Cargando…

Rationale and design of the AdaptResponse trial: a prospective randomized study of cardiac resynchronization therapy with preferential adaptive left ventricular‐only pacing

The AdaptResponse trial is designed to test the hypothesis that preferential adaptive left ventricular‐only pacing with the AdaptivCRT(®) algorithm reduces the incidence of the combined endpoint of all‐cause mortality and intervention for heart failure (HF) decompensation, compared with conventional...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Filippatos, Gerasimos, Birnie, David, Gold, Michael R., Gerritse, Bart, Hersi, Ahmad, Jacobs, Sandra, Kusano, Kengo, Leclercq, Christophe, Mullens, Wilfried, Wilkoff, Bruce L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5606499/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28708290
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.895
_version_ 1783265128953675776
author Filippatos, Gerasimos
Birnie, David
Gold, Michael R.
Gerritse, Bart
Hersi, Ahmad
Jacobs, Sandra
Kusano, Kengo
Leclercq, Christophe
Mullens, Wilfried
Wilkoff, Bruce L.
author_facet Filippatos, Gerasimos
Birnie, David
Gold, Michael R.
Gerritse, Bart
Hersi, Ahmad
Jacobs, Sandra
Kusano, Kengo
Leclercq, Christophe
Mullens, Wilfried
Wilkoff, Bruce L.
author_sort Filippatos, Gerasimos
collection PubMed
description The AdaptResponse trial is designed to test the hypothesis that preferential adaptive left ventricular‐only pacing with the AdaptivCRT(®) algorithm reduces the incidence of the combined endpoint of all‐cause mortality and intervention for heart failure (HF) decompensation, compared with conventional cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), among patients with a CRT indication, left bundle branch block (LBBB) and normal atrioventricular (AV) conduction. The AdaptResponse study is a prospective, randomized, controlled, single‐blinded, multicentre, clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02205359), conducted at up to 200 centres worldwide. Following enrolment and baseline assessment, eligible subjects will be implanted with a CRT system containing the AdaptivCRT algorithm, and randomized in a 1:1 fashion to either a treatment (‘AdaptivCRT’) or control (‘Conventional CRT’) group. The study is designed to observe a primary endpoint in 1100 patients (‘event‐driven’) and approximately 3000 patients will be randomized. The primary endpoint is the composite of all‐cause mortality and intervention for HF decompensation; secondary endpoints include all‐cause mortality, intervention for HF decompensation, clinical composite score (CCS) at 6 months, atrial fibrillation, quality of life measured by the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ), health outcome measured by the EQ‐5D instrument, all‐cause readmission after a HF admission, and cost‐effectiveness. The AdaptResponse clinical trial is powered to assess clinical endpoints and is expected to provide definitive evidence on the incremental utility of AdaptivCRT‐enhanced CRT systems.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5606499
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56064992017-10-05 Rationale and design of the AdaptResponse trial: a prospective randomized study of cardiac resynchronization therapy with preferential adaptive left ventricular‐only pacing Filippatos, Gerasimos Birnie, David Gold, Michael R. Gerritse, Bart Hersi, Ahmad Jacobs, Sandra Kusano, Kengo Leclercq, Christophe Mullens, Wilfried Wilkoff, Bruce L. Eur J Heart Fail Trial Design The AdaptResponse trial is designed to test the hypothesis that preferential adaptive left ventricular‐only pacing with the AdaptivCRT(®) algorithm reduces the incidence of the combined endpoint of all‐cause mortality and intervention for heart failure (HF) decompensation, compared with conventional cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), among patients with a CRT indication, left bundle branch block (LBBB) and normal atrioventricular (AV) conduction. The AdaptResponse study is a prospective, randomized, controlled, single‐blinded, multicentre, clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02205359), conducted at up to 200 centres worldwide. Following enrolment and baseline assessment, eligible subjects will be implanted with a CRT system containing the AdaptivCRT algorithm, and randomized in a 1:1 fashion to either a treatment (‘AdaptivCRT’) or control (‘Conventional CRT’) group. The study is designed to observe a primary endpoint in 1100 patients (‘event‐driven’) and approximately 3000 patients will be randomized. The primary endpoint is the composite of all‐cause mortality and intervention for HF decompensation; secondary endpoints include all‐cause mortality, intervention for HF decompensation, clinical composite score (CCS) at 6 months, atrial fibrillation, quality of life measured by the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ), health outcome measured by the EQ‐5D instrument, all‐cause readmission after a HF admission, and cost‐effectiveness. The AdaptResponse clinical trial is powered to assess clinical endpoints and is expected to provide definitive evidence on the incremental utility of AdaptivCRT‐enhanced CRT systems. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2017-07-14 2017-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5606499/ /pubmed/28708290 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.895 Text en © 2017 The Authors. European Journal of Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Cardiology. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Trial Design
Filippatos, Gerasimos
Birnie, David
Gold, Michael R.
Gerritse, Bart
Hersi, Ahmad
Jacobs, Sandra
Kusano, Kengo
Leclercq, Christophe
Mullens, Wilfried
Wilkoff, Bruce L.
Rationale and design of the AdaptResponse trial: a prospective randomized study of cardiac resynchronization therapy with preferential adaptive left ventricular‐only pacing
title Rationale and design of the AdaptResponse trial: a prospective randomized study of cardiac resynchronization therapy with preferential adaptive left ventricular‐only pacing
title_full Rationale and design of the AdaptResponse trial: a prospective randomized study of cardiac resynchronization therapy with preferential adaptive left ventricular‐only pacing
title_fullStr Rationale and design of the AdaptResponse trial: a prospective randomized study of cardiac resynchronization therapy with preferential adaptive left ventricular‐only pacing
title_full_unstemmed Rationale and design of the AdaptResponse trial: a prospective randomized study of cardiac resynchronization therapy with preferential adaptive left ventricular‐only pacing
title_short Rationale and design of the AdaptResponse trial: a prospective randomized study of cardiac resynchronization therapy with preferential adaptive left ventricular‐only pacing
title_sort rationale and design of the adaptresponse trial: a prospective randomized study of cardiac resynchronization therapy with preferential adaptive left ventricular‐only pacing
topic Trial Design
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5606499/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28708290
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.895
work_keys_str_mv AT filippatosgerasimos rationaleanddesignoftheadaptresponsetrialaprospectiverandomizedstudyofcardiacresynchronizationtherapywithpreferentialadaptiveleftventricularonlypacing
AT birniedavid rationaleanddesignoftheadaptresponsetrialaprospectiverandomizedstudyofcardiacresynchronizationtherapywithpreferentialadaptiveleftventricularonlypacing
AT goldmichaelr rationaleanddesignoftheadaptresponsetrialaprospectiverandomizedstudyofcardiacresynchronizationtherapywithpreferentialadaptiveleftventricularonlypacing
AT gerritsebart rationaleanddesignoftheadaptresponsetrialaprospectiverandomizedstudyofcardiacresynchronizationtherapywithpreferentialadaptiveleftventricularonlypacing
AT hersiahmad rationaleanddesignoftheadaptresponsetrialaprospectiverandomizedstudyofcardiacresynchronizationtherapywithpreferentialadaptiveleftventricularonlypacing
AT jacobssandra rationaleanddesignoftheadaptresponsetrialaprospectiverandomizedstudyofcardiacresynchronizationtherapywithpreferentialadaptiveleftventricularonlypacing
AT kusanokengo rationaleanddesignoftheadaptresponsetrialaprospectiverandomizedstudyofcardiacresynchronizationtherapywithpreferentialadaptiveleftventricularonlypacing
AT leclercqchristophe rationaleanddesignoftheadaptresponsetrialaprospectiverandomizedstudyofcardiacresynchronizationtherapywithpreferentialadaptiveleftventricularonlypacing
AT mullenswilfried rationaleanddesignoftheadaptresponsetrialaprospectiverandomizedstudyofcardiacresynchronizationtherapywithpreferentialadaptiveleftventricularonlypacing
AT wilkoffbrucel rationaleanddesignoftheadaptresponsetrialaprospectiverandomizedstudyofcardiacresynchronizationtherapywithpreferentialadaptiveleftventricularonlypacing
AT rationaleanddesignoftheadaptresponsetrialaprospectiverandomizedstudyofcardiacresynchronizationtherapywithpreferentialadaptiveleftventricularonlypacing