Cargando…

Animal Board Invited Review: Comparing conventional and organic livestock production systems on different aspects of sustainability

To sustainably contribute to food security of a growing and richer world population, livestock production systems are challenged to increase production levels while reducing environmental impact, being economically viable, and socially responsible. Knowledge about the sustainability performance of c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Wagenberg, C. P. A., de Haas, Y., Hogeveen, H., van Krimpen, M. M., Meuwissen, M. P. M., van Middelaar, C. E., Rodenburg, T. B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5607874/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28558861
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S175173111700115X
_version_ 1783265355796316160
author van Wagenberg, C. P. A.
de Haas, Y.
Hogeveen, H.
van Krimpen, M. M.
Meuwissen, M. P. M.
van Middelaar, C. E.
Rodenburg, T. B.
author_facet van Wagenberg, C. P. A.
de Haas, Y.
Hogeveen, H.
van Krimpen, M. M.
Meuwissen, M. P. M.
van Middelaar, C. E.
Rodenburg, T. B.
author_sort van Wagenberg, C. P. A.
collection PubMed
description To sustainably contribute to food security of a growing and richer world population, livestock production systems are challenged to increase production levels while reducing environmental impact, being economically viable, and socially responsible. Knowledge about the sustainability performance of current livestock production systems may help to formulate strategies for future systems. Our study provides a systematic overview of differences between conventional and organic livestock production systems on a broad range of sustainability aspects and animal species available in peer-reviewed literature. Systems were compared on economy, productivity, environmental impact, animal welfare and public health. The review was limited to dairy cattle, beef cattle, pigs, broilers and laying hens, and to Europe, North America and New Zealand. Results per indicators are presented as in the articles without performing additional calculations. Out of 4171 initial search hits, 179 articles were analysed. Studies varied widely in indicators, research design, sample size and location and context. Quite some studies used small samples. No study analysed all aspects of sustainability simultaneously. Conventional systems had lower labour requirements per unit product, lower income risk per animal, higher production per animal per time unit, higher reproduction numbers, lower feed conversion ratio, lower land use, generally lower acidification and eutrophication potential per unit product, equal or better udder health for cows and equal or lower microbiological contamination. Organic systems had higher income per animal or full time employee, lower impact on biodiversity, lower eutrophication and acidification potential per unit land, equal or lower likelihood of antibiotic resistance in bacteria and higher beneficial fatty acid levels in cow milk. For most sustainability aspects, sometimes conventional and sometimes organic systems performed better, except for productivity, which was consistently higher in conventional systems. For many aspects and animal species, more data are needed to conclude on a difference between organic and conventional livestock production systems.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5607874
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56078742017-09-26 Animal Board Invited Review: Comparing conventional and organic livestock production systems on different aspects of sustainability van Wagenberg, C. P. A. de Haas, Y. Hogeveen, H. van Krimpen, M. M. Meuwissen, M. P. M. van Middelaar, C. E. Rodenburg, T. B. Animal Review Article To sustainably contribute to food security of a growing and richer world population, livestock production systems are challenged to increase production levels while reducing environmental impact, being economically viable, and socially responsible. Knowledge about the sustainability performance of current livestock production systems may help to formulate strategies for future systems. Our study provides a systematic overview of differences between conventional and organic livestock production systems on a broad range of sustainability aspects and animal species available in peer-reviewed literature. Systems were compared on economy, productivity, environmental impact, animal welfare and public health. The review was limited to dairy cattle, beef cattle, pigs, broilers and laying hens, and to Europe, North America and New Zealand. Results per indicators are presented as in the articles without performing additional calculations. Out of 4171 initial search hits, 179 articles were analysed. Studies varied widely in indicators, research design, sample size and location and context. Quite some studies used small samples. No study analysed all aspects of sustainability simultaneously. Conventional systems had lower labour requirements per unit product, lower income risk per animal, higher production per animal per time unit, higher reproduction numbers, lower feed conversion ratio, lower land use, generally lower acidification and eutrophication potential per unit product, equal or better udder health for cows and equal or lower microbiological contamination. Organic systems had higher income per animal or full time employee, lower impact on biodiversity, lower eutrophication and acidification potential per unit land, equal or lower likelihood of antibiotic resistance in bacteria and higher beneficial fatty acid levels in cow milk. For most sustainability aspects, sometimes conventional and sometimes organic systems performed better, except for productivity, which was consistently higher in conventional systems. For many aspects and animal species, more data are needed to conclude on a difference between organic and conventional livestock production systems. Cambridge University Press 2017-05-31 2017-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5607874/ /pubmed/28558861 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S175173111700115X Text en © The Animal Consortium 2017 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
van Wagenberg, C. P. A.
de Haas, Y.
Hogeveen, H.
van Krimpen, M. M.
Meuwissen, M. P. M.
van Middelaar, C. E.
Rodenburg, T. B.
Animal Board Invited Review: Comparing conventional and organic livestock production systems on different aspects of sustainability
title Animal Board Invited Review: Comparing conventional and organic livestock production systems on different aspects of sustainability
title_full Animal Board Invited Review: Comparing conventional and organic livestock production systems on different aspects of sustainability
title_fullStr Animal Board Invited Review: Comparing conventional and organic livestock production systems on different aspects of sustainability
title_full_unstemmed Animal Board Invited Review: Comparing conventional and organic livestock production systems on different aspects of sustainability
title_short Animal Board Invited Review: Comparing conventional and organic livestock production systems on different aspects of sustainability
title_sort animal board invited review: comparing conventional and organic livestock production systems on different aspects of sustainability
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5607874/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28558861
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S175173111700115X
work_keys_str_mv AT vanwagenbergcpa animalboardinvitedreviewcomparingconventionalandorganiclivestockproductionsystemsondifferentaspectsofsustainability
AT dehaasy animalboardinvitedreviewcomparingconventionalandorganiclivestockproductionsystemsondifferentaspectsofsustainability
AT hogeveenh animalboardinvitedreviewcomparingconventionalandorganiclivestockproductionsystemsondifferentaspectsofsustainability
AT vankrimpenmm animalboardinvitedreviewcomparingconventionalandorganiclivestockproductionsystemsondifferentaspectsofsustainability
AT meuwissenmpm animalboardinvitedreviewcomparingconventionalandorganiclivestockproductionsystemsondifferentaspectsofsustainability
AT vanmiddelaarce animalboardinvitedreviewcomparingconventionalandorganiclivestockproductionsystemsondifferentaspectsofsustainability
AT rodenburgtb animalboardinvitedreviewcomparingconventionalandorganiclivestockproductionsystemsondifferentaspectsofsustainability