Cargando…
Rationale and design of the AdaptResponse trial: a prospective randomized study of cardiac resynchronization therapy with preferential adaptive left ventricular‐only pacing
The AdaptResponse trial is designed to test the hypothesis that preferential adaptive left ventricular‐only pacing with the AdaptivCRT(®) algorithm reduces the incidence of the combined endpoint of all‐cause mortality and intervention for heart failure (HF) decompensation, compared with conventional...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5606499/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28708290 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.895 |
_version_ | 1783265128953675776 |
---|---|
author | Filippatos, Gerasimos Birnie, David Gold, Michael R. Gerritse, Bart Hersi, Ahmad Jacobs, Sandra Kusano, Kengo Leclercq, Christophe Mullens, Wilfried Wilkoff, Bruce L. |
author_facet | Filippatos, Gerasimos Birnie, David Gold, Michael R. Gerritse, Bart Hersi, Ahmad Jacobs, Sandra Kusano, Kengo Leclercq, Christophe Mullens, Wilfried Wilkoff, Bruce L. |
author_sort | Filippatos, Gerasimos |
collection | PubMed |
description | The AdaptResponse trial is designed to test the hypothesis that preferential adaptive left ventricular‐only pacing with the AdaptivCRT(®) algorithm reduces the incidence of the combined endpoint of all‐cause mortality and intervention for heart failure (HF) decompensation, compared with conventional cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), among patients with a CRT indication, left bundle branch block (LBBB) and normal atrioventricular (AV) conduction. The AdaptResponse study is a prospective, randomized, controlled, single‐blinded, multicentre, clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02205359), conducted at up to 200 centres worldwide. Following enrolment and baseline assessment, eligible subjects will be implanted with a CRT system containing the AdaptivCRT algorithm, and randomized in a 1:1 fashion to either a treatment (‘AdaptivCRT’) or control (‘Conventional CRT’) group. The study is designed to observe a primary endpoint in 1100 patients (‘event‐driven’) and approximately 3000 patients will be randomized. The primary endpoint is the composite of all‐cause mortality and intervention for HF decompensation; secondary endpoints include all‐cause mortality, intervention for HF decompensation, clinical composite score (CCS) at 6 months, atrial fibrillation, quality of life measured by the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ), health outcome measured by the EQ‐5D instrument, all‐cause readmission after a HF admission, and cost‐effectiveness. The AdaptResponse clinical trial is powered to assess clinical endpoints and is expected to provide definitive evidence on the incremental utility of AdaptivCRT‐enhanced CRT systems. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5606499 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56064992017-10-05 Rationale and design of the AdaptResponse trial: a prospective randomized study of cardiac resynchronization therapy with preferential adaptive left ventricular‐only pacing Filippatos, Gerasimos Birnie, David Gold, Michael R. Gerritse, Bart Hersi, Ahmad Jacobs, Sandra Kusano, Kengo Leclercq, Christophe Mullens, Wilfried Wilkoff, Bruce L. Eur J Heart Fail Trial Design The AdaptResponse trial is designed to test the hypothesis that preferential adaptive left ventricular‐only pacing with the AdaptivCRT(®) algorithm reduces the incidence of the combined endpoint of all‐cause mortality and intervention for heart failure (HF) decompensation, compared with conventional cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), among patients with a CRT indication, left bundle branch block (LBBB) and normal atrioventricular (AV) conduction. The AdaptResponse study is a prospective, randomized, controlled, single‐blinded, multicentre, clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02205359), conducted at up to 200 centres worldwide. Following enrolment and baseline assessment, eligible subjects will be implanted with a CRT system containing the AdaptivCRT algorithm, and randomized in a 1:1 fashion to either a treatment (‘AdaptivCRT’) or control (‘Conventional CRT’) group. The study is designed to observe a primary endpoint in 1100 patients (‘event‐driven’) and approximately 3000 patients will be randomized. The primary endpoint is the composite of all‐cause mortality and intervention for HF decompensation; secondary endpoints include all‐cause mortality, intervention for HF decompensation, clinical composite score (CCS) at 6 months, atrial fibrillation, quality of life measured by the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ), health outcome measured by the EQ‐5D instrument, all‐cause readmission after a HF admission, and cost‐effectiveness. The AdaptResponse clinical trial is powered to assess clinical endpoints and is expected to provide definitive evidence on the incremental utility of AdaptivCRT‐enhanced CRT systems. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2017-07-14 2017-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5606499/ /pubmed/28708290 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.895 Text en © 2017 The Authors. European Journal of Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Cardiology. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Trial Design Filippatos, Gerasimos Birnie, David Gold, Michael R. Gerritse, Bart Hersi, Ahmad Jacobs, Sandra Kusano, Kengo Leclercq, Christophe Mullens, Wilfried Wilkoff, Bruce L. Rationale and design of the AdaptResponse trial: a prospective randomized study of cardiac resynchronization therapy with preferential adaptive left ventricular‐only pacing |
title | Rationale and design of the AdaptResponse trial: a prospective randomized study of cardiac resynchronization therapy with preferential adaptive left ventricular‐only pacing |
title_full | Rationale and design of the AdaptResponse trial: a prospective randomized study of cardiac resynchronization therapy with preferential adaptive left ventricular‐only pacing |
title_fullStr | Rationale and design of the AdaptResponse trial: a prospective randomized study of cardiac resynchronization therapy with preferential adaptive left ventricular‐only pacing |
title_full_unstemmed | Rationale and design of the AdaptResponse trial: a prospective randomized study of cardiac resynchronization therapy with preferential adaptive left ventricular‐only pacing |
title_short | Rationale and design of the AdaptResponse trial: a prospective randomized study of cardiac resynchronization therapy with preferential adaptive left ventricular‐only pacing |
title_sort | rationale and design of the adaptresponse trial: a prospective randomized study of cardiac resynchronization therapy with preferential adaptive left ventricular‐only pacing |
topic | Trial Design |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5606499/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28708290 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.895 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT filippatosgerasimos rationaleanddesignoftheadaptresponsetrialaprospectiverandomizedstudyofcardiacresynchronizationtherapywithpreferentialadaptiveleftventricularonlypacing AT birniedavid rationaleanddesignoftheadaptresponsetrialaprospectiverandomizedstudyofcardiacresynchronizationtherapywithpreferentialadaptiveleftventricularonlypacing AT goldmichaelr rationaleanddesignoftheadaptresponsetrialaprospectiverandomizedstudyofcardiacresynchronizationtherapywithpreferentialadaptiveleftventricularonlypacing AT gerritsebart rationaleanddesignoftheadaptresponsetrialaprospectiverandomizedstudyofcardiacresynchronizationtherapywithpreferentialadaptiveleftventricularonlypacing AT hersiahmad rationaleanddesignoftheadaptresponsetrialaprospectiverandomizedstudyofcardiacresynchronizationtherapywithpreferentialadaptiveleftventricularonlypacing AT jacobssandra rationaleanddesignoftheadaptresponsetrialaprospectiverandomizedstudyofcardiacresynchronizationtherapywithpreferentialadaptiveleftventricularonlypacing AT kusanokengo rationaleanddesignoftheadaptresponsetrialaprospectiverandomizedstudyofcardiacresynchronizationtherapywithpreferentialadaptiveleftventricularonlypacing AT leclercqchristophe rationaleanddesignoftheadaptresponsetrialaprospectiverandomizedstudyofcardiacresynchronizationtherapywithpreferentialadaptiveleftventricularonlypacing AT mullenswilfried rationaleanddesignoftheadaptresponsetrialaprospectiverandomizedstudyofcardiacresynchronizationtherapywithpreferentialadaptiveleftventricularonlypacing AT wilkoffbrucel rationaleanddesignoftheadaptresponsetrialaprospectiverandomizedstudyofcardiacresynchronizationtherapywithpreferentialadaptiveleftventricularonlypacing AT rationaleanddesignoftheadaptresponsetrialaprospectiverandomizedstudyofcardiacresynchronizationtherapywithpreferentialadaptiveleftventricularonlypacing |