Cargando…
The Big Pet Diabetes Survey: Perceived Frequency and Triggers for Euthanasia
Current pet diabetes mellitus (DM) treatment necessitates the active daily involvement of owners and can be costly. The current study aimed to investigate the owner population which opts for euthanasia instead of DM treatment. A survey was designed using multiple feedback steps and made available on...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5606606/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29056686 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vetsci4020027 |
_version_ | 1783265140303462400 |
---|---|
author | Niessen, Stijn J.M. Hazuchova, Katarina Powney, Sonya L. Guitian, Javier Niessen, Antonius P.M. Pion, Paul D. Shaw, James A. Church, David B. |
author_facet | Niessen, Stijn J.M. Hazuchova, Katarina Powney, Sonya L. Guitian, Javier Niessen, Antonius P.M. Pion, Paul D. Shaw, James A. Church, David B. |
author_sort | Niessen, Stijn J.M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Current pet diabetes mellitus (DM) treatment necessitates the active daily involvement of owners and can be costly. The current study aimed to investigate the owner population which opts for euthanasia instead of DM treatment. A survey was designed using multiple feedback steps and made available online to veterinarians world-wide. A total of 1192 veterinarians completed the survey and suggested a median one in 10 diabetic pets are euthanased at diagnosis; a further median one in 10 within one year because of lack of success or compliance. Perceived most important motivating factors included “presence concurrent disease” (45% respondents); “costs” (44%); “animal age” (37%); “problems obtaining adequate control” (35%); “pet welfare” (35%); and “impact owner’s lifestyle” (32%). Cats in Canadian (odds ratio (OR) 2.7), Australian (OR 2.3), rural (OR 1.6) and mixed (OR 1.7) practices were more likely to be euthanased because of DM diagnosis, while cats presented to referral/university were less likely to be euthanased (OR 0.6). Dogs were more likely to be euthanased because of DM in Canadian (OR 1.8), rural (OR 1.8) and mixed (OR 1.6) practices. The survey results suggest that benefit exists in improved DM education with emphasis on offering a choice of treatment styles ranging from intense and expensive to hands-off and cheap. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5606606 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56066062017-10-18 The Big Pet Diabetes Survey: Perceived Frequency and Triggers for Euthanasia Niessen, Stijn J.M. Hazuchova, Katarina Powney, Sonya L. Guitian, Javier Niessen, Antonius P.M. Pion, Paul D. Shaw, James A. Church, David B. Vet Sci Article Current pet diabetes mellitus (DM) treatment necessitates the active daily involvement of owners and can be costly. The current study aimed to investigate the owner population which opts for euthanasia instead of DM treatment. A survey was designed using multiple feedback steps and made available online to veterinarians world-wide. A total of 1192 veterinarians completed the survey and suggested a median one in 10 diabetic pets are euthanased at diagnosis; a further median one in 10 within one year because of lack of success or compliance. Perceived most important motivating factors included “presence concurrent disease” (45% respondents); “costs” (44%); “animal age” (37%); “problems obtaining adequate control” (35%); “pet welfare” (35%); and “impact owner’s lifestyle” (32%). Cats in Canadian (odds ratio (OR) 2.7), Australian (OR 2.3), rural (OR 1.6) and mixed (OR 1.7) practices were more likely to be euthanased because of DM diagnosis, while cats presented to referral/university were less likely to be euthanased (OR 0.6). Dogs were more likely to be euthanased because of DM in Canadian (OR 1.8), rural (OR 1.8) and mixed (OR 1.6) practices. The survey results suggest that benefit exists in improved DM education with emphasis on offering a choice of treatment styles ranging from intense and expensive to hands-off and cheap. MDPI 2017-05-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5606606/ /pubmed/29056686 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vetsci4020027 Text en © 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Niessen, Stijn J.M. Hazuchova, Katarina Powney, Sonya L. Guitian, Javier Niessen, Antonius P.M. Pion, Paul D. Shaw, James A. Church, David B. The Big Pet Diabetes Survey: Perceived Frequency and Triggers for Euthanasia |
title | The Big Pet Diabetes Survey: Perceived Frequency and Triggers for Euthanasia |
title_full | The Big Pet Diabetes Survey: Perceived Frequency and Triggers for Euthanasia |
title_fullStr | The Big Pet Diabetes Survey: Perceived Frequency and Triggers for Euthanasia |
title_full_unstemmed | The Big Pet Diabetes Survey: Perceived Frequency and Triggers for Euthanasia |
title_short | The Big Pet Diabetes Survey: Perceived Frequency and Triggers for Euthanasia |
title_sort | big pet diabetes survey: perceived frequency and triggers for euthanasia |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5606606/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29056686 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vetsci4020027 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT niessenstijnjm thebigpetdiabetessurveyperceivedfrequencyandtriggersforeuthanasia AT hazuchovakatarina thebigpetdiabetessurveyperceivedfrequencyandtriggersforeuthanasia AT powneysonyal thebigpetdiabetessurveyperceivedfrequencyandtriggersforeuthanasia AT guitianjavier thebigpetdiabetessurveyperceivedfrequencyandtriggersforeuthanasia AT niessenantoniuspm thebigpetdiabetessurveyperceivedfrequencyandtriggersforeuthanasia AT pionpauld thebigpetdiabetessurveyperceivedfrequencyandtriggersforeuthanasia AT shawjamesa thebigpetdiabetessurveyperceivedfrequencyandtriggersforeuthanasia AT churchdavidb thebigpetdiabetessurveyperceivedfrequencyandtriggersforeuthanasia AT niessenstijnjm bigpetdiabetessurveyperceivedfrequencyandtriggersforeuthanasia AT hazuchovakatarina bigpetdiabetessurveyperceivedfrequencyandtriggersforeuthanasia AT powneysonyal bigpetdiabetessurveyperceivedfrequencyandtriggersforeuthanasia AT guitianjavier bigpetdiabetessurveyperceivedfrequencyandtriggersforeuthanasia AT niessenantoniuspm bigpetdiabetessurveyperceivedfrequencyandtriggersforeuthanasia AT pionpauld bigpetdiabetessurveyperceivedfrequencyandtriggersforeuthanasia AT shawjamesa bigpetdiabetessurveyperceivedfrequencyandtriggersforeuthanasia AT churchdavidb bigpetdiabetessurveyperceivedfrequencyandtriggersforeuthanasia |