Cargando…

No evidence for binding of items to task-irrelevant backgrounds in visual working memory

When representing visual features such as color and shape in visual working memory (VWM), participants also represent the locations of those features as a spatial configuration of the locations of those features in the display. In everyday life, we encounter objects against some background, yet it i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Udale, Rob, Farrell, Simon, Kent, Christopher
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5605597/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28660397
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13421-017-0727-y
_version_ 1783265012270235648
author Udale, Rob
Farrell, Simon
Kent, Christopher
author_facet Udale, Rob
Farrell, Simon
Kent, Christopher
author_sort Udale, Rob
collection PubMed
description When representing visual features such as color and shape in visual working memory (VWM), participants also represent the locations of those features as a spatial configuration of the locations of those features in the display. In everyday life, we encounter objects against some background, yet it is unclear whether the configural representation in memory obligatorily constitutes the entire display, including that (often task-irrelevant) background information. In three experiments, participants completed a change detection task on color and shape; the memoranda were presented in front of uniform gray backgrounds, a textured background (Exp. 1), or a background containing location placeholders (Exps. 2 and 3). When whole-display probes were presented, changes to the objects’ locations or feature bindings impacted memory performance—implying that the spatial configuration of the probes influenced participants’ change decisions. Furthermore, when only a single item was probed, the effect of changing its location or feature bindings was either diminished or completely extinguished, implying that single probes do not necessarily elicit the entire spatial configuration. Critically, when task-irrelevant backgrounds were also presented that may have provided a spatial configuration for the single probes, the effect of location or bindings was not moderated. These findings suggest that although the spatial configuration of a display guides VWM-based recognition, this information does not necessarily always influence the decision process during change detection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5605597
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56055972017-10-04 No evidence for binding of items to task-irrelevant backgrounds in visual working memory Udale, Rob Farrell, Simon Kent, Christopher Mem Cognit Article When representing visual features such as color and shape in visual working memory (VWM), participants also represent the locations of those features as a spatial configuration of the locations of those features in the display. In everyday life, we encounter objects against some background, yet it is unclear whether the configural representation in memory obligatorily constitutes the entire display, including that (often task-irrelevant) background information. In three experiments, participants completed a change detection task on color and shape; the memoranda were presented in front of uniform gray backgrounds, a textured background (Exp. 1), or a background containing location placeholders (Exps. 2 and 3). When whole-display probes were presented, changes to the objects’ locations or feature bindings impacted memory performance—implying that the spatial configuration of the probes influenced participants’ change decisions. Furthermore, when only a single item was probed, the effect of changing its location or feature bindings was either diminished or completely extinguished, implying that single probes do not necessarily elicit the entire spatial configuration. Critically, when task-irrelevant backgrounds were also presented that may have provided a spatial configuration for the single probes, the effect of location or bindings was not moderated. These findings suggest that although the spatial configuration of a display guides VWM-based recognition, this information does not necessarily always influence the decision process during change detection. Springer US 2017-06-28 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5605597/ /pubmed/28660397 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13421-017-0727-y Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Article
Udale, Rob
Farrell, Simon
Kent, Christopher
No evidence for binding of items to task-irrelevant backgrounds in visual working memory
title No evidence for binding of items to task-irrelevant backgrounds in visual working memory
title_full No evidence for binding of items to task-irrelevant backgrounds in visual working memory
title_fullStr No evidence for binding of items to task-irrelevant backgrounds in visual working memory
title_full_unstemmed No evidence for binding of items to task-irrelevant backgrounds in visual working memory
title_short No evidence for binding of items to task-irrelevant backgrounds in visual working memory
title_sort no evidence for binding of items to task-irrelevant backgrounds in visual working memory
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5605597/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28660397
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13421-017-0727-y
work_keys_str_mv AT udalerob noevidenceforbindingofitemstotaskirrelevantbackgroundsinvisualworkingmemory
AT farrellsimon noevidenceforbindingofitemstotaskirrelevantbackgroundsinvisualworkingmemory
AT kentchristopher noevidenceforbindingofitemstotaskirrelevantbackgroundsinvisualworkingmemory