Cargando…

The Big Pet Diabetes Survey: Perceived Frequency and Triggers for Euthanasia

Current pet diabetes mellitus (DM) treatment necessitates the active daily involvement of owners and can be costly. The current study aimed to investigate the owner population which opts for euthanasia instead of DM treatment. A survey was designed using multiple feedback steps and made available on...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Niessen, Stijn J.M., Hazuchova, Katarina, Powney, Sonya L., Guitian, Javier, Niessen, Antonius P.M., Pion, Paul D., Shaw, James A., Church, David B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5606606/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29056686
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vetsci4020027
_version_ 1783265140303462400
author Niessen, Stijn J.M.
Hazuchova, Katarina
Powney, Sonya L.
Guitian, Javier
Niessen, Antonius P.M.
Pion, Paul D.
Shaw, James A.
Church, David B.
author_facet Niessen, Stijn J.M.
Hazuchova, Katarina
Powney, Sonya L.
Guitian, Javier
Niessen, Antonius P.M.
Pion, Paul D.
Shaw, James A.
Church, David B.
author_sort Niessen, Stijn J.M.
collection PubMed
description Current pet diabetes mellitus (DM) treatment necessitates the active daily involvement of owners and can be costly. The current study aimed to investigate the owner population which opts for euthanasia instead of DM treatment. A survey was designed using multiple feedback steps and made available online to veterinarians world-wide. A total of 1192 veterinarians completed the survey and suggested a median one in 10 diabetic pets are euthanased at diagnosis; a further median one in 10 within one year because of lack of success or compliance. Perceived most important motivating factors included “presence concurrent disease” (45% respondents); “costs” (44%); “animal age” (37%); “problems obtaining adequate control” (35%); “pet welfare” (35%); and “impact owner’s lifestyle” (32%). Cats in Canadian (odds ratio (OR) 2.7), Australian (OR 2.3), rural (OR 1.6) and mixed (OR 1.7) practices were more likely to be euthanased because of DM diagnosis, while cats presented to referral/university were less likely to be euthanased (OR 0.6). Dogs were more likely to be euthanased because of DM in Canadian (OR 1.8), rural (OR 1.8) and mixed (OR 1.6) practices. The survey results suggest that benefit exists in improved DM education with emphasis on offering a choice of treatment styles ranging from intense and expensive to hands-off and cheap.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5606606
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56066062017-10-18 The Big Pet Diabetes Survey: Perceived Frequency and Triggers for Euthanasia Niessen, Stijn J.M. Hazuchova, Katarina Powney, Sonya L. Guitian, Javier Niessen, Antonius P.M. Pion, Paul D. Shaw, James A. Church, David B. Vet Sci Article Current pet diabetes mellitus (DM) treatment necessitates the active daily involvement of owners and can be costly. The current study aimed to investigate the owner population which opts for euthanasia instead of DM treatment. A survey was designed using multiple feedback steps and made available online to veterinarians world-wide. A total of 1192 veterinarians completed the survey and suggested a median one in 10 diabetic pets are euthanased at diagnosis; a further median one in 10 within one year because of lack of success or compliance. Perceived most important motivating factors included “presence concurrent disease” (45% respondents); “costs” (44%); “animal age” (37%); “problems obtaining adequate control” (35%); “pet welfare” (35%); and “impact owner’s lifestyle” (32%). Cats in Canadian (odds ratio (OR) 2.7), Australian (OR 2.3), rural (OR 1.6) and mixed (OR 1.7) practices were more likely to be euthanased because of DM diagnosis, while cats presented to referral/university were less likely to be euthanased (OR 0.6). Dogs were more likely to be euthanased because of DM in Canadian (OR 1.8), rural (OR 1.8) and mixed (OR 1.6) practices. The survey results suggest that benefit exists in improved DM education with emphasis on offering a choice of treatment styles ranging from intense and expensive to hands-off and cheap. MDPI 2017-05-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5606606/ /pubmed/29056686 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vetsci4020027 Text en © 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Niessen, Stijn J.M.
Hazuchova, Katarina
Powney, Sonya L.
Guitian, Javier
Niessen, Antonius P.M.
Pion, Paul D.
Shaw, James A.
Church, David B.
The Big Pet Diabetes Survey: Perceived Frequency and Triggers for Euthanasia
title The Big Pet Diabetes Survey: Perceived Frequency and Triggers for Euthanasia
title_full The Big Pet Diabetes Survey: Perceived Frequency and Triggers for Euthanasia
title_fullStr The Big Pet Diabetes Survey: Perceived Frequency and Triggers for Euthanasia
title_full_unstemmed The Big Pet Diabetes Survey: Perceived Frequency and Triggers for Euthanasia
title_short The Big Pet Diabetes Survey: Perceived Frequency and Triggers for Euthanasia
title_sort big pet diabetes survey: perceived frequency and triggers for euthanasia
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5606606/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29056686
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vetsci4020027
work_keys_str_mv AT niessenstijnjm thebigpetdiabetessurveyperceivedfrequencyandtriggersforeuthanasia
AT hazuchovakatarina thebigpetdiabetessurveyperceivedfrequencyandtriggersforeuthanasia
AT powneysonyal thebigpetdiabetessurveyperceivedfrequencyandtriggersforeuthanasia
AT guitianjavier thebigpetdiabetessurveyperceivedfrequencyandtriggersforeuthanasia
AT niessenantoniuspm thebigpetdiabetessurveyperceivedfrequencyandtriggersforeuthanasia
AT pionpauld thebigpetdiabetessurveyperceivedfrequencyandtriggersforeuthanasia
AT shawjamesa thebigpetdiabetessurveyperceivedfrequencyandtriggersforeuthanasia
AT churchdavidb thebigpetdiabetessurveyperceivedfrequencyandtriggersforeuthanasia
AT niessenstijnjm bigpetdiabetessurveyperceivedfrequencyandtriggersforeuthanasia
AT hazuchovakatarina bigpetdiabetessurveyperceivedfrequencyandtriggersforeuthanasia
AT powneysonyal bigpetdiabetessurveyperceivedfrequencyandtriggersforeuthanasia
AT guitianjavier bigpetdiabetessurveyperceivedfrequencyandtriggersforeuthanasia
AT niessenantoniuspm bigpetdiabetessurveyperceivedfrequencyandtriggersforeuthanasia
AT pionpauld bigpetdiabetessurveyperceivedfrequencyandtriggersforeuthanasia
AT shawjamesa bigpetdiabetessurveyperceivedfrequencyandtriggersforeuthanasia
AT churchdavidb bigpetdiabetessurveyperceivedfrequencyandtriggersforeuthanasia