Cargando…
Preoperative radiation dose escalation for rectal cancer using a concomitant boost strategy improves tumor downstaging without increasing toxicity: A matched-pair analysis
PURPOSE: Pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (CRT) is associated with improved outcomes for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). Increased response rates have been reported with higher radiation doses, but these studies often lack long-term outcome and/...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5605486/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29114614 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2017.04.001 |
_version_ | 1783264987174666240 |
---|---|
author | Gunther, Jillian R. Chadha, Awalpreet S. Shin, Ui Sup Park, In Ja Kattepogu, Kiran V. Grant, Jonathan D. Weksberg, David C. Eng, Cathy Kopetz, Scott E. Das, Prajnan Delclos, Marc E. Kaur, Harmeet Maru, Dipen M. Skibber, John M. Rodriguez-Bigas, Miguel A. You, Y. Nancy Krishnan, Sunil Chang, George J. |
author_facet | Gunther, Jillian R. Chadha, Awalpreet S. Shin, Ui Sup Park, In Ja Kattepogu, Kiran V. Grant, Jonathan D. Weksberg, David C. Eng, Cathy Kopetz, Scott E. Das, Prajnan Delclos, Marc E. Kaur, Harmeet Maru, Dipen M. Skibber, John M. Rodriguez-Bigas, Miguel A. You, Y. Nancy Krishnan, Sunil Chang, George J. |
author_sort | Gunther, Jillian R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (CRT) is associated with improved outcomes for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). Increased response rates have been reported with higher radiation doses, but these studies often lack long-term outcome and/or toxicity data. We conducted a case-control analysis of patients with LARC who underwent definitive CRT to determine the efficacy and safety of intensified treatment with a concomitant boost (CB) approach. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From 1995 to 2003, a phase 2 protocol examined CRT with 5-fluorouracil and CB radiation therapy (52.5 Gy in 5 weeks) for patients with LARC. Seventy-six protocol patients were matched (case-control approach) for surgery type, tumor (T) stage, and clinical nodal (N) stage with patients who received standard dose (SD) CRT (5-fluorouracil, 45 Gy). A chart review was performed. McNemar's test and Kaplan-Meier analyses were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: The SD and CB groups did not differ in tumor circumferential involvement and length, but the tumors of CB patients were closer to the anal verge (4.7 vs 5.7 cm; P = .02). Although tumor downstaging was higher in the CB cohort (76% vs 51%; P < .01), pathologic complete response rates did not differ (CB, 17.1% vs SD, 15.8%, P = 1.00). The incidence of grade ≥3 radiation-related toxicities was low and similar in both groups (CB, 10% vs SD, 3%, P = .22). Postoperative (anastomotic leak, wound complications/abscess, bleeding) and late (small bowel obstruction, stricture) complication rates did not differ between the groups (P > .05). The median follow-up was 11.9 years. The 5-year local control rates were higher for CB (100.0%) compared with SD (90.0%) patients (P = .01). CB patients had higher rates of 10-year progression-free survival (71.9% vs 57.6%, P < .01) and overall survival (71.6% vs 62.4%, P = .01) compared with SD patients. CONCLUSIONS: CRT dose escalation for patients with LARC is safe and effective. The improved T-downstaging and local control observed in CB patients should encourage further dose escalation studies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5605486 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56054862017-11-07 Preoperative radiation dose escalation for rectal cancer using a concomitant boost strategy improves tumor downstaging without increasing toxicity: A matched-pair analysis Gunther, Jillian R. Chadha, Awalpreet S. Shin, Ui Sup Park, In Ja Kattepogu, Kiran V. Grant, Jonathan D. Weksberg, David C. Eng, Cathy Kopetz, Scott E. Das, Prajnan Delclos, Marc E. Kaur, Harmeet Maru, Dipen M. Skibber, John M. Rodriguez-Bigas, Miguel A. You, Y. Nancy Krishnan, Sunil Chang, George J. Adv Radiat Oncol Scientific Article PURPOSE: Pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (CRT) is associated with improved outcomes for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). Increased response rates have been reported with higher radiation doses, but these studies often lack long-term outcome and/or toxicity data. We conducted a case-control analysis of patients with LARC who underwent definitive CRT to determine the efficacy and safety of intensified treatment with a concomitant boost (CB) approach. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From 1995 to 2003, a phase 2 protocol examined CRT with 5-fluorouracil and CB radiation therapy (52.5 Gy in 5 weeks) for patients with LARC. Seventy-six protocol patients were matched (case-control approach) for surgery type, tumor (T) stage, and clinical nodal (N) stage with patients who received standard dose (SD) CRT (5-fluorouracil, 45 Gy). A chart review was performed. McNemar's test and Kaplan-Meier analyses were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: The SD and CB groups did not differ in tumor circumferential involvement and length, but the tumors of CB patients were closer to the anal verge (4.7 vs 5.7 cm; P = .02). Although tumor downstaging was higher in the CB cohort (76% vs 51%; P < .01), pathologic complete response rates did not differ (CB, 17.1% vs SD, 15.8%, P = 1.00). The incidence of grade ≥3 radiation-related toxicities was low and similar in both groups (CB, 10% vs SD, 3%, P = .22). Postoperative (anastomotic leak, wound complications/abscess, bleeding) and late (small bowel obstruction, stricture) complication rates did not differ between the groups (P > .05). The median follow-up was 11.9 years. The 5-year local control rates were higher for CB (100.0%) compared with SD (90.0%) patients (P = .01). CB patients had higher rates of 10-year progression-free survival (71.9% vs 57.6%, P < .01) and overall survival (71.6% vs 62.4%, P = .01) compared with SD patients. CONCLUSIONS: CRT dose escalation for patients with LARC is safe and effective. The improved T-downstaging and local control observed in CB patients should encourage further dose escalation studies. Elsevier 2017-04-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5605486/ /pubmed/29114614 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2017.04.001 Text en © 2017 The Authors on behalf of the American Society for Radiation Oncology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Scientific Article Gunther, Jillian R. Chadha, Awalpreet S. Shin, Ui Sup Park, In Ja Kattepogu, Kiran V. Grant, Jonathan D. Weksberg, David C. Eng, Cathy Kopetz, Scott E. Das, Prajnan Delclos, Marc E. Kaur, Harmeet Maru, Dipen M. Skibber, John M. Rodriguez-Bigas, Miguel A. You, Y. Nancy Krishnan, Sunil Chang, George J. Preoperative radiation dose escalation for rectal cancer using a concomitant boost strategy improves tumor downstaging without increasing toxicity: A matched-pair analysis |
title | Preoperative radiation dose escalation for rectal cancer using a concomitant boost strategy improves tumor downstaging without increasing toxicity: A matched-pair analysis |
title_full | Preoperative radiation dose escalation for rectal cancer using a concomitant boost strategy improves tumor downstaging without increasing toxicity: A matched-pair analysis |
title_fullStr | Preoperative radiation dose escalation for rectal cancer using a concomitant boost strategy improves tumor downstaging without increasing toxicity: A matched-pair analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Preoperative radiation dose escalation for rectal cancer using a concomitant boost strategy improves tumor downstaging without increasing toxicity: A matched-pair analysis |
title_short | Preoperative radiation dose escalation for rectal cancer using a concomitant boost strategy improves tumor downstaging without increasing toxicity: A matched-pair analysis |
title_sort | preoperative radiation dose escalation for rectal cancer using a concomitant boost strategy improves tumor downstaging without increasing toxicity: a matched-pair analysis |
topic | Scientific Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5605486/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29114614 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2017.04.001 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT guntherjillianr preoperativeradiationdoseescalationforrectalcancerusingaconcomitantbooststrategyimprovestumordownstagingwithoutincreasingtoxicityamatchedpairanalysis AT chadhaawalpreets preoperativeradiationdoseescalationforrectalcancerusingaconcomitantbooststrategyimprovestumordownstagingwithoutincreasingtoxicityamatchedpairanalysis AT shinuisup preoperativeradiationdoseescalationforrectalcancerusingaconcomitantbooststrategyimprovestumordownstagingwithoutincreasingtoxicityamatchedpairanalysis AT parkinja preoperativeradiationdoseescalationforrectalcancerusingaconcomitantbooststrategyimprovestumordownstagingwithoutincreasingtoxicityamatchedpairanalysis AT kattepogukiranv preoperativeradiationdoseescalationforrectalcancerusingaconcomitantbooststrategyimprovestumordownstagingwithoutincreasingtoxicityamatchedpairanalysis AT grantjonathand preoperativeradiationdoseescalationforrectalcancerusingaconcomitantbooststrategyimprovestumordownstagingwithoutincreasingtoxicityamatchedpairanalysis AT weksbergdavidc preoperativeradiationdoseescalationforrectalcancerusingaconcomitantbooststrategyimprovestumordownstagingwithoutincreasingtoxicityamatchedpairanalysis AT engcathy preoperativeradiationdoseescalationforrectalcancerusingaconcomitantbooststrategyimprovestumordownstagingwithoutincreasingtoxicityamatchedpairanalysis AT kopetzscotte preoperativeradiationdoseescalationforrectalcancerusingaconcomitantbooststrategyimprovestumordownstagingwithoutincreasingtoxicityamatchedpairanalysis AT dasprajnan preoperativeradiationdoseescalationforrectalcancerusingaconcomitantbooststrategyimprovestumordownstagingwithoutincreasingtoxicityamatchedpairanalysis AT delclosmarce preoperativeradiationdoseescalationforrectalcancerusingaconcomitantbooststrategyimprovestumordownstagingwithoutincreasingtoxicityamatchedpairanalysis AT kaurharmeet preoperativeradiationdoseescalationforrectalcancerusingaconcomitantbooststrategyimprovestumordownstagingwithoutincreasingtoxicityamatchedpairanalysis AT marudipenm preoperativeradiationdoseescalationforrectalcancerusingaconcomitantbooststrategyimprovestumordownstagingwithoutincreasingtoxicityamatchedpairanalysis AT skibberjohnm preoperativeradiationdoseescalationforrectalcancerusingaconcomitantbooststrategyimprovestumordownstagingwithoutincreasingtoxicityamatchedpairanalysis AT rodriguezbigasmiguela preoperativeradiationdoseescalationforrectalcancerusingaconcomitantbooststrategyimprovestumordownstagingwithoutincreasingtoxicityamatchedpairanalysis AT youynancy preoperativeradiationdoseescalationforrectalcancerusingaconcomitantbooststrategyimprovestumordownstagingwithoutincreasingtoxicityamatchedpairanalysis AT krishnansunil preoperativeradiationdoseescalationforrectalcancerusingaconcomitantbooststrategyimprovestumordownstagingwithoutincreasingtoxicityamatchedpairanalysis AT changgeorgej preoperativeradiationdoseescalationforrectalcancerusingaconcomitantbooststrategyimprovestumordownstagingwithoutincreasingtoxicityamatchedpairanalysis |