Cargando…

Goleman’s Leadership styles at different hierarchical levels in medical education

BACKGROUND: With current emphasis on leadership in medicine, this study explores Goleman’s leadership styles of medical education leaders at different hierarchical levels and gain insight into factors that contribute to the appropriateness of practices. METHODS: Forty two leaders (28 first-level wit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Saxena, Anurag, Desanghere, Loni, Stobart, Kent, Walker, Keith
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5606110/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28927466
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-017-0995-z
_version_ 1783265106174410752
author Saxena, Anurag
Desanghere, Loni
Stobart, Kent
Walker, Keith
author_facet Saxena, Anurag
Desanghere, Loni
Stobart, Kent
Walker, Keith
author_sort Saxena, Anurag
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: With current emphasis on leadership in medicine, this study explores Goleman’s leadership styles of medical education leaders at different hierarchical levels and gain insight into factors that contribute to the appropriateness of practices. METHODS: Forty two leaders (28 first-level with limited formal authority, eight middle-level with wider program responsibility and six senior- level with higher organizational authority) rank ordered their preferred Goleman’s styles and provided comments. Eight additional senior leaders were interviewed in-depth. Differences in ranked styles within groups were determined by Friedman tests and Wilcoxon tests. Based upon style descriptions, confirmatory template analysis was used to identify Goleman’s styles for each interviewed participant. Content analysis was used to identify themes that affected leadership styles. RESULTS: There were differences in the repertoire and preferred styles at different leadership levels. As a group, first-level leaders preferred democratic, middle-level used coaching while the senior leaders did not have one preferred style and used multiple styles. Women and men preferred democratic and coaching styles respectively. The varied use of styles reflected leadership conceptualizations, leader accountabilities, contextual adaptations, the situation and its evolution, leaders’ awareness of how they themselves were situated, and personal preferences and discomfort with styles. The not uncommon use of pace-setting and commanding styles by senior leaders, who were interviewed, was linked to working with physicians and delivering quickly on outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Leaders at different levels in medical education draw from a repertoire of styles. Leadership development should incorporate learning of different leadership styles, especially at first- and mid-level positions. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12909-017-0995-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5606110
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56061102017-09-20 Goleman’s Leadership styles at different hierarchical levels in medical education Saxena, Anurag Desanghere, Loni Stobart, Kent Walker, Keith BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: With current emphasis on leadership in medicine, this study explores Goleman’s leadership styles of medical education leaders at different hierarchical levels and gain insight into factors that contribute to the appropriateness of practices. METHODS: Forty two leaders (28 first-level with limited formal authority, eight middle-level with wider program responsibility and six senior- level with higher organizational authority) rank ordered their preferred Goleman’s styles and provided comments. Eight additional senior leaders were interviewed in-depth. Differences in ranked styles within groups were determined by Friedman tests and Wilcoxon tests. Based upon style descriptions, confirmatory template analysis was used to identify Goleman’s styles for each interviewed participant. Content analysis was used to identify themes that affected leadership styles. RESULTS: There were differences in the repertoire and preferred styles at different leadership levels. As a group, first-level leaders preferred democratic, middle-level used coaching while the senior leaders did not have one preferred style and used multiple styles. Women and men preferred democratic and coaching styles respectively. The varied use of styles reflected leadership conceptualizations, leader accountabilities, contextual adaptations, the situation and its evolution, leaders’ awareness of how they themselves were situated, and personal preferences and discomfort with styles. The not uncommon use of pace-setting and commanding styles by senior leaders, who were interviewed, was linked to working with physicians and delivering quickly on outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Leaders at different levels in medical education draw from a repertoire of styles. Leadership development should incorporate learning of different leadership styles, especially at first- and mid-level positions. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12909-017-0995-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-09-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5606110/ /pubmed/28927466 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-017-0995-z Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Saxena, Anurag
Desanghere, Loni
Stobart, Kent
Walker, Keith
Goleman’s Leadership styles at different hierarchical levels in medical education
title Goleman’s Leadership styles at different hierarchical levels in medical education
title_full Goleman’s Leadership styles at different hierarchical levels in medical education
title_fullStr Goleman’s Leadership styles at different hierarchical levels in medical education
title_full_unstemmed Goleman’s Leadership styles at different hierarchical levels in medical education
title_short Goleman’s Leadership styles at different hierarchical levels in medical education
title_sort goleman’s leadership styles at different hierarchical levels in medical education
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5606110/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28927466
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-017-0995-z
work_keys_str_mv AT saxenaanurag golemansleadershipstylesatdifferenthierarchicallevelsinmedicaleducation
AT desanghereloni golemansleadershipstylesatdifferenthierarchicallevelsinmedicaleducation
AT stobartkent golemansleadershipstylesatdifferenthierarchicallevelsinmedicaleducation
AT walkerkeith golemansleadershipstylesatdifferenthierarchicallevelsinmedicaleducation