Cargando…

Smell or vision? The use of different sensory modalities in predator discrimination

ABSTRACT: Theory predicts that animals should adjust their escape responses to the perceived predation risk. The information animals obtain about potential predation risk may differ qualitatively depending on the sensory modality by which a cue is perceived. For instance, olfactory cues may reveal b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fischer, Stefan, Oberhummer, Evelyne, Cunha-Saraiva, Filipa, Gerber, Nina, Taborsky, Barbara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5607904/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28989227
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00265-017-2371-8
_version_ 1783265358399930368
author Fischer, Stefan
Oberhummer, Evelyne
Cunha-Saraiva, Filipa
Gerber, Nina
Taborsky, Barbara
author_facet Fischer, Stefan
Oberhummer, Evelyne
Cunha-Saraiva, Filipa
Gerber, Nina
Taborsky, Barbara
author_sort Fischer, Stefan
collection PubMed
description ABSTRACT: Theory predicts that animals should adjust their escape responses to the perceived predation risk. The information animals obtain about potential predation risk may differ qualitatively depending on the sensory modality by which a cue is perceived. For instance, olfactory cues may reveal better information about the presence or absence of threats, whereas visual information can reliably transmit the position and potential attack distance of a predator. While this suggests a differential use of information perceived through the two sensory channels, the relative importance of visual vs. olfactory cues when distinguishing between different predation threats is still poorly understood. Therefore, we exposed individuals of the cooperatively breeding cichlid Neolamprologus pulcher to a standardized threat stimulus combined with either predator or non-predator cues presented either visually or chemically. We predicted that flight responses towards a threat stimulus are more pronounced if cues of dangerous rather than harmless heterospecifics are presented and that N. pulcher, being an aquatic species, relies more on olfaction when discriminating between dangerous and harmless heterospecifics. N. pulcher responded faster to the threat stimulus, reached a refuge faster and entered a refuge more likely when predator cues were perceived. Unexpectedly, the sensory modality used to perceive the cues did not affect the escape response or the duration of the recovery phase. This suggests that N. pulcher are able to discriminate heterospecific cues with similar acuity when using vision or olfaction. We discuss that this ability may be advantageous in aquatic environments where the visibility conditions strongly vary over time. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: The ability to rapidly discriminate between dangerous predators and harmless heterospecifics is crucial for the survival of prey animals. In seasonally fluctuating environment, sensory conditions may change over the year and may make the use of multiple sensory modalities for heterospecific discrimination highly beneficial. Here we compared the efficacy of visual and olfactory senses in the discrimination ability of the cooperatively breeding cichlid Neolamprologus pulcher. We presented individual fish with visual or olfactory cues of predators or harmless heterospecifics and recorded their flight response. When exposed to predator cues, individuals responded faster, reached a refuge faster and were more likely to enter the refuge. Unexpectedly, the olfactory and visual senses seemed to be equally efficient in this discrimination task, suggesting that seasonal variation of water conditions experienced by N. pulcher may necessitate the use of multiple sensory channels for the same task. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00265-017-2371-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5607904
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56079042017-10-05 Smell or vision? The use of different sensory modalities in predator discrimination Fischer, Stefan Oberhummer, Evelyne Cunha-Saraiva, Filipa Gerber, Nina Taborsky, Barbara Behav Ecol Sociobiol Original Article ABSTRACT: Theory predicts that animals should adjust their escape responses to the perceived predation risk. The information animals obtain about potential predation risk may differ qualitatively depending on the sensory modality by which a cue is perceived. For instance, olfactory cues may reveal better information about the presence or absence of threats, whereas visual information can reliably transmit the position and potential attack distance of a predator. While this suggests a differential use of information perceived through the two sensory channels, the relative importance of visual vs. olfactory cues when distinguishing between different predation threats is still poorly understood. Therefore, we exposed individuals of the cooperatively breeding cichlid Neolamprologus pulcher to a standardized threat stimulus combined with either predator or non-predator cues presented either visually or chemically. We predicted that flight responses towards a threat stimulus are more pronounced if cues of dangerous rather than harmless heterospecifics are presented and that N. pulcher, being an aquatic species, relies more on olfaction when discriminating between dangerous and harmless heterospecifics. N. pulcher responded faster to the threat stimulus, reached a refuge faster and entered a refuge more likely when predator cues were perceived. Unexpectedly, the sensory modality used to perceive the cues did not affect the escape response or the duration of the recovery phase. This suggests that N. pulcher are able to discriminate heterospecific cues with similar acuity when using vision or olfaction. We discuss that this ability may be advantageous in aquatic environments where the visibility conditions strongly vary over time. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: The ability to rapidly discriminate between dangerous predators and harmless heterospecifics is crucial for the survival of prey animals. In seasonally fluctuating environment, sensory conditions may change over the year and may make the use of multiple sensory modalities for heterospecific discrimination highly beneficial. Here we compared the efficacy of visual and olfactory senses in the discrimination ability of the cooperatively breeding cichlid Neolamprologus pulcher. We presented individual fish with visual or olfactory cues of predators or harmless heterospecifics and recorded their flight response. When exposed to predator cues, individuals responded faster, reached a refuge faster and were more likely to enter the refuge. Unexpectedly, the olfactory and visual senses seemed to be equally efficient in this discrimination task, suggesting that seasonal variation of water conditions experienced by N. pulcher may necessitate the use of multiple sensory channels for the same task. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00265-017-2371-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017-09-08 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5607904/ /pubmed/28989227 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00265-017-2371-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Fischer, Stefan
Oberhummer, Evelyne
Cunha-Saraiva, Filipa
Gerber, Nina
Taborsky, Barbara
Smell or vision? The use of different sensory modalities in predator discrimination
title Smell or vision? The use of different sensory modalities in predator discrimination
title_full Smell or vision? The use of different sensory modalities in predator discrimination
title_fullStr Smell or vision? The use of different sensory modalities in predator discrimination
title_full_unstemmed Smell or vision? The use of different sensory modalities in predator discrimination
title_short Smell or vision? The use of different sensory modalities in predator discrimination
title_sort smell or vision? the use of different sensory modalities in predator discrimination
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5607904/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28989227
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00265-017-2371-8
work_keys_str_mv AT fischerstefan smellorvisiontheuseofdifferentsensorymodalitiesinpredatordiscrimination
AT oberhummerevelyne smellorvisiontheuseofdifferentsensorymodalitiesinpredatordiscrimination
AT cunhasaraivafilipa smellorvisiontheuseofdifferentsensorymodalitiesinpredatordiscrimination
AT gerbernina smellorvisiontheuseofdifferentsensorymodalitiesinpredatordiscrimination
AT taborskybarbara smellorvisiontheuseofdifferentsensorymodalitiesinpredatordiscrimination