Cargando…
Individual versus group decision making: Jurors’ reliance on central and peripheral information to evaluate expert testimony
To investigate dual-process persuasion theories in the context of group decision making, we studied low and high need-for-cognition (NFC) participants within a mock trial study. Participants considered plaintiff and defense expert scientific testimony that varied in argument strength. All participan...
Autores principales: | Salerno, Jessica M., Bottoms, Bette L., Peter-Hagene, Liana C. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5606931/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28931011 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183580 |
Ejemplares similares
-
The Interactive Effects of Race and Expert Testimony on Jurors’ Perceptions of Recanted Confessions
por: Ewanation, Logan, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Juror comprehension of forensic expert testimony: A literature review and gap analysis
por: Eldridge, Heidi
Publicado: (2019) -
Culture in the Courtroom: Ethnocentrism and Juror Decision-Making
por: Maeder, Evelyn M., et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Evaluating witness testimony: Juror knowledge, false memory, and the utility of evidence-based directions
por: Helm, Rebecca K.
Publicado: (2021) -
Cognitive and human factors in legal layperson decision making: Sources
of bias in juror decision making
por: Curley, Lee J., et al.
Publicado: (2022)