Cargando…

Social disparities in food preparation behaviours: a DEDIPAC study

BACKGROUND: The specific role of major socio-economic indicators in influencing food preparation behaviours could reveal distinct socio-economic patterns, thus enabling mechanisms to be understood that contribute to social inequalities in health. This study investigated whether there was an independ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Méjean, Caroline, Si Hassen, Wendy, Gojard, Séverine, Ducrot, Pauline, Lampuré, Aurélie, Brug, Hans, Lien, Nanna, Nicolaou, Mary, Holdsworth, Michelle, Terragni, Laura, Hercberg, Serge, Castetbon, Katia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5607511/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28931416
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12937-017-0281-2
_version_ 1783265300911751168
author Méjean, Caroline
Si Hassen, Wendy
Gojard, Séverine
Ducrot, Pauline
Lampuré, Aurélie
Brug, Hans
Lien, Nanna
Nicolaou, Mary
Holdsworth, Michelle
Terragni, Laura
Hercberg, Serge
Castetbon, Katia
author_facet Méjean, Caroline
Si Hassen, Wendy
Gojard, Séverine
Ducrot, Pauline
Lampuré, Aurélie
Brug, Hans
Lien, Nanna
Nicolaou, Mary
Holdsworth, Michelle
Terragni, Laura
Hercberg, Serge
Castetbon, Katia
author_sort Méjean, Caroline
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The specific role of major socio-economic indicators in influencing food preparation behaviours could reveal distinct socio-economic patterns, thus enabling mechanisms to be understood that contribute to social inequalities in health. This study investigated whether there was an independent association of each socio-economic indicator (education, occupation, income) with food preparation behaviours. METHODS: A total of 62,373 adults participating in the web-based NutriNet-Santé cohort study were included in our cross-sectional analyses. Cooking skills, preparation from scratch and kitchen equipment were assessed using a 0–10-point score; frequency of meal preparation, enjoyment of cooking and willingness to cook better/more frequently were categorical variables. Independent associations between socio-economic factors (education, income and occupation) and food preparation behaviours were assessed using analysis of covariance and logistic regression models stratified by sex. The models simultaneously included the three socio-economic indicators, adjusting for age, household composition and whether or not they were the main cook in the household. RESULTS: Participants with the lowest education, the lowest income group and female manual and office workers spent more time preparing food daily than participants with the highest education, those with the highest income and managerial staff (P < 0.0001). The lowest educated individuals were more likely to be non-cooks than those with the highest education level (Women: OR = 3.36 (1.69;6.69); Men: OR = 1.83 (1.07;3.16)) while female manual and office workers and the never-employed were less likely to be non-cooks (OR = 0.52 (0.28;0.97); OR = 0.30 (0.11;0.77)). Female manual and office workers had lower scores of preparation from scratch and were less likely to want to cook more frequently than managerial staff (P < 0.001 and P < 0.001). Women belonging to the lowest income group had a lower score of kitchen equipment (P < 0.0001) and were less likely to enjoy cooking meal daily (OR = 0.68 (0.45;0.86)) than those with the highest income. CONCLUSION: Lowest socio-economic groups, particularly women, spend more time preparing food than high socioeconomic groups. However, female manual and office workers used less raw or fresh ingredients to prepare meals than managerial staff. In the unfavourable context in France with reduced time spent preparing meals over last decades, our findings showed socioeconomic disparities in food preparation behaviours in women, whereas few differences were observed in men. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12937-017-0281-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5607511
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56075112017-09-24 Social disparities in food preparation behaviours: a DEDIPAC study Méjean, Caroline Si Hassen, Wendy Gojard, Séverine Ducrot, Pauline Lampuré, Aurélie Brug, Hans Lien, Nanna Nicolaou, Mary Holdsworth, Michelle Terragni, Laura Hercberg, Serge Castetbon, Katia Nutr J Research BACKGROUND: The specific role of major socio-economic indicators in influencing food preparation behaviours could reveal distinct socio-economic patterns, thus enabling mechanisms to be understood that contribute to social inequalities in health. This study investigated whether there was an independent association of each socio-economic indicator (education, occupation, income) with food preparation behaviours. METHODS: A total of 62,373 adults participating in the web-based NutriNet-Santé cohort study were included in our cross-sectional analyses. Cooking skills, preparation from scratch and kitchen equipment were assessed using a 0–10-point score; frequency of meal preparation, enjoyment of cooking and willingness to cook better/more frequently were categorical variables. Independent associations between socio-economic factors (education, income and occupation) and food preparation behaviours were assessed using analysis of covariance and logistic regression models stratified by sex. The models simultaneously included the three socio-economic indicators, adjusting for age, household composition and whether or not they were the main cook in the household. RESULTS: Participants with the lowest education, the lowest income group and female manual and office workers spent more time preparing food daily than participants with the highest education, those with the highest income and managerial staff (P < 0.0001). The lowest educated individuals were more likely to be non-cooks than those with the highest education level (Women: OR = 3.36 (1.69;6.69); Men: OR = 1.83 (1.07;3.16)) while female manual and office workers and the never-employed were less likely to be non-cooks (OR = 0.52 (0.28;0.97); OR = 0.30 (0.11;0.77)). Female manual and office workers had lower scores of preparation from scratch and were less likely to want to cook more frequently than managerial staff (P < 0.001 and P < 0.001). Women belonging to the lowest income group had a lower score of kitchen equipment (P < 0.0001) and were less likely to enjoy cooking meal daily (OR = 0.68 (0.45;0.86)) than those with the highest income. CONCLUSION: Lowest socio-economic groups, particularly women, spend more time preparing food than high socioeconomic groups. However, female manual and office workers used less raw or fresh ingredients to prepare meals than managerial staff. In the unfavourable context in France with reduced time spent preparing meals over last decades, our findings showed socioeconomic disparities in food preparation behaviours in women, whereas few differences were observed in men. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12937-017-0281-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5607511/ /pubmed/28931416 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12937-017-0281-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Méjean, Caroline
Si Hassen, Wendy
Gojard, Séverine
Ducrot, Pauline
Lampuré, Aurélie
Brug, Hans
Lien, Nanna
Nicolaou, Mary
Holdsworth, Michelle
Terragni, Laura
Hercberg, Serge
Castetbon, Katia
Social disparities in food preparation behaviours: a DEDIPAC study
title Social disparities in food preparation behaviours: a DEDIPAC study
title_full Social disparities in food preparation behaviours: a DEDIPAC study
title_fullStr Social disparities in food preparation behaviours: a DEDIPAC study
title_full_unstemmed Social disparities in food preparation behaviours: a DEDIPAC study
title_short Social disparities in food preparation behaviours: a DEDIPAC study
title_sort social disparities in food preparation behaviours: a dedipac study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5607511/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28931416
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12937-017-0281-2
work_keys_str_mv AT mejeancaroline socialdisparitiesinfoodpreparationbehavioursadedipacstudy
AT sihassenwendy socialdisparitiesinfoodpreparationbehavioursadedipacstudy
AT gojardseverine socialdisparitiesinfoodpreparationbehavioursadedipacstudy
AT ducrotpauline socialdisparitiesinfoodpreparationbehavioursadedipacstudy
AT lampureaurelie socialdisparitiesinfoodpreparationbehavioursadedipacstudy
AT brughans socialdisparitiesinfoodpreparationbehavioursadedipacstudy
AT liennanna socialdisparitiesinfoodpreparationbehavioursadedipacstudy
AT nicolaoumary socialdisparitiesinfoodpreparationbehavioursadedipacstudy
AT holdsworthmichelle socialdisparitiesinfoodpreparationbehavioursadedipacstudy
AT terragnilaura socialdisparitiesinfoodpreparationbehavioursadedipacstudy
AT hercbergserge socialdisparitiesinfoodpreparationbehavioursadedipacstudy
AT castetbonkatia socialdisparitiesinfoodpreparationbehavioursadedipacstudy