Cargando…

Eight orthopedic surgeons achieved moderate to excellent reliability measuring the preoperative posterior tilt angle in 50 Garden-I and Garden-II femoral neck fractures

BACKGROUND: Studies of elderly patients with Garden-I and Garden-II femoral neck fractures (FNFs) suggest that a preoperative posterior tilt of the femoral head of at least 20° increases the risk of fixation failure. A recently published treatment algorithm recommended hemiarthroplasty over internal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dolatowski, Filip C., Hoelsbrekken, Sigurd Erik
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5605970/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28927455
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-017-0632-x
_version_ 1783265076152631296
author Dolatowski, Filip C.
Hoelsbrekken, Sigurd Erik
author_facet Dolatowski, Filip C.
Hoelsbrekken, Sigurd Erik
author_sort Dolatowski, Filip C.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Studies of elderly patients with Garden-I and Garden-II femoral neck fractures (FNFs) suggest that a preoperative posterior tilt of the femoral head of at least 20° increases the risk of fixation failure. A recently published treatment algorithm recommended hemiarthroplasty over internal fixation for elderly patients with Garden-I and Garden-II FNFs and a preoperative posterior tilt of at least 20°. However, the reliability of the method used to measure the posterior tilt has not been assessed according to recommended standards for reliability trials. METHODS: Four orthopedic registrars and four consultants measured the posterior tilt angle in 50 preoperative lateral radiographs at two occasions six weeks apart. We estimated inter- and intrarater reliability by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). We also assessed repeatability by the repeatability coefficient (RC) and agreement by the minimal detectable change (MDC). Based on the suggested cutoff value of 20°, we reported the overall percentage and specific agreement for the choice of implant. RESULTS: Inter- and intrarater reliability for all raters was excellent with an ICC (95% CI) of 0.77 (0.69–0.85) and 0.77 (0.67–0.86), respectively. The RC was 13.9 and the MDC 14.1. Specific agreement for choosing arthroplasty was 61.3 and 54.6% for the first and second test occasion, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Eight orthopedic surgeons measured the posterior tilt in 50 Garden-I and Garden-II FNFs and achieved excellent inter- and intrarater reliability. However, variations in repeated measurements and variations in measurements made by different raters, as assessed by the RC and the MDC respectively, ranged from 13.9° to 14.1°. The variations in posterior tilt measurements should be taken into account when choosing the type of implant for elderly patients with Garden-I and Garden-II femoral neck fractures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5605970
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56059702017-09-20 Eight orthopedic surgeons achieved moderate to excellent reliability measuring the preoperative posterior tilt angle in 50 Garden-I and Garden-II femoral neck fractures Dolatowski, Filip C. Hoelsbrekken, Sigurd Erik J Orthop Surg Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Studies of elderly patients with Garden-I and Garden-II femoral neck fractures (FNFs) suggest that a preoperative posterior tilt of the femoral head of at least 20° increases the risk of fixation failure. A recently published treatment algorithm recommended hemiarthroplasty over internal fixation for elderly patients with Garden-I and Garden-II FNFs and a preoperative posterior tilt of at least 20°. However, the reliability of the method used to measure the posterior tilt has not been assessed according to recommended standards for reliability trials. METHODS: Four orthopedic registrars and four consultants measured the posterior tilt angle in 50 preoperative lateral radiographs at two occasions six weeks apart. We estimated inter- and intrarater reliability by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). We also assessed repeatability by the repeatability coefficient (RC) and agreement by the minimal detectable change (MDC). Based on the suggested cutoff value of 20°, we reported the overall percentage and specific agreement for the choice of implant. RESULTS: Inter- and intrarater reliability for all raters was excellent with an ICC (95% CI) of 0.77 (0.69–0.85) and 0.77 (0.67–0.86), respectively. The RC was 13.9 and the MDC 14.1. Specific agreement for choosing arthroplasty was 61.3 and 54.6% for the first and second test occasion, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Eight orthopedic surgeons measured the posterior tilt in 50 Garden-I and Garden-II FNFs and achieved excellent inter- and intrarater reliability. However, variations in repeated measurements and variations in measurements made by different raters, as assessed by the RC and the MDC respectively, ranged from 13.9° to 14.1°. The variations in posterior tilt measurements should be taken into account when choosing the type of implant for elderly patients with Garden-I and Garden-II femoral neck fractures. BioMed Central 2017-09-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5605970/ /pubmed/28927455 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-017-0632-x Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Dolatowski, Filip C.
Hoelsbrekken, Sigurd Erik
Eight orthopedic surgeons achieved moderate to excellent reliability measuring the preoperative posterior tilt angle in 50 Garden-I and Garden-II femoral neck fractures
title Eight orthopedic surgeons achieved moderate to excellent reliability measuring the preoperative posterior tilt angle in 50 Garden-I and Garden-II femoral neck fractures
title_full Eight orthopedic surgeons achieved moderate to excellent reliability measuring the preoperative posterior tilt angle in 50 Garden-I and Garden-II femoral neck fractures
title_fullStr Eight orthopedic surgeons achieved moderate to excellent reliability measuring the preoperative posterior tilt angle in 50 Garden-I and Garden-II femoral neck fractures
title_full_unstemmed Eight orthopedic surgeons achieved moderate to excellent reliability measuring the preoperative posterior tilt angle in 50 Garden-I and Garden-II femoral neck fractures
title_short Eight orthopedic surgeons achieved moderate to excellent reliability measuring the preoperative posterior tilt angle in 50 Garden-I and Garden-II femoral neck fractures
title_sort eight orthopedic surgeons achieved moderate to excellent reliability measuring the preoperative posterior tilt angle in 50 garden-i and garden-ii femoral neck fractures
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5605970/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28927455
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-017-0632-x
work_keys_str_mv AT dolatowskifilipc eightorthopedicsurgeonsachievedmoderatetoexcellentreliabilitymeasuringthepreoperativeposteriortiltanglein50gardeniandgardeniifemoralneckfractures
AT hoelsbrekkensigurderik eightorthopedicsurgeonsachievedmoderatetoexcellentreliabilitymeasuringthepreoperativeposteriortiltanglein50gardeniandgardeniifemoralneckfractures