationalframeworkforindividualisinginjuryriskmanagementinsport AT maloneshane asixstageoperationalframeworkforindividualisinginjuryriskmanagementinsport AT blakecatherine asixstageoperationalframeworkforindividualisinginjuryriskmanagementinsport AT collinskieran asixstageoperationalframeworkforindividualisinginjuryriskmanagementinsport AT gissaneconor asixstageoperationalframeworkforindividualisinginjuryriskmanagementinsport AT buttnerfionn asixstageoperationalframeworkforindividualisinginjuryriskmanagementinsport AT murphyjohnc asixstageoperationalframeworkforindividualisinginjuryriskmanagementinsport AT delahunteamonn asixstageoperationalframeworkforindividualisinginjuryriskmanagementinsport AT roemark sixstageoperationalframeworkforindividualisinginjuryriskmanagementinsport AT maloneshane sixstageoperationalframeworkforindividualisinginjuryriskmanagementinsport AT blakecatherine sixstageoperationalframeworkforindividualisinginjuryriskmanagementinsport AT collinskieran sixstageoperationalframeworkforindividualisinginjuryriskmanagementinsport AT gissaneconor sixstageoperationalframeworkforindividualisinginjuryriskmanagementinsport AT buttnerfionn sixstageoperationalframeworkforindividualisinginjuryriskmanagementinsport AT murphyjohnc sixstageoperationalframeworkforindividualisinginjuryriskmanagementinsport AT delahunteamonn sixstageoperationalframeworkforindividualisinginjuryriskmanagementinsport |