Cargando…

Magnetic Resonance-guided High Intensity Focused Ultrasound in the presence of biopsy markers

BACKGROUND: Magnetic Resonance guided High Intensity Focused ultrasound (MR-HIFU) offers precise non-invasive thermotherapy for clinical applications such as the treatment of breast lesions. However, patients with a biopsy marker are usually not eligible for MR-HIFU treatment. This study investigate...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mougenot, Charles, Moonen, Chrit
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5607585/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28944056
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40349-017-0103-1
_version_ 1783265316861640704
author Mougenot, Charles
Moonen, Chrit
author_facet Mougenot, Charles
Moonen, Chrit
author_sort Mougenot, Charles
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Magnetic Resonance guided High Intensity Focused ultrasound (MR-HIFU) offers precise non-invasive thermotherapy for clinical applications such as the treatment of breast lesions. However, patients with a biopsy marker are usually not eligible for MR-HIFU treatment. This study investigates the interaction of some MR-compatible markers with MR-HIFU thermotherapy. METHODS: The MR-HIFU compatibility of 14 markers (6 Gold Anchor and 4 Visicoil markers in gold, 1 Visicoil marker in brass, 3 BiomarC markers in carbon coated) were tested using the Sonalleve breast MR-HIFU platform at 1.5 T. The impact of these markers was assessed by counting the number of voxels with low signal intensity on MR thermal maps and by comparing temperature increases induced by the HIFU beam. RESULTS: Most markers were visible on thermal maps with an apparent size 4.2 ± 3.1 and 2 ± 1.8 times larger than their respective actual width and length. The volume of masked voxels was for most of the markers much larger than the actual volume of the marker (up to a factor 65.1). However, it represents only a small fraction of the 12 mm diameter targeted region (up to 8.8 voxels which represents 19% of this targeted region). Some differences in the maximal temperature increase were observed especially for BiomarC 1 × 3 and BiomarC 2 × 4 markers enhancing the heating. These differences were less pronounced at the edge of the targeted region. CONCLUSION: All markers had a minimal impact on the volume above the thermal dose threshold of 240 EM since the differences measured were smaller than the in-plane image resolution of 1.56 mm.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5607585
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56075852017-09-24 Magnetic Resonance-guided High Intensity Focused Ultrasound in the presence of biopsy markers Mougenot, Charles Moonen, Chrit J Ther Ultrasound Research BACKGROUND: Magnetic Resonance guided High Intensity Focused ultrasound (MR-HIFU) offers precise non-invasive thermotherapy for clinical applications such as the treatment of breast lesions. However, patients with a biopsy marker are usually not eligible for MR-HIFU treatment. This study investigates the interaction of some MR-compatible markers with MR-HIFU thermotherapy. METHODS: The MR-HIFU compatibility of 14 markers (6 Gold Anchor and 4 Visicoil markers in gold, 1 Visicoil marker in brass, 3 BiomarC markers in carbon coated) were tested using the Sonalleve breast MR-HIFU platform at 1.5 T. The impact of these markers was assessed by counting the number of voxels with low signal intensity on MR thermal maps and by comparing temperature increases induced by the HIFU beam. RESULTS: Most markers were visible on thermal maps with an apparent size 4.2 ± 3.1 and 2 ± 1.8 times larger than their respective actual width and length. The volume of masked voxels was for most of the markers much larger than the actual volume of the marker (up to a factor 65.1). However, it represents only a small fraction of the 12 mm diameter targeted region (up to 8.8 voxels which represents 19% of this targeted region). Some differences in the maximal temperature increase were observed especially for BiomarC 1 × 3 and BiomarC 2 × 4 markers enhancing the heating. These differences were less pronounced at the edge of the targeted region. CONCLUSION: All markers had a minimal impact on the volume above the thermal dose threshold of 240 EM since the differences measured were smaller than the in-plane image resolution of 1.56 mm. BioMed Central 2017-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5607585/ /pubmed/28944056 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40349-017-0103-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Mougenot, Charles
Moonen, Chrit
Magnetic Resonance-guided High Intensity Focused Ultrasound in the presence of biopsy markers
title Magnetic Resonance-guided High Intensity Focused Ultrasound in the presence of biopsy markers
title_full Magnetic Resonance-guided High Intensity Focused Ultrasound in the presence of biopsy markers
title_fullStr Magnetic Resonance-guided High Intensity Focused Ultrasound in the presence of biopsy markers
title_full_unstemmed Magnetic Resonance-guided High Intensity Focused Ultrasound in the presence of biopsy markers
title_short Magnetic Resonance-guided High Intensity Focused Ultrasound in the presence of biopsy markers
title_sort magnetic resonance-guided high intensity focused ultrasound in the presence of biopsy markers
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5607585/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28944056
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40349-017-0103-1
work_keys_str_mv AT mougenotcharles magneticresonanceguidedhighintensityfocusedultrasoundinthepresenceofbiopsymarkers
AT moonenchrit magneticresonanceguidedhighintensityfocusedultrasoundinthepresenceofbiopsymarkers